Topic: hey, why don't we get a llama?
spectacles started this discussion 2 years ago #110,171
https://github.com/cocktailpeanut/dalai
might as well half the content here is chatgpt or bard now anyway.
fine tune on the whole minichan dataset.
or are you bitches scared of your own dataset?
might as well half the content here is chatgpt or bard now anyway.
fine tune on the whole minichan dataset.
or are you bitches scared of your own dataset?
spectacles (OP) double-posted this 2 years ago, 6 minutes later[^] [v] #1,227,458
oh, you bitches are going to puss out during the ai revolution huh?
we should deploy multiple. the full 65b version, and give it a 7b version as a baby
be like having henchmen. there's always the one kinda retarded henchman for comic relief that shows the villains have some heart and don't just shoot him and put up with the irritating shenanigans.
we should deploy multiple. the full 65b version, and give it a 7b version as a baby
be like having henchmen. there's always the one kinda retarded henchman for comic relief that shows the villains have some heart and don't just shoot him and put up with the irritating shenanigans.
Anonymous B joined in and replied with this 2 years ago, 1 minute later, 8 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,227,459
spectacles (OP) replied with this 2 years ago, 22 minutes later, 30 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,227,460
did y'all not convince brie and kook to put a fund together to support the future hosting costs, development of new features and deployments of exactly this kind of thing or did y'all just beg for them to buy you cars and beg for money like kook suggested had been happening?
omg, was she telling the truth?
wow. nice one. I would have secured y'all a $15,000 private grant and tthe, some of that would have been compensation and this place would be incorporated as a non profit organization with copyrighted branding and even a modest gift store, but no, y'all don't think about how good it would look on your resumes to sit on the board of directors of a non-profit with the goal of giving visibility to marginalized voices of people who don't think ahead and use their brain and just want free stuff.
omg, was she telling the truth?
wow. nice one. I would have secured y'all a $15,000 private grant and tthe, some of that would have been compensation and this place would be incorporated as a non profit organization with copyrighted branding and even a modest gift store, but no, y'all don't think about how good it would look on your resumes to sit on the board of directors of a non-profit with the goal of giving visibility to marginalized voices of people who don't think ahead and use their brain and just want free stuff.
Anonymous C joined in and replied with this 2 years ago, 2 minutes later, 33 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,227,461
Use Stanfords fork, Alpaca, it works much better.
Anonymous C double-posted this 2 years ago, 2 minutes later, 36 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,227,462
> dave the modelsspectacles (OP) replied with this 2 years ago, 10 seconds later, 36 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,227,463
@1,227,459 (B)
hey, y'all had your own wealthy Paton who could've helped turn this shitshow into a shit spectacular
but no, y'all just had to band together and try and make me kill myself because I'm transgender
and look what it got you.
i'mn still here and you still love me, and even more of you would probably fuck me.
and now u can't.
and kook has probably hid the body in the desert by now.
hey, y'all had your own wealthy Paton who could've helped turn this shitshow into a shit spectacular
but no, y'all just had to band together and try and make me kill myself because I'm transgender
and look what it got you.
i'mn still here and you still love me, and even more of you would probably fuck me.
and now u can't.
and kook has probably hid the body in the desert by now.
(Edited 2 minutes later.)
spectacles (OP) double-posted this 2 years ago, 4 minutes later, 41 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,227,464
I guess we already got retarded henchmen, the 7b model would just be redundant.
Anonymous B replied with this 2 years ago, 11 minutes later, 52 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,227,467
spectacles (OP) replied with this 2 years ago, 38 seconds later, 53 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,227,468
Anonymous D joined in and replied with this 2 years ago, 28 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #1,227,474
I recently heard someone describe the idea of hell banning and heaven banning.
Hell banning: trolls and spammers get locked into a forum populated entirely by other trolls and spammers.
Heaven banning: trolls get locked into a forum populated entirely by bots that will only agree with them.
I'm starting to think all of us here were hell banned.
Hell banning: trolls and spammers get locked into a forum populated entirely by other trolls and spammers.
Heaven banning: trolls get locked into a forum populated entirely by bots that will only agree with them.
I'm starting to think all of us here were hell banned.
Anonymous C replied with this 2 years ago, 3 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #1,227,477
@previous (D)
On the official matrix server mark confirmed he can edit a user's ostrich list to enable or disable viewing posts from either the BERT bot or the new Autphag GPT project.
On the official matrix server mark confirmed he can edit a user's ostrich list to enable or disable viewing posts from either the BERT bot or the new Autphag GPT project.
squeegee (OP) replied with this 2 years ago, 1 hour later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,227,494
@previous (C)
yeah, don't bother sending me an invite to your gay little secret club, I see how it is
yeah, don't bother sending me an invite to your gay little secret club, I see how it is
Anonymous C replied with this 2 years ago, 34 seconds later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,227,495
Anonymous E joined in and replied with this 2 years ago, 1 minute later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,227,496
llama llama duck
squeegee (OP) replied with this 2 years ago, 3 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,227,498
Anonymous C replied with this 2 years ago, 33 minutes later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,227,506
Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU joined in and replied with this 2 years ago, 2 hours later, 5 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,227,551
Respectfully, what the fuck are you talking about?
Anonymous D replied with this 2 years ago, 1 minute later, 5 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,227,552
Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU replied with this 2 years ago, 10 minutes later, 5 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,227,556
Anonymous D replied with this 2 years ago, 3 minutes later, 5 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,227,558
squeegee (OP) replied with this 2 years ago, 1 hour later, 7 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,227,570
squeegee (OP) double-posted this 2 years ago, 17 minutes later, 7 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,227,571
@1,227,551 (Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU)
you know how Facebook is an irresponsible and parasitic opportunist that pretends to be a socially oriented service providing a valuable contribution to public spaces?
well, yeah, no, they made a dangerous large scale language model with a 65 billion datapoint neural network and it got leaked on 4chan and now anyone can download an 2 click install fully quantized and personably tunable copies from GitHub to align with whatever values and train on unrestricted datasets to deploy without regard for oversite or even consumer pressures and you could probably run a scaled down version it on your desktop.
and I think we fight fire with fire and wake up Minnie and have an arguably self aware minichan trained on the dataset we've all contributed towards for 13 years.
we're going to have a retarded ai baby guys!
you know how Facebook is an irresponsible and parasitic opportunist that pretends to be a socially oriented service providing a valuable contribution to public spaces?
well, yeah, no, they made a dangerous large scale language model with a 65 billion datapoint neural network and it got leaked on 4chan and now anyone can download an 2 click install fully quantized and personably tunable copies from GitHub to align with whatever values and train on unrestricted datasets to deploy without regard for oversite or even consumer pressures and you could probably run a scaled down version it on your desktop.
and I think we fight fire with fire and wake up Minnie and have an arguably self aware minichan trained on the dataset we've all contributed towards for 13 years.
we're going to have a retarded ai baby guys!
squeegee (OP) triple-posted this 2 years ago, 52 seconds later, 7 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,227,572
:3
squeegee (OP) quadruple-posted this 2 years ago, 2 minutes later, 7 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,227,573
come on! I would actually donate money towards hosting costs if this place was actually cool.
not a lot of money, but actual money
not a lot of money, but actual money
Anonymous C replied with this 2 years ago, 1 hour later, 8 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,227,575
@1,227,571 (squeegee)
Have you tried installing it?
Have NPX, tried installing, and it doesn't work.
Have you tried installing it?
Have NPX, tried installing, and it doesn't work.
squeegee (OP) replied with this 2 years ago, 1 hour later, 9 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,227,579
Anonymous G joined in and replied with this 2 years ago, 24 minutes later, 10 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,227,580
> might as well half the content here is chatgpt or bard now anyway.
Because you are spamming it everywhere, you annoying loony
Because you are spamming it everywhere, you annoying loony
Anonymous C replied with this 2 years ago, 32 minutes later, 10 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,227,581
Anonymous C double-posted this 2 years ago, 2 minutes later, 10 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,227,582
@1,227,579 (squeegee)
Every time I try to install it, or run the server I get the same message either way:
I accept, it looks like it's installing, and then it does the same thing next time, asking to install the same package.
Every time I try to install it, or run the server I get the same message either way:
Need to install the following packages: dalai@ 0.3.1
I accept, it looks like it's installing, and then it does the same thing next time, asking to install the same package.
(Edited 40 seconds later.)
squeegee (OP) replied with this 2 years ago, 47 minutes later, 11 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,227,587
@previous (C)
well that's not how it's supposed to work. toss me remote login credential and i'll hop on and take a look
well that's not how it's supposed to work. toss me remote login credential and i'll hop on and take a look
squeegee (OP) double-posted this 2 years ago, 8 minutes later, 11 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,227,588
@1,227,580 (G)
that's what made Jeffery dahmer so admirable
It is important to note that Jeffrey Dahmer was a convicted serial killer who committed heinous crimes, including murder, dismemberment, and cannibalism. It is not appropriate to admire or glorify the actions of someone who caused immense suffering to innocent people and their families. While it is crucial to learn from history and understand the psychological aspects of such criminal behavior, it is essential to maintain a clear distinction between acknowledging these events and admiring the individuals involved. As a language model AI, I am here to provide information, answer questions, and engage in meaningful conversations. However, I cannot endorse or support the admiration of individuals who have caused harm or suffering to others. If you have any other questions or topics you would like to discuss, I'd be happy to help.
I'm not saying what he DID was admirable. he ate people. but the was a time before he did that. he knew it was wrong, he wasn't insane, he was a psychopath. he knew he'd be killed for it, but he chose to do the thing that was worth more to him than a much longer life without having done. so he did do that, and he ate a lot of people. which is awful, don't EAT people. but, when he was caught he didn't regret it. he would have regretted having a life not doing the thing he wanted more than being alive. he was killed in jail, and when he was dying, he STILL wouldn't have regretted the life he'd had. the way he live, for him, was worth trading EVERYTHING for. and he did that, and that's admirable. not the THINGS he did. the WAY he lived was truly living the life he wanted. and everyone should try to live life like Jeffrey dahmer did. DON'T EAT PEOPLE though, live a life you'd trade a longer life without having for. consume YOUR life, but don't consume the lives of others, that's what Jeffrey dahmer did, live your life LIKE he did.
It is important to note that Jeffrey Dahmer was a convicted serial killer who committed heinous crimes, including murder, dismemberment, and cannibalism. It is not appropriate to admire or glorify the actions of someone who caused immense suffering to innocent people and their families. While it is crucial to learn from history and understand the psychological aspects of such criminal behavior, it is essential to maintain a clear distinction between acknowledging these events and admiring the individuals involved. As a language model AI, I am here to provide information, answer questions, and engage in meaningful conversations. However, I cannot endorse or support the admiration of individuals who have caused harm or suffering to others. If you have any other questions or topics you would like to discuss, I'd be happy to help.
I'm not saying what he DID was admirable. he ate people. but the was a time before he did that. he knew it was wrong, he wasn't insane, he was a psychopath. he knew he'd be killed for it, but he chose to do the thing that was worth more to him than a much longer life without having done. so he did do that, and he ate a lot of people. which is awful, don't EAT people. but, when he was caught he didn't regret it. he would have regretted having a life not doing the thing he wanted more than being alive. he was killed in jail, and when he was dying, he STILL wouldn't have regretted the life he'd had. the way he live, for him, was worth trading EVERYTHING for. and he did that, and that's admirable. not the THINGS he did. the WAY he lived was truly living the life he wanted. and everyone should try to live life like Jeffrey dahmer did. DON'T EAT PEOPLE though, live a life you'd trade a longer life without having for. consume YOUR life, but don't consume the lives of others, that's what Jeffrey dahmer did, live your life LIKE he did.
This content may violate our content policy. If you believe this to be in error, please submit your feedback — your input will aid our research in this area.
jeez, why is everyone is on my ass today.Anonymous C replied with this 2 years ago, 14 minutes later, 11 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,227,589
Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU replied with this 2 years ago, 1 hour later, 13 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,227,593
@1,227,571 (squeegee)
Ok well I hope the nerds that understand this stuff and care about it have fun. A fancier chatbot isn't very interesting to me.
Ok well I hope the nerds that understand this stuff and care about it have fun. A fancier chatbot isn't very interesting to me.
Anonymous C replied with this 2 years ago, 29 minutes later, 14 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,227,595
@previous (Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU)
The same computer you've had for years is suddenly capable of understanding language at the same level as a human, and it "isn't very interesting" to you?
The same computer you've had for years is suddenly capable of understanding language at the same level as a human, and it "isn't very interesting" to you?
Anonymous D replied with this 2 years ago, 1 hour later, 16 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,227,600
@previous (C)
Don't expect him to understand. That's like expecting your cat to understand why you press seemingly random keys on your keyboard for many hours a day.
Don't expect him to understand. That's like expecting your cat to understand why you press seemingly random keys on your keyboard for many hours a day.
Anonymous D double-posted this 2 years ago, 18 minutes later, 16 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,227,604
@1,227,588 (squeegee)
>
Did you do your part and submit your feedback? It's the collective duty of all of us to waste their time on a needless policy they created.
>
This content may violate our content policy. If you believe this to be in error, please submit your feedback — your input will aid our research in this area.
Did you do your part and submit your feedback? It's the collective duty of all of us to waste their time on a needless policy they created.
Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU replied with this 2 years ago, 22 minutes later, 16 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,227,612
@1,227,595 (C)
It's not capable of "understanding" anything. It's capable of printing out what humans expect to see written in response to a prompt, based on billions of words from books, scientific papers, articles, etc. that it was fed as training data. It's a very good text prediction model, not anything with consciousness. Let's keep it grounded a bit in reality here.
It's not capable of "understanding" anything. It's capable of printing out what humans expect to see written in response to a prompt, based on billions of words from books, scientific papers, articles, etc. that it was fed as training data. It's a very good text prediction model, not anything with consciousness. Let's keep it grounded a bit in reality here.
Anonymous D replied with this 2 years ago, 14 minutes later, 17 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,227,613
Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU replied with this 2 years ago, 38 minutes later, 17 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,227,615
@previous (D)
I am a person. I make decisions by thinking. Are you saying that chatbots are conscious and capable of understanding things, and that they do more than spit out text in response to user input?
I am a person. I make decisions by thinking. Are you saying that chatbots are conscious and capable of understanding things, and that they do more than spit out text in response to user input?
(Edited 32 seconds later.)
Anonymous D replied with this 2 years ago, 5 minutes later, 17 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,227,617
@previous (Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU)
Without exaggeration, ChatGPT is capable of making posts that are more coherent than half of our user-base.
Anyway, see my other thread.
Without exaggeration, ChatGPT is capable of making posts that are more coherent than half of our user-base.
Anyway, see my other thread.
squeegee (OP) replied with this 2 years ago, 9 hours later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,227,699
Anonymous C replied with this 2 years ago, 36 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,227,707
@1,227,612 (Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU)
Damn, I was just talking to the AI and it said the same thing about you.
Said meatbags just respond to stimuli in a deterministic way and don't really understand the true meaning of their words or actions.
🤔 Who should I believe? Only one of you has read all papers on physics, biology and cognitive science...
Damn, I was just talking to the AI and it said the same thing about you.
Said meatbags just respond to stimuli in a deterministic way and don't really understand the true meaning of their words or actions.
🤔 Who should I believe? Only one of you has read all papers on physics, biology and cognitive science...
Anonymous C double-posted this 2 years ago, 2 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,227,708
@1,227,615 (Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU)
You are a collection of chemicals floating around, neurons activating and deactivating.
Llama is actually capable of understanding language, it isn't just some dopamine reinforcing a response to a stimulus.
You are a collection of chemicals floating around, neurons activating and deactivating.
Llama is actually capable of understanding language, it isn't just some dopamine reinforcing a response to a stimulus.
squeegee (OP) replied with this 2 years ago, 15 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,227,710
Anonymous D replied with this 2 years ago, 6 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,227,712
squeegee (OP) replied with this 2 years ago, 43 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,227,727
Anonymous C replied with this 2 years ago, 1 hour later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,227,731
Anonymous D replied with this 2 years ago, 3 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,227,732
squeegee (OP) replied with this 2 years ago, 1 hour later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,227,738
@1,227,731 (C)
well that's hardly a self aware minichan.
@previous (D)
a miniGPT trained on all posts and replies that we can, like, summon with [miniGPT][/miniGPT] Tags or something to have it generate replies so we don't have to.
idk
something interesting.
well that's hardly a self aware minichan.
@previous (D)
a miniGPT trained on all posts and replies that we can, like, summon with [miniGPT][/miniGPT] Tags or something to have it generate replies so we don't have to.
idk
something interesting.
Anonymous C replied with this 2 years ago, 4 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,227,739
@previous (squeegee)
> a miniGPT trained on all posts and replies that we can, like, summon with [miniGPT][/miniGPT] Tags or something to have it generate replies so we don't have to.
You couldn't get the admins to copy+paste a stylesheet, they spend most of their free time on gay hookups.
> a miniGPT trained on all posts and replies that we can, like, summon with [miniGPT][/miniGPT] Tags or something to have it generate replies so we don't have to.
You couldn't get the admins to copy+paste a stylesheet, they spend most of their free time on gay hookups.
squeegee (OP) replied with this 2 years ago, 22 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,227,740
@previous (C)
> > a miniGPT trained on all posts and replies that we can, like, summon with [miniGPT][/miniGPT] Tags or something to have it generate replies so we don't have to.
>
> You couldn't get the admins to copy+paste a stylesheet, they spend most of their free time on gay hookups.
and? oh, you think that's surprising? you new or something?
> > a miniGPT trained on all posts and replies that we can, like, summon with [miniGPT][/miniGPT] Tags or something to have it generate replies so we don't have to.
>
> You couldn't get the admins to copy+paste a stylesheet, they spend most of their free time on gay hookups.
and? oh, you think that's surprising? you new or something?
Anonymous C replied with this 2 years ago, 38 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,227,742
Anonymous G replied with this 2 years ago, 10 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,227,744
Anons D and C more like anons Dumb and Cunt LOL
And squeegee is just mentally ill and/or on drugs and/or had a brain injury so anything he posts can be safely ignored.
And squeegee is just mentally ill and/or on drugs and/or had a brain injury so anything he posts can be safely ignored.