Topic: MODS PLEASE PUT A STOP TO SQUEEGEE
Anonymous A started this discussion 2 years ago #110,135
the formatting spam and ChatGPT tldr in every thread has gone too far
Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU joined in and replied with this 2 years ago, 2 hours later[^] [v] #1,227,309
I will baleet spam if I see it and you can always report spam if u see it.
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 2 years ago, 1 week later, 1 week after the original post[^] [v] #1,228,749
@previous (Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU)
> I will baleet spam if I see it and you can always report spam if u see it.
Delete the onslaught of SheMale porn
> I will baleet spam if I see it and you can always report spam if u see it.
Delete the onslaught of SheMale porn
Anonymous E joined in and replied with this 2 years ago, 1 minute later, 1 week after the original post[^] [v] #1,228,750
Meta !VJjX0Cpzm2 joined in and replied with this 2 years ago, 9 minutes later, 1 week after the original post[^] [v] #1,228,752
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 2 years ago, 55 seconds later, 1 week after the original post[^] [v] #1,228,754
Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU replied with this 2 years ago, 3 minutes later, 1 week after the original post[^] [v] #1,228,757
@1,228,749 (A)
I am in a busy time at work so I cannot check the fora a lot. Please report spam images and I will check and baleet as appropriate.
I am in a busy time at work so I cannot check the fora a lot. Please report spam images and I will check and baleet as appropriate.
Anonymous E replied with this 2 years ago, 8 minutes later, 1 week after the original post[^] [v] #1,228,759
@previous (Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU)
Yet you have the time to ban every Palestinian that tries to post here, even in the middle of a workday.
Yet you have the time to ban every Palestinian that tries to post here, even in the middle of a workday.
Anonymous F replied with this 2 years ago, 3 minutes later, 1 week after the original post[^] [v] #1,228,761
Anonymous F double-posted this 2 years ago, 24 seconds later, 1 week after the original post[^] [v] #1,228,762
Anonymous B joined in and replied with this 2 years ago, 16 minutes later, 1 week after the original post[^] [v] #1,228,766
@1,228,749 (A)
I doubt anyones sexuality can be proven conclusively with nothing more than probability theory and statistics. I'm not really worried about it personally, but, I kinda wanna see where this is going. I say keep it up. The shemale porn.
And tbh they look way better than the usual circus freak show memes the Hardly boys gang throw up like gang signs in every thread. Fight fire with shemale porn sounded reasonable when squeegee said it with math. Got results.
Maybe just stop baiting it, anon A. We know you're over there baiting it. It follows the same pattern as individual's interests in baiting it. You follow?
I doubt anyones sexuality can be proven conclusively with nothing more than probability theory and statistics. I'm not really worried about it personally, but, I kinda wanna see where this is going. I say keep it up. The shemale porn.
And tbh they look way better than the usual circus freak show memes the Hardly boys gang throw up like gang signs in every thread. Fight fire with shemale porn sounded reasonable when squeegee said it with math. Got results.
Maybe just stop baiting it, anon A. We know you're over there baiting it. It follows the same pattern as individual's interests in baiting it. You follow?
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 2 years ago, 12 minutes later, 1 week after the original post[^] [v] #1,228,772
@1,228,762 (F)
@previous (B)
Matt or whoever the anon is who posts the ugly non passing trans pics has broken your brain squeegee
@previous (B)
Matt or whoever the anon is who posts the ugly non passing trans pics has broken your brain squeegee
Anonymous F replied with this 2 years ago, 1 minute later, 1 week after the original post[^] [v] #1,228,774
Anonymous G joined in and replied with this 2 years ago, 1 minute later, 1 week after the original post[^] [v] #1,228,775
Anonymous H joined in and replied with this 2 years ago, 11 minutes later, 1 week after the original post[^] [v] #1,228,777
Anonymous B replied with this 2 years ago, 1 hour later, 1 week after the original post[^] [v] #1,228,785
@1,228,772 (A)
Oh, believe me, squeegee brain doesn't need anyone's help to function with limited bandwidth. In fact monospectral imaging is a limitation of the sensor rather than an absence of multispectral band emissions not due to some form of filtering or scattering processes. Probably an emission of many hyperspectral narrow bandwidths resolved by multispectral sensors into broadband specral lines would appear quite broken when viewed by monospectral sensors.
But I think I just made that up. Because I don't remember learning that. I just trust my brain to know what it's doing.
Is that what you're doing? Cause idk if that's a good idea.
Oh, believe me, squeegee brain doesn't need anyone's help to function with limited bandwidth. In fact monospectral imaging is a limitation of the sensor rather than an absence of multispectral band emissions not due to some form of filtering or scattering processes. Probably an emission of many hyperspectral narrow bandwidths resolved by multispectral sensors into broadband specral lines would appear quite broken when viewed by monospectral sensors.
But I think I just made that up. Because I don't remember learning that. I just trust my brain to know what it's doing.
Is that what you're doing? Cause idk if that's a good idea.
Anonymous B double-posted this 2 years ago, 2 minutes later, 1 week after the original post[^] [v] #1,228,786
Anonymous B triple-posted this 2 years ago, 53 minutes later, 1 week after the original post[^] [v] #1,228,802
Specifically spin-statistics in which projective representations of the lorentz group quantum field transformations (s=s1+s2) are for Dirac spinors (½,0)¤(0,½) which decompose further in momentum space. A Dirac-spinor valued function u(p), and hu(p)=±½u(p) take values in only one of 2 chiral eigenspaces. Spin-hetero, spin-homo. Even though lorentz invariant to chirality and collectively identify as ½ spin fermions.
I tried explaining all this last October very simply and Kook tried to have me executed over it so I'm going to be super thorough when using uncoupled eigenspaces by analogy instead of 4D gamma matrices.
Again, simple probability theory and statistics.
Of the eigenspaces of helicity.
You think I'm fucking around and that's not my fault. That's your fault.
I'm just saying, they're baiting.
I'ma prove it.
Find out.
I tried explaining all this last October very simply and Kook tried to have me executed over it so I'm going to be super thorough when using uncoupled eigenspaces by analogy instead of 4D gamma matrices.
Again, simple probability theory and statistics.
Of the eigenspaces of helicity.
You think I'm fucking around and that's not my fault. That's your fault.
I'm just saying, they're baiting.
I'ma prove it.
Find out.
(Edited 28 seconds later.)
Anonymous I joined in and replied with this 2 years ago, 4 minutes later, 1 week after the original post[^] [v] #1,228,803
Anonymous B replied with this 2 years ago, 7 minutes later, 1 week after the original post[^] [v] #1,228,804
And I promise you I would rather not be spending my free time doing quantum mechanics matrices to model a comprehensive theory of trans-hetro-homosexuality on decoupled weyl spinors evolution equations but, y'all keep begging for it. And yeah, I can oblige