Topic: FAO: Becky

Erik !AltRitexT6 started this discussion 2 years ago #110,126

Do judges have to use the same toilet in court as the public, defendants and other lawyers?

Anonymous B joined in and replied with this 2 years ago, 59 minutes later[^] [v] #1,227,252

Ohio gentry have "bag men" that follow them around, and keep an open bag under them while they shit.

cccuuunnttt !.cATkimmOo joined in and replied with this 2 years ago, 2 hours later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,227,259

Depends on the court. Some have separate bathrooms for the judge and their staff, some don't.

Anonymous B replied with this 2 years ago, 22 minutes later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,227,260

@previous (cccuuunnttt !.cATkimmOo)
Did you really have a trist with Sharon Kennedy?

Erik !AltRitexT6 (OP) replied with this 2 years ago, 23 minutes later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,227,262

@1,227,259 (cccuuunnttt !.cATkimmOo)
Has there ever been a case of a judge and the defendant who has just got a raw deal meeting in the bathroom?

Anonymous D joined in and replied with this 2 years ago, 2 hours later, 6 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,227,268

@1,227,259 (cccuuunnttt !.cATkimmOo)

> Depends on the court. Some have separate bathrooms for the judge and their staff, some don't.

Ohio is bumfuck. That’s hilarious and also seems like it would be a safety concern having litigants shitting next to a judge unless these courts you go to are so minuscule you mean a single use restroom which also is dumb because you’d have people waiting in line to go

Anonymous D double-posted this 2 years ago, 2 minutes later, 6 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,227,270

“Court is in recess.”

Judge, defendant, public defender, DA, all wait in line to use the same single toilet

Anonymous E joined in and replied with this 2 years ago, 3 hours later, 9 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,227,291

@1,227,268 (D)
In criminal proceedings, the defendants are often under lock and key and aren't just roaming the halls unsupervised.

Anonymous D replied with this 2 years ago, 1 minute later, 10 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,227,292

@previous (E)
Actually a lot of times they arent! But yes that is true sometimes

Anonymous E replied with this 2 years ago, 1 minute later, 10 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,227,293

@previous (D)
Well, yeah, if they're bonded out they're not, but presumably they aren't a huge threat if they are.

Anonymous D replied with this 2 years ago, 4 minutes later, 10 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,227,294

@previous (E)
You don’t even need to be out on bond to be a defendant in a criminal case — and bond isn’t really a safety thing it’s a money making thing

Anonymous D double-posted this 2 years ago, 2 minutes later, 10 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,227,295

I’ve tried making 5 replies and The Board has eaten all of them

Anonymous E replied with this 2 years ago, 46 minutes later, 10 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,227,297

@1,227,294 (D)

> You don’t even need to be out on bond to be a defendant in a criminal case
Never said that you did.

> and bond isn’t really a safety thing it’s a money making thing
It's both.

Anonymous D replied with this 2 years ago, 1 hour later, 12 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,227,302

@previous (E)
Do you have a problem bitchtits or do you wanna have a tit for tat reply war?

Anonymous E replied with this 2 years ago, 22 minutes later, 12 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,227,306

@previous (D)
You tell me, chief. You're the one who started this whole fuckin brouhaha.

Anonymous B replied with this 2 years ago, 2 hours later, 15 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,227,342

@1,227,260 (B)
The silence on this is deafening.

Minichan