spectacles joined in and replied with this 2 years ago, 2 hours later[^][v]#1,226,409
how scared of everythings are you? like, paranoia can be like that, how much a lot scared were you?
if you're being sarcastic then about what? sarcastic about who the person WAS incredulously or sarcastic about how scare a threat this person was incredulously?
see, like, don't pick and choose your justifications and rationalizations so indiscriminately of your actual beliefs and values. you gotta know that makes you look insincere and lack credibility and reduces the value of your entire perspective. thats Matt's shit ass problem. and he'll double down on his convenient lies and insincerity to have the appearance of thinking he APPEARS to believe he was right. as if people think his appearing to THINK he won actually meant he didn't look like an alley cat eating trash and calling it an indoor meal.
like, make fun of this persons lazy appearance and incongruity with social norms for appearing in public as a her. fair enough. kinda dick, but, not wrong. tieng it sarcastically to safety so you accomplish the same thing -insincerely- is still kinda dick, but also damages your character. you don't have to play manipulative games to try and win dumb petty arguments. you can be sincere and win minds.
its a lot harder tho. but maybe is worth it.
reject being a low quality shit tier troll.
pretty sure Matt caught a ban today, lol. I don't know for sure. but that was pretty good, right? he is maaaaad af rn tho. probably plotting. I do everything in-the-moment.
> how scared of everythings are you? like, paranoia can be like that, how much a lot scared were you? > > if you're being sarcastic then about what? sarcastic about who the person WAS incredulously or sarcastic about how scare a threat this person was incredulously? > > see, like, don't pick and choose your justifications and rationalizations so indiscriminately of your actual beliefs and values. you gotta know that makes you look insincere and lack credibility and reduces the value of your entire perspective. thats Matt's shit ass problem. and he'll double down on his convenient lies and insincerity to have the appearance of thinking he APPEARS to believe he was right. as if people think his appearing to THINK he won actually meant he didn't look like an alley cat eating trash and calling it an indoor meal. > > like, make fun of this persons lazy appearance and incongruity with social norms for appearing in public as a her. fair enough. kinda dick, but, not wrong. tieng it sarcastically to safety so you accomplish the same thing -insincerely- is still kinda dick, but also damages your character. you don't have to play manipulative games to try and win dumb petty arguments. you can be sincere and win minds. > > its a lot harder tho. but maybe is worth it. > > reject being a low quality shit tier troll. > > pretty sure Matt caught a ban today, lol. I don't know for sure. but that was pretty good, right? he is maaaaad af rn tho. probably plotting. I do everything in-the-moment.
!MLHqI35Srs joined in and replied with this 2 years ago, 7 minutes later, 13 hours after the original post[^][v]#1,226,475
He's an American diplomat and just defrauds a cheque whilst living in pseudo-non-exile here, and it's not even for a family member or anything. He defrauds a cheque on purpose to demonstrate transsexuality's ponzy-schemal characteristics. Good, good nationalist; older pre-Autphag theoretician who wrote pseudo-Creativity pamphlets. What is the BBC doing letting American attention-seekers de-Flynnificatorily attention-seek media/television? He's not on a bad cheque by American prisoner standards, either. It's like 1 2/3 old-Pictoid OAP.
!MLHqI35Srs replied with this 2 years ago, 1 minute later, 13 hours after the original post[^][v]#1,226,477
@previous (Xlp qkwht)
Is he fuck. The guy has the intellectual accomplishments of a well-suited fraud. Let me repeat that in the dzink, in the yuppal; of a well-suited fraud. Even in British new-curriculum it probably still fetches for some element of A-Level. Yes, in Scotland he's level-fucked but it still fetches grade. Swipe off of it already. He deserves sympathy in IQ proportion:
index($real-grader)/index($am_bull) ___
that'll come to an IQ score of: ~10-25 points; SUB-PROFOUND ANENCEPHALIC RETARDATION. It has a -TION category; it's practical pseudo-anencephalia. Most people of his sort can't get much more than high-singlers.
---------------
Now, do that again.
______ ______
That'll be 0.000000000000000000002 points. ____________________________________