Topic: Female students are suing their sorority after it allowed a trans
Anonymous A started this discussion 2 years ago#110,003
> Female students at the University of Wyoming are suing their sorority after it allowed a trans-identified male to join.
> The suit alleges that Artemis Langford has been "watching" the women undress in the sorority house, sometimes while erect.
> Court records reveal that the young women are alleging Langford had been voyeuristically peeping on them while they were in intimate situations, and, in at least one occasion, had a visible erection while doing so.
> “One sorority member walked down the hall to take a shower, wearing only a towel … She felt an unsettling presence, turned, and saw Mr. Smith watching her silently,” the court document reads.
> “Mr. Smith has, while watching members enter the sorority house, had an erection visible through his leggings,” the suit says. “Other times, he has had a pillow in his lap.”
> The complaint adds that Langford is “sexually interested in women” as evidenced by his Tinder profile “through which he seeks to meet women.” It is further alleged that Langford took photographs of the women while at a sorority slumber party, where he also is said to have made inappropriate comments.
Bro isn’t even trying, he didn’t even wear the color coordinated outfit like the rest of the girls did. Transbianism is a fetish for perverts.
spectacles joined in and replied with this 2 years ago, 1 hour later, 6 hours after the original post[^][v]#1,226,195
I was Greek in college. Delta Sig. Not a queermo academic fraternity, the good kind. a social frat. With discrimination, exclusivity, and robust mechanisms to weed out all but the most capable of conforming to and having strict adherance for the agreed upon and voluntarily subjected to values of the group which included loyalty, group identity, and collective autonomy. Which meant we had plenty of ways to establish up front who was even open to being considered in the first place, of those that were offered an invite they'd get to decide they were choosing to be there.
And really all actives did was make damn sure that is was not fun, it was an excessive obligation, it interfered with everything else, came with no privileges, caused psychological distress, required physical endurance, intensified over time, and took a great amount of perseverance, only people that truly, truly wanted to be part of the group because they saw themselves reflected in the group and were able to overcome the adversity of acceptance got to the point at which hazing started.
Pledges were free to leave at any time. They didn't have to be anyone's friend, and that's all the group offered was freedom of association within the group dynamic.
So.
It's essentially exactly the same as here but recognized as an on campus organization with a lot of legal scrutiny, and so we made damn sure we could trust each other and we did and still do I'm friends with them to this day and they have also absolutely been the most accepting of who I am and how I've changed.
But I'm not greatly surprised by this, there's a fundamental quality about a person's character that's far more intrensic than the qualities that can be adopted, expressed and identified with. A quality that had nothing to do with identity, perception, expression, or self. It's a quality you can only sense from others, you can't sense it in yourself.
Greek organizations were split along gender lines because when most were founded fraternizing as coed groups were illegal.
It's not anymore, and my old group was the first to accept jews and was founded to do that. Was among the first to accept blacks, and gays, and now they do enroll transgenders. It was founded under principles of inclusion, but exclusive inclusion of those people, first men, but now many many more kinds of people, but of those people of the highest order of quality in character.
I didn't write the fraternal preamble or set any of their principles or beliefs. I just seemed to fit in, chose to be there, proved myself, remained included, conformed and adhered to the principles that by that point i'd learned were honor, and that quality of having been bonded to others that you make sacrifices for, it's called brotherhood, or sisterhood, but different orgs call it different things.
Or a bunch of Greeks organizations actually shredded themselves over the last 150 years or so due to going public with hazing deaths, or being dismantled do to drinking related fatalities, or deaths from suicides when people had their minds broken by it, tbh a lot of organizations went "acedemic" and became kinda like clubs with fancy dorms sometimes which I always thought was stupid -and organizations that went "corporate" and kept their gay ass clubhouse to profiteer off of are like the mickey mouse club if they had a hotel for kids to live in.
It's fucking stupid, and they offer nothing except it "looks good" on resumes cause "kappa, kappa, kappa," and I'm glad this is biting them in the ass.
I am not surprised. But, yeah, this wouldn't have happened back in the day. We had ways of dealing with people who had no respect for themselves, and no respect for others.
The fact this is news is an embarrassment. We wouldn't have had to kick the out or anything slacious. They wouldn't have wanted to choose to fit In at some point. Not because of anything done to them, but because of their choosing to be a person of bad quality in character.
Hazing want about beating people up or making them do anything really. Nothing weird or scary or perverse or scandalous. We just told them where the door was.
We just made sure we made that door really, really easy for them to walk right out of.
Cya. Everyone who didn't just really wanted to be there in that moment and no where else.
And fuck that kid for lacking the qualities they claim, and missing the ones that actually matter.
spectacles double-posted this 2 years ago, 9 minutes later, 6 hours after the original post[^][v]#1,226,198
And yeah, I know, tl;Dr. Idgaf
Learn to read you half wit.
Or ignore it and move along. If you have nothing to say, that's fine. You're free to shut up about.
If you feel compelled to explain you lack comprehension, attention, or just want me to hear that you reject knowing my opinions outright without knowing them at all, fuck off u massive pillar of retardation
Unless you put your name behind it so I'll have some kind of value to take from your ideas.