!MLHqI35Srs joined in and replied with this 2 years ago, 45 minutes later, 3 hours after the original post[^][v]#1,226,009
@previous (spectacles)
What is with the S. Amerind sphere and this ridiculously callaepo-pastellaiac way of presenting all forms of media information?
Was chosonic PIP, rythmic sin and cotular-sine, and the use of "ridiculously" (infomatively and lifestylistically-correctly) long text marquees not good enough for them? I've checked some C. Xiatyl continent broadcasts and occasionally they can emulate Korean television for short stints but no one is interested in the Art of Cinematic presentation any longer ;_;. As is more than merely cultural; as is internationally-enforcedly correct.
!MLHqI35Srs replied with this 2 years ago, 13 minutes later, 4 hours after the original post[^][v]#1,226,021
@previous (E)
Mexican and Hondurian media can get the graininess and sharpness-syme of Pallenatory-Boy style animation correct; they know fuck all about the scripted ideology, or the cultural one, however, hence it's watchable for about... *strokes the back of the head* 3-7 minutes. At least in math generations they know that compass was never quite as dead as merely striking a teutonic freak-calculasser semi-occasionally.
Same with Chinese and chosoneo (tr.) "ruggedly subservient ratatoulle". ENGRISH is sometimes a certain old chanboard administrator dropping attention-seeking references and crying on script. We should remember who owns the production company after Calippo's take-over.
!MLHqI35Srs replied with this 2 years ago, 2 minutes later, 4 hours after the original post[^][v]#1,226,028
@previous (spectacles)
I was confiscated of a fuck-tonne of them with a missing DHL/Post Office order.
I've like 4 or 5, really, levels of math to play with (2 years of Brit UG, about 7-21 depending on state of "US" any-tert; some old G-tier prep texts), and only so much endurant energy not to think sleep is preferable.
I sometimes spend 12 hours per day staring at one I'd practically written myself; a prisoner-fought half-slice of gossamer theory stage 4.e (1 and even 2 is now beneath government basic pass; skipping 4, this latter stage is about the basic entrance to post-compulsory schooling or our grade 11/12); this is when stusions (-inf/x') start being used heavily.
Gossamer theorem to remind everyone is the random algorythmic corrector for chance-intellect, in some cases, even; at a customary corrector +/-(A+A=/=x=/=A+A==0) it begins something like G {insert syme here; insert syme here; ...; ...}
spectacles replied with this 2 years ago, 41 minutes later, 5 hours after the original post[^][v]#1,226,033
@previous (!MLHqI35Srs)
oh, no one here has a grasp on infinitesimals, infinities, Riemann sums. get it? non-uniqueness approaches no limit in these simple-terms
!MLHqI35Srs replied with this 2 years ago, 8 minutes later, 5 hours after the original post[^][v]#1,226,034
@1,226,028 (!MLHqI35Srs)
To add: no one has used the thing to calculate integerial IQ for AEONS and it's not particularly useful since the laws of BODMAS are no longer taught beyond varsen-2-and-a-fraction-anymore (if something's an indigenous theory by chance, then people will have the O.{x, x, x, x...} and screw all else). If one's competent, they know enough Psychology theory to know which stages beyond the integeral value Guass (x>200) divide back into Guass-range numbers by plain rote-and-chance without taking to "category law", "custom law", "decoral law", even the annoying inverse-neuro-diversitarian systems trying to emulate authoritarian absolutismships. Most of the time, people only want stages 1 - 4.symal (read: theoretical, that's to say we skip >5 and start "extending things up", a fallacy the Scottish-Irriqois miscegeny communities call "gossamation fallacy"; to evade this a little one can borrow from it) in order to train programmers and some sociological-psychologists. For the latter it's an abstract training excercize; for the former it helps build even desperate, shaky, trailing intellects to properly tackle the discipline on an "at all" basis.
@previous (spectacles)
Riemann sum was all I learned in the last 6 months of leaving year, lol.
Anonymous F joined in and replied with this 2 years ago, 1 hour later, 6 hours after the original post[^][v]#1,226,051
How about you take some accountability for the bullshit you spew, fucking translucent plastic motherfucker. You damn well know that there is no proof that they’re trans and it’s just more scapegoating. The caucasity of this post. Kys.
spectacles replied with this 2 years ago, 21 minutes later, 10 hours after the original post[^][v]#1,226,081
@previous (H)
look at it. it's obviously a font. clearly a font. you'd have to be blind and retarded to look at that and think, hmmm.... could be fake.... but its supposed to be hers. idk.... hmmm.
you're not that dumb. you're obviously not a drooling simpleton. plainly.
you are absolutely an embarrassing coward tho. how many samefags are you? is it 3? I'd believe drooling simpleton too, but I'm just being a bitch cause pmsing.
spectacles replied with this 2 years ago, 25 minutes later, 11 hours after the original post[^][v]#1,226,085
@previous (G)
printed on fake yellow legal pad paper? I guess that makes sense. it's made to look like a mockery, not made to look authentic. someone put the time in to this to best effort at humor. its visual sarcasm. it's not real. because it has too many fake attempts to look not fake. its not crumpled legal pad paper with handwritten faggy handwriting. it's a png of a piece of paper supposed to look like a piece of legal pad paper but looks like a graphic of a 2005 videogame menu screen if it was supposed to be a piece of paper, and the font is just a font. it's not even printed on a piece of paper. this is purely just a png with a font layer badly deformed to badly match the apparent contours on the png of paper, just look at it, don't play dumb.
now I think you made it and re edited it for minichan after you posted it where you intended to post it first. probably 4chan, or kiwifarms or wherever you go to obsess over lady balls? oh, ur not anon h.
well, still. look at it. are you new to the internet child? I'm actually being flattering by assuming you're not that gullible and are trolling. I'd take that as a win.
> look at it. it's obviously a font. clearly a font. you'd have to be blind and retarded to look at that and think, hmmm.... could be fake.... but its supposed to be hers. idk.... hmmm. > > you're not that dumb. you're obviously not a drooling simpleton. plainly. > > you are absolutely an embarrassing coward tho. how many samefags are you? is it 3? I'd believe drooling simpleton too, but I'm just being a bitch cause pmsing.
It does look fake
I’m pretty sure the shooter was trans but it’s silly to blame transness just like in every mass shooter case the shooter was bananas being trans doesn’t have to do with that
Plenty of normal trans people out there just like there are plenty of depressed incels who don’t shoot people