!MLHqI35Srs started this discussion 2 years ago#109,970
I did short-RIPM, for the 3rd('(*)+10th) time; recall, in 2019-2021, negroids had tried to scam me of a RIPM and REPM result-set, respectively, of 134, and 184, and left me with a psychiatrist who just declares everyone has a verbal-IQ score in the 35th (equivalent about 92 3/4 whole-scale points) percentile exactly.
I can't be arsed to screen-cap; these were my genuine results:
!MLHqI35Srs (OP) replied with this 2 years ago, 1 minute later, 12 minutes after the original post[^][v]#1,225,920
@previous (Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU)
It requires a 200 IQ score, both verbal and performance, or above, at non-gear disability speed there-to, to do that. Just as it requires a 400 IQ to learn computer science, 300 to do medicine and about 600-1,200 to learn theoretical physics.
Until then, most Guass-distroers including myself post brain damage are merely factory-heroism material and student patriotic service-people material.
spectacles joined in and replied with this 2 years ago, 7 hours later, 17 hours after the original post[^][v]#1,226,002
Why even bother? IQ means nothing. unless you're motivated a genius and an idiot are at the same level of useful productivity. The measure of a person qualities are by the effects their causes motivate into existence. Be willful and intentional in your actions and follow your interests because you feel compelled to that direction. Just engage with the world in the ways that you cause impactful effects to the best your engagement can be motivated by your passions.
Successful idiots, failed geniuses, there's no such thing as an unsuccessful idiot, there's no such thing as a successful genius. There are only people who achieve their full potential and the people who don't want to.
Be the person who reaches their limit, and push that limit as far as it can go and you'll be better than everyone who thinks they have something to prove.
The result is not worth the effort. Just make the effort worth the result and you'll have it.
!MLHqI35Srs joined in and replied with this 2 years ago, 4 hours later, 21 hours after the original post[^][v]#1,226,010
@1,225,927 (C)
Your IQ is -100 that, Miller. You're from the world's most intellectually impoverished continental culture. To think, even C. Xiatyl beans and proto-Xiatyl bean-ers exceed you. Even coffeed gringoids exceed you. Even Brooklyn Anglo 1/4-breeds exceed you. By 10, 15, and 20 points on 81 respectively.
I can do the old "select random clips and compare it to Mongoloid television" routine if you like, setting it at 107bar?
!MLHqI35Srs double-posted this 2 years ago, 4 minutes later, 21 hours after the original post[^][v]#1,226,011
@1,225,969 (G)
110 would be the functional on-paper down-grade of 131; 148 performance (yes, a post-post-post-gifted score no less) by the way, at age 16, semi-abbreviate scale. (cf. secondary '07 psychometric Raven Intermediarily Abbreviated Metrices)
80 is more realistic these days on processing speed (90-100 psychological-categorical it just has a 0.1 powered "weight"/"torque"), but I don't care for what a pain-killer can do any-more, y'understand; I'll eat cheap and OTC if it has more N A R C I S.
Just do the Aphricus. If it's an E at A(-syme); A5; A4; A3, A2-, AS-, whatever. I'm not picky about what texts I do touch in the subject anymore, even if I only know half of what c > x < c, se.