Topic: Richard Dawkins declares there are only two sexes as matter of science: 'That's all there is to it'
Anonymous A started this discussion 2 years ago #109,847
Anonymous B joined in and replied with this 2 years ago, 20 minutes later[^] [v] #1,225,160
No one is arguing for more than two "biological sexes". We are arguing for more than two "genders". Surely Dawkins understand this and is just being an ass.
Anonymous C joined in and replied with this 2 years ago, 34 minutes later, 55 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,225,164
@previous (B)
Actually, from Googling, it appears that the big debate among scientists is over biological sex and not gender mostly because of intersex conditions that extend beyond of the realms of XX and XY chromosomes.
But who the fuck cares? Richard Dawkins is kind of a fucking retard.
Actually, from Googling, it appears that the big debate among scientists is over biological sex and not gender mostly because of intersex conditions that extend beyond of the realms of XX and XY chromosomes.
But who the fuck cares? Richard Dawkins is kind of a fucking retard.
Anonymous D joined in and replied with this 2 years ago, 11 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #1,225,166
@1,225,160 (B)
> No one is arguing for more than two "biological sexes".
Yes, they absolutely are lmfao. "Sex is a spectrum" retards, many of them American academics, are abundant.
> No one is arguing for more than two "biological sexes".
Yes, they absolutely are lmfao. "Sex is a spectrum" retards, many of them American academics, are abundant.
Anonymous C replied with this 2 years ago, 1 minute later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #1,225,167
@previous (D)
See the post above you, retard. This debate more pertains to intersex condition so it doesn't really work for your anti-tranny shitposting.
See the post above you, retard. This debate more pertains to intersex condition so it doesn't really work for your anti-tranny shitposting.
Anonymous E joined in and replied with this 2 years ago, 5 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #1,225,168
@1,225,166 (D)
I'd like more information. How mainstream is this opinion? Are they talking about something aside from, like, intersex people?
I'd like more information. How mainstream is this opinion? Are they talking about something aside from, like, intersex people?
Anonymous F joined in and replied with this 2 years ago, 57 seconds later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #1,225,169
Father Faex replied with this 2 years ago, 50 seconds later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #1,225,170
@1,225,166 (D)
So, people born with two sets of genitals would fit in your black and white view how, please?
So, people born with two sets of genitals would fit in your black and white view how, please?
Father Niggers !faggot replied with this 2 years ago, 38 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #1,225,174
@1,225,168 (E)
Ideologically-motivated academics point to intersex conditions to declare sex a 'spectrum', which is as absurd as announcing that humans aren't bipedal due to lower limb deformities. US academia is unfortunately fairly ideologically captured.
@1,225,167 (C)
You are demonstrably the most retarded user of this forum.
@1,225,169 (F)
See "Left-Wing" Communism: an Infantile Disorder by the good Vladimir Ilyich! Bless you.
@previous (Father Faex)
I'd point you in the direction of the SRY gene, my friend! Bless you. Humans are sexually dichotomous.
Ideologically-motivated academics point to intersex conditions to declare sex a 'spectrum', which is as absurd as announcing that humans aren't bipedal due to lower limb deformities. US academia is unfortunately fairly ideologically captured.
@1,225,167 (C)
You are demonstrably the most retarded user of this forum.
@1,225,169 (F)
See "Left-Wing" Communism: an Infantile Disorder by the good Vladimir Ilyich! Bless you.
@previous (Father Faex)
I'd point you in the direction of the SRY gene, my friend! Bless you. Humans are sexually dichotomous.
Anonymous E replied with this 2 years ago, 39 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,225,178
@previous (Father Niggers !faggot)
I see. I suppose I vaguely see where they're coming from, but I agree the idea is off-base and not very useful.
I don't see it catching on, though. I mean, how often do you even hear about intersex people?
I see. I suppose I vaguely see where they're coming from, but I agree the idea is off-base and not very useful.
I don't see it catching on, though. I mean, how often do you even hear about intersex people?
Anonymous B replied with this 2 years ago, 20 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,225,180
Anonymous G joined in and replied with this 2 years ago, 21 minutes later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,225,183
@1,225,160 (B)
There's two genders: masculine and feminine.
Nonbinary is not a third gender, it's a rejection of gender.
There is no third gender.
There's two genders: masculine and feminine.
Nonbinary is not a third gender, it's a rejection of gender.
There is no third gender.
Anonymous B replied with this 2 years ago, 10 minutes later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,225,184
Anonymous G replied with this 2 years ago, 20 minutes later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,225,185
Anonymous C replied with this 2 years ago, 1 minute later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,225,186
boof joined in and replied with this 2 years ago, 23 minutes later, 4 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,225,188
Anonymous I joined in and replied with this 2 years ago, 1 hour later, 5 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,225,190
Anonymous G replied with this 2 years ago, 5 minutes later, 5 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,225,191
@previous (I)
It's not transphobic to say there are two genders.
You can acknowledge there's two and be fine with people switching between the two.
It's not transphobic to say there are two genders.
You can acknowledge there's two and be fine with people switching between the two.
Anonymous I replied with this 2 years ago, 1 minute later, 5 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,225,192
@previous (G)
> It's not transphobic to say there are two genders.
>
> You can acknowledge there's two and be fine with people switching between the two.
He is both transphobic and a believer in only two genders. Thanks.
> It's not transphobic to say there are two genders.
>
> You can acknowledge there's two and be fine with people switching between the two.
He is both transphobic and a believer in only two genders. Thanks.
Anonymous G replied with this 2 years ago, 34 minutes later, 6 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,225,195
@previous (I)
Matt helped smuggle estrogen into Louisiana so a group of prostitutes could get the medication they needed.
That doesn't sound like a transphobe to me.
Matt helped smuggle estrogen into Louisiana so a group of prostitutes could get the medication they needed.
That doesn't sound like a transphobe to me.
!MLHqI35Srs joined in and replied with this 2 years ago, 1 day later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,225,321
He knows all grade varsens of American -100 science in every book he has proto-typally presentatively and pre-typatively cryptically written, sayeth Ok-chu, plainly.
I don't care that he can GAY-LON clan by rote-writing Final Retrospections 1,000 Asperger sub-retardation fetish times, this is how much respect he commands in Chosun. He can be righter than right, it's pseudo-tributive now, in that Guass distrribution intellectual ability was declared a 70-IQ Pellice-continent trick about 50 years' ago (the legal 30 years ago) now.
I don't care that he can GAY-LON clan by rote-writing Final Retrospections 1,000 Asperger sub-retardation fetish times, this is how much respect he commands in Chosun. He can be righter than right, it's pseudo-tributive now, in that Guass distrribution intellectual ability was declared a 70-IQ Pellice-continent trick about 50 years' ago (the legal 30 years ago) now.
(Edited 3 minutes later.)
!MLHqI35Srs double-posted this 2 years ago, 1 minute later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,225,322
@1,225,195 (G)
Precisely what I refer to in no manner of absent parity-to=parity ethnogroup substa involved.
@previous (!MLHqI35Srs)
Precisely what I refer to in no manner of absent parity-to=parity ethnogroup substa involved.
@previous (!MLHqI35Srs)