Topic: Job listings that don't say what they pay
Anonymous A started this discussion 2 years ago #109,825
100% of the time it means paying far below market rate for the position. I refuse to even apply to such jobs. It's really making it difficult when job hunting since over half of the job listings I see online don't list the pay. "No one wants to work" they say. But the truth is "no wants to pay for work."
Anonymous B joined in and replied with this 2 years ago, 20 minutes later[^] [v] #1,225,071
Correct.
Anonymous C joined in and replied with this 2 years ago, 1 hour later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,225,075
Heard recently- "Take it, or leave it."
Anonymous D joined in and replied with this 2 years ago, 1 minute later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,225,077
You don't want to work. Admit it
Anonymous C replied with this 2 years ago, 1 hour later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,225,091
@previous (D)
Not for $20 per hour. The liberals said I deserve a livable wage, which is $50 per hour.
Not for $20 per hour. The liberals said I deserve a livable wage, which is $50 per hour.
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 2 years ago, 48 minutes later, 4 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,225,099
@previous (C)
> Not for $20 per hour.
That's cute, honey. You're clearly out of touch. Try $10 per hour, which is not enough for anyone to live on.
> Not for $20 per hour.
That's cute, honey. You're clearly out of touch. Try $10 per hour, which is not enough for anyone to live on.
Anonymous E joined in and replied with this 2 years ago, 16 minutes later, 5 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,225,103
Come to California where minimum wage is $20 per hour and a 600 sq ft studio is $2400 a month
boof joined in and replied with this 2 years ago, 52 minutes later, 5 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,225,107
Jeepers, it's like the little guy hasn't got a chance in this world
Anonymous G joined in and replied with this 2 years ago, 11 minutes later, 6 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,225,108
@1,225,103 (E)
Liberal policies are designed to move wealth from men to women.
Since men are the ones who actually build housing in 99% of cases, that means workers aren't going to be paid fairly, and thus housing doesn't get built.
Meanwhile do-nothing government mandated job positions are paid highly and incentivized to hire women.
Liberal policies are designed to move wealth from men to women.
Since men are the ones who actually build housing in 99% of cases, that means workers aren't going to be paid fairly, and thus housing doesn't get built.
Meanwhile do-nothing government mandated job positions are paid highly and incentivized to hire women.
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 2 years ago, 30 minutes later, 6 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,225,110
Anonymous C replied with this 2 years ago, 1 minute later, 6 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,225,111
Anonymous E replied with this 2 years ago, 38 minutes later, 7 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,225,112
@1,225,108 (G)
> Liberal policies are designed to move wealth from men to women.
>
> Since men are the ones who actually build housing in 99% of cases, that means workers aren't going to be paid fairly, and thus housing doesn't get built.
>
> Meanwhile do-nothing government mandated job positions are paid highly and incentivized to hire women.
One of the biggest problems here in California is there is no new housing built
> Liberal policies are designed to move wealth from men to women.
>
> Since men are the ones who actually build housing in 99% of cases, that means workers aren't going to be paid fairly, and thus housing doesn't get built.
>
> Meanwhile do-nothing government mandated job positions are paid highly and incentivized to hire women.
One of the biggest problems here in California is there is no new housing built
Anonymous H joined in and replied with this 2 years ago, 25 minutes later, 7 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,225,116
@1,225,110 (A)
There's 2 factions in the country, attributing some of the countries problems on one of those factions isn't making them a boogeyman.
Libs want to tax workers, land developers, and anyone who invests in housing. They add other burdens to all those groups, and then when no one wants to provide housing they blame others.
There's 2 factions in the country, attributing some of the countries problems on one of those factions isn't making them a boogeyman.
Libs want to tax workers, land developers, and anyone who invests in housing. They add other burdens to all those groups, and then when no one wants to provide housing they blame others.
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 2 years ago, 44 minutes later, 8 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,225,119
Anonymous I joined in and replied with this 2 years ago, 49 seconds later, 8 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,225,120
> $200K range in payWhenever they give a range, it's the low-end that they'll actually offer.
(Edited 33 seconds later.)