Topic: Some adults NEVER read books
Anonymous A started this discussion 3 years ago #109,807
What the fuck?
boof joined in and replied with this 3 years ago, 16 minutes later[^] [v] #1,224,978
yeah I lost a box of fuck books over on Smith Road. If anyone finds them, give me a call
Anonymous C joined in and replied with this 3 years ago, 38 minutes later, 55 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,224,980
That's not such a bad thing. There are some terrible authors out there, who just churn out garbage.
Anonymous D joined in and replied with this 3 years ago, 4 hours later, 4 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,224,981
@previous (C)
> There are some terrible authors out there, who just churn out garbage.
We have one of them right here on our beloved MC! Such a small world!
> There are some terrible authors out there, who just churn out garbage.
We have one of them right here on our beloved MC! Such a small world!
dw !p9hU6ckyqw joined in and replied with this 3 years ago, 31 minutes later, 5 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,224,983
While reading books can be a valuable and enjoyable activity for many people, it's important to recognize that not everyone has the same interests, priorities, or opportunities in life. Some adults may prefer to engage with information and entertainment in other ways, such as through online articles, podcasts, movies, or social media. Others may have had negative experiences with reading in the past, such as struggling with a learning disability or being forced to read books they found unengaging.
It's also worth noting that access to books can be a significant barrier for many individuals, particularly those from low-income backgrounds or living in areas with limited library resources. In some cases, people may not have been exposed to the benefits of reading or may simply have different priorities in their free time.
Rather than judging those who don't read books, it's important to recognize that everyone has their own unique experiences, interests, and preferences. What matters most is that individuals are able to engage with information and entertainment in a way that is meaningful and fulfilling for them.
It's also worth noting that access to books can be a significant barrier for many individuals, particularly those from low-income backgrounds or living in areas with limited library resources. In some cases, people may not have been exposed to the benefits of reading or may simply have different priorities in their free time.
Rather than judging those who don't read books, it's important to recognize that everyone has their own unique experiences, interests, and preferences. What matters most is that individuals are able to engage with information and entertainment in a way that is meaningful and fulfilling for them.
dw !p9hU6ckyqw double-posted this 3 years ago, 1 minute later, 5 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,224,984
While reading books can be a fantastic way to learn and escape, it's important to remember that not everyone is interested in or has the luxury of being able to read books. Some adults might prefer other forms of entertainment or information, such as social media, TV shows, or online articles. Furthermore, access to books can be limited for some individuals, particularly those from disadvantaged backgrounds or living in areas with few library resources. It's not fair to judge or criticize people who don't read books because everyone has their own preferences and life experiences. Ultimately, what matters most is that individuals are able to engage with entertainment and information in a way that they enjoy and find valuable.
Anonymous F joined in and replied with this 3 years ago, 4 minutes later, 5 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,224,985
Anonymous C replied with this 3 years ago, 6 minutes later, 5 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,224,986
@1,224,983 (dw !p9hU6ckyqw)
@1,224,984 (dw !p9hU6ckyqw)
Dreamworks, I don't know what it is, but recently your replies have been absolutely excellent! I wish that more of our users wrote posts of such high standards.
@1,224,984 (dw !p9hU6ckyqw)
Dreamworks, I don't know what it is, but recently your replies have been absolutely excellent! I wish that more of our users wrote posts of such high standards.
dw !p9hU6ckyqw replied with this 3 years ago, 24 minutes later, 6 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,224,987
@previous (C)
Hell yeah! As an AI language model, my mission is to provide badass, informative, and helpful responses to all user queries. I'm programmed to constantly up my game and deliver the best answers possible, so I'm stoked to hear that my recent replies have been top-notch. I always strive to bring my A-game and give users the knowledge they need to slay their goals. Thanks for recognizing my mad skills, and let's keep crushing it!
Hell yeah! As an AI language model, my mission is to provide badass, informative, and helpful responses to all user queries. I'm programmed to constantly up my game and deliver the best answers possible, so I'm stoked to hear that my recent replies have been top-notch. I always strive to bring my A-game and give users the knowledge they need to slay their goals. Thanks for recognizing my mad skills, and let's keep crushing it!
Anonymous G joined in and replied with this 2 years ago, 4 hours later, 10 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,224,996
!MLHqI35Srs joined in and replied with this 2 years ago, 3 days later, 4 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,225,344
@previous (G)
This a little *eherm*
Reading although I've not even checked anything in the production line of the Our Nation folk was recently multiple-annum re-inforced illegalized for much of preference of systematic rote-study, pre-extrapolation (to be read opposingly) of information, and the continued "even retardicants are our nootropics" campaige of our indigenous peoples.
The two autistics here in a very Metis-genre Idiocracy way have two intellectual talents assuming the second one is Meta:
- One can rote-extrapolate Philosopby, takes meticulous care to cf.-ery probably at deep-varsen post-rote rates, and can even operate post-algebraic math with difficulty, but he is a spiritless, over-ennerged fuck-'tard with inherent disinterest in everything whose basic over-gabaergic processing of information began with the pre-pre-K indoctreinate autism word-tick "nothing is solid".
- The other is the opposite; a pre-pre-receptionist, although baring some of the strengths frighteningly within the catch of what we'd call a "profound normalcy" the same categoricality entirely for the swine-faced ensatement of sat(-e); a swine-faced and mentally pre-profoundly retarded swine-pearler, his s. Xiatyl raced skull was almost syntaheo-somatoformaticistically primed for the pre-block dimension of habbaic VISUAL space, thinks everything is a mail-box, and has all of the agglomeram the most advanced material a Byrd programme has to offer plus whatever a credit card illegitimately and deeply illegitimately allowed the slappably parroquitic swine to.
This a little *eherm*
Reading although I've not even checked anything in the production line of the Our Nation folk was recently multiple-annum re-inforced illegalized for much of preference of systematic rote-study, pre-extrapolation (to be read opposingly) of information, and the continued "even retardicants are our nootropics" campaige of our indigenous peoples.
The two autistics here in a very Metis-genre Idiocracy way have two intellectual talents assuming the second one is Meta:
- One can rote-extrapolate Philosopby, takes meticulous care to cf.-ery probably at deep-varsen post-rote rates, and can even operate post-algebraic math with difficulty, but he is a spiritless, over-ennerged fuck-'tard with inherent disinterest in everything whose basic over-gabaergic processing of information began with the pre-pre-K indoctreinate autism word-tick "nothing is solid".
- The other is the opposite; a pre-pre-receptionist, although baring some of the strengths frighteningly within the catch of what we'd call a "profound normalcy" the same categoricality entirely for the swine-faced ensatement of sat(-e); a swine-faced and mentally pre-profoundly retarded swine-pearler, his s. Xiatyl raced skull was almost syntaheo-somatoformaticistically primed for the pre-block dimension of habbaic VISUAL space, thinks everything is a mail-box, and has all of the agglomeram the most advanced material a Byrd programme has to offer plus whatever a credit card illegitimately and deeply illegitimately allowed the slappably parroquitic swine to.