Topic: Holland now ruled by right-wing bumpkins

Anonymous A started this discussion 3 years ago #109,763

https://www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-64967513

Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU joined in and replied with this 3 years ago, 19 minutes later[^] [v] #1,224,784

Should've just let them use the fertilizer.

Anonymous C joined in and replied with this 3 years ago, 25 minutes later, 45 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,224,787

Well I guess that's better than being ruled by right wing blumpkins.

dw !p9hU6ckyqw joined in and replied with this 3 years ago, 1 hour later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #1,224,789

They're not right wing

Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 3 years ago, 58 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,224,790

@previous (dw !p9hU6ckyqw)

> They're not right wing

Are you doubting the BBC?

"Although their policies are very much focused on opposing the government's environmental policies, he told the BBC most people would characterise them as a right-wing, populist party that was quite anti-EU, anti-immigration and in favour of banning burkas for Muslims"

Erik !AltRitexT6 joined in and replied with this 3 years ago, 57 minutes later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,224,793

@1,224,789 (dw !p9hU6ckyqw)
Are you claiming to be an expert on Holland?

dw !p9hU6ckyqw replied with this 3 years ago, 16 minutes later, 4 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,224,794

@1,224,790 (A)
You could just read their elections programme

dw !p9hU6ckyqw double-posted this 3 years ago, 51 seconds later, 4 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,224,795

Also I want to point out that the rest of this topics title is incorrect as well

dw !p9hU6ckyqw triple-posted this 3 years ago, 28 seconds later, 4 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,224,796

@1,224,793 (Erik !AltRitexT6)
No I only lived there like two years

Anonymous C replied with this 3 years ago, 12 minutes later, 4 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,224,798

I just read the article and I have no comment besides what in the fuck is that title? "Farmers' protest party win shock Dutch vote victory". I can not parse what the hell they are trying to convey here. I mean I get it from the context of the article, but what an abortion of a title. What is the subject? The verb? It's like they accidentally put keywords in the title field when publishing the article. It almost reads like it was written by an AI ten years ago when AI still sucked at writing.

Anonymous C double-posted this 3 years ago, 11 minutes later, 4 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,224,799

@previous (C)
Oh okay I think I get it. Maybe I'm just retarded but it shouldn't take this long to parse a title. Win is indeed the verb here. It is referring to the party as "Farmers' protest party" (subject) who "win" (verb) a "shock Dutch vote victory" (object), as in a voting victory that is shocking. Fucking hell.

Anonymous F joined in and replied with this 3 years ago, 30 minutes later, 4 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,224,805

@1,224,798 (C)
This might be because I was already aware of Holland having a "farmers' party", but I understood it immediately.

dw !p9hU6ckyqw replied with this 3 years ago, 1 hour later, 6 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,224,815

@1,224,798 (C)
It also leaves out the not unimportant detail of these being provincial elections

dw !p9hU6ckyqw double-posted this 3 years ago, 1 minute later, 6 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,224,816

@1,224,805 (F)
What's a shock Dutch vote victory

Minichan