Topic: I have a criticism for the writers in the philosophical discipline
boof started this discussion 3 years ago #109,276 Too wordy for my liking
Father Merrin !u5oFWxmY7U joined in and replied with this 3 years ago , 6 minutes later[^] [v] #1,221,568 @OP
> Too wordy for my liking
Try Wittgenstein.
Kim Jeong-il V !MLHqI35Srs joined in and replied with this 2 years ago , 1 month later, 1 month after the original post[^] [v] #1,225,468 I'be grown addicted to using prepositicizationaicization marks; not the mid-G'eek queer stuff either,
I have started to agree with this view when thinking about the value of philoosophy. We can burn word philosophy now. There's no Nero's Zarathum to constern ourselves anymore.
Anonymous B replied with this 2 years ago , 2 hours later, 1 month after the original post[^] [v] #1,225,480 @1,221,568 (Father Merrin !u5oFWxmY7U)
> > Too wordy for my liking
>
> Try Wittgenstein.
Was about to post this and realised I already had.
(Edited 32 seconds later.)
boof (OP) replied with this 2 years ago , 4 hours later, 1 month after the original post[^] [v] #1,225,500 well he used some words too, German ones!
Anonymous B replied with this 2 years ago , 9 minutes later, 1 month after the original post[^] [v] #1,225,502 @previous (boof )
Very few. He dealt mostly in incomprehensible symbols and 'truth functions'. Try this gibberish on for size:
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tractatus_Logico-Philosophicus !MLHqI35Srs joined in and replied with this 2 years ago , 17 hours later, 1 month after the original post[^] [v] #1,225,629 @previous (B)
Truth functions were taught by the compulsory stage at my time. Stop trying to bullshit IQ-80 US-indig. race/interceage people.
Anonymous E joined in and replied with this 2 years ago , 45 minutes later, 1 month after the original post[^] [v] #1,225,633 @1,225,502 (B)
Entire book reads like an autphag post.
!MLHqI35Srs replied with this 2 years ago , 6 minutes later, 1 month after the original post[^] [v] #1,225,641 @previous (E)
If it has to
read like anything, he doesn't understand truth functions.
↕