spectacles joined in and replied with this 3 years ago, 4 hours later, 6 hours after the original post[^][v]#1,219,351
👁️👃👁️
👄 👂🫴
🫲 -not gonna lie, this is the first that I'm hearing about it. what are you talking about? which one of these boofgenders told you that? you can't trust a boofgender. you have no idea who, or even what a boofgender is and or even lying about. I told brie and kook they were wasting their lives to be mean on the internet, like they're poor people. and to get a life that's worth having the money to do nothing. they can do nothing and travel the world in their own personal train if they want. instead they instigate boofgender gaslighting, because I said gay guys on grindr don't try to fuck me, i go out with cis guys who self identify as hetrosexuals.
kook took exception to the fact that I've had sex, ridiculed me for nearly dying from a bacterial infection of my brain, blood and everything in between. and then spread gossip in which she mischaracterized everything I said out of context with invented motives and false justifications she attributed to me being "a perverted sexual deviate with no self-worth, that no one could ever love, will die alone, and loved to be sexually abused," because I asked her to stop mocking my being sexually assaulted at gun point - which led to my illness and near death, which resulted from my doctor's legally actionable negligent malpractice. which continued for a month until she had everyone gaslighting me, telling me none of it happened, I was a meth head, and was going to suicide, and kook even started suggesting ways in which I may do that, and attempted to make me beg for money because she assumed I was living on the street.
and that's when I told kook that she likes to fuck dogs. said that I wouldn't let her piss on me if I was on fire and dying.
and then tried to breakup all of minichan by calling it as I saw it, a waste of 12 years of my life thinking I had any actual friends here, told everyone they had done the same, called everyone losers, suggested that gaslighting with revisionist mischaracterizations and telling me what my motivations are is boofgender for paradoxical axiomatic epistemological reasoning.
that a seemingly absurd self-evident question, such as why "do you keep seeing the things written on the board" that are revisionist mischaracterizations of that which is implied to be unquestionable self-evident motivation to want to cause that person harm, and thinking - TAUTOLOGY
you're a boofgender.
your brain is stupider than you think, when you think you're being smart about it?
boofgender ontology, being paradoxical in the unquestionable and self-evident way, should use tautologically to try and create both motivation AND revisionist mischaracterizations about the way I FEEL about someone AND what I was trying to do to that someone, that by virtue of the logical form: "answer a question, by giving the answer as a question you're asking that's the answer you're asking to be answered the first time you asked, that this builds theory of knowledge upon which to draw a set of consistent counterfactual truths that begs the answer:
your brain is stupider than you think, when you think you're being smart about it?
yeah, I see what you did there, you think you're clever?
boofgenders beg the question that THEY WANT to answer TO beg the answer to the question THEY WANT begged in the question.
to answer correctly:
I don't hate kook. I called her trash and said she fucks dogs.
and I dont care if they break up or stay together. I think she's trash, and I told my friend I think she's trash.
and I said go have an adventure for a year and travel and do all the amazing things they can imagine, whatever they want, go fly an airplane.
or rent a beach house and learn photography, or have a party, and they'll figure out who want what. people can't help who they are, they can only fake what they aren't. and it shows through what they do not the words that say they did them.
you know what happens, don't believe when people tell you what benefits them is to doubt yourself, and to feel bad for believing you know you're right.
that's what I told brie. and if someone gas lights you they do it non stop. its never ending.
And so after kook did all that exact stuff to me that this threads circular self validating and counterfactual logic points to being incredibly transparent and stupid belief there is benefit for them, after all that I left for 4 month or more.
and it appears that a whole bunch more got said about me and kook never stopped, id imagine she'd be right back on here doing the same shit if she knew I was posting again.
but, idk. you're a boofgender asking stupid ass questions. why do you want them to stay together or something?
there's some kind of outcome that benefits you or you'd use less "sophisticated" stupid questions. don't you think?
spectacles replied with this 3 years ago, 11 minutes later, 8 hours after the original post[^][v]#1,219,356
and I say if they are having relationship issues goto marriage counseling, and believe in something that validates them both objectively especially if one of them seems to be the one in charge of history and deciding who has valid feelings. and if they can't manage to agree to work on issues as a couple like adults that value each other then as I've said before, nothing I can say would fix anyone's marriage, no way anything I can say would break anyone's marriage. all I can do is say, dang, y'all, that's some real fine stupid gasworks that's all lit up.
her marital problems are squeegee's fault?
I get way too much credit for stuff y'all did.
also, think about the off line conversations that would have to still be going on if I'm a point In conversation.
get marriage counseling is what I'd say to do.
and just let this three be the one to refer questions to.
I don't hate kook, I think she won't change and thinks she's trash.
said get a life and see how it goes, see who each other is and believe it
wished the best. and think said luck. the thread's still there, oh , but
OP has read around the board and didn't read the one to brie from squeegee. I call boofgender.
what does OP get out of asking anyway? stupid trolling by some random boofgender?
tautological trolling isn't as common as others. and they're pretty similarly constructed. so, some obsessed random troll?
I think meta, fake anon, svet, boof, oh green for sure, chilidog, absolutely not any of them
this is like clue, y'all
ok, who else, Becky is a lawyer or like a paralegal or whatever, so a tautological conceived under any ontology EXCEPT when reasoning to use it as the method by which to establish a base of knowledge for the tautological counterfactual's consistency be regarded as TRUTH, is kinda too sophisticated a logical framework as Matt generally shit posts, I have seen him do tautological trolling before, Becky is smart enough to follow all of this even if she skims it.
post hoc, ergo propter hoc. if Becky is a lawyer, then she wakes up too early to be a shitposting at a this level of shitstorm brewing. no. this would have been a big long fight thread if she thinks I'm this stupid, which she does, I won't lie, so, I think Becky is more cuuuuuuunt boofgender than Matt boofgender, cuuuunt boofgender is mean to me boofgender.
I always know its Becky when she really tries to hurt my feelings, because I know she loves me and my cat does the same thing when she tries to disembowel my arm with her hind legs kicking me. I'd be dead if she hated me. and so I tolerate it, because I'm scared of her. the moment I stop being funny and she's trying to hurt my feelings, if I survive that it, we're cat married. that's how they get you. I just can't see myself being allowed to survive that.
so it can't be Becky. she loves me too much to see if I survive being murdered to be married. so sort of a neutral. which is still better that everyone but fake anon.
kook would be the obvious stupid choice. ill come back to this because it's probably not kook.
unless it's tthe, who I don't actually know. so I can't say that was or wasn't tthe.
Matt has been pretty much in the top 2 here whole time.
30:1 tteh
10:1 kook
3:1 Matt
and if I were gambling on motivation, its always just greed with people isn't it.
the one who gains the most - or in this case thinks they gain most - is usually most culpable. because they seek it.
and this was some bargain basement seeking.
I figure Matt has an interest in predatory behavior since we've seen it before. probably got himself thinking he'd be GOOD for brie as a friend, and kook is trash, in his opinion this time even if I happen to agree, that separating them will open a way for him to be the new kook. but "friend" kook. and I'd say to brie, hey brie, I can't tell you how to manage your money, but I would make sure that if anyone ever ASKS YOU FOR FAVORS OR MONEY or suggests that you spend your money, or do anything THAT BENEFITS THEM with your money, that you draw a hardline you will NEVER give money to anyone who WANTS IT, ASKS FOR IT, OR TALKS ABOUT MONEY in ways that seem like they're dropping hints.
and you decide for yourself within the boundaries of you and your partner's decision making arrangement, who you gift money to, or donate to, or spend on, Kinda exclusively. that's how you remain to be the person you choose to be, without the manipulative money grubbing dishonest greedy social engineering that's going on here.
just tell all your friends that you don't consider beggars to be friends. and if they're beggars and press you for anything they want, give them nothing.
and let them be free friends, like true friends because friendships and relationships are not transactional, and they will get bored and go fuck themselves.
but, to be clear, brie will give me nothing, I will not take anything, not money, not a soda pop. I will never ask, and if I do ever ask, brie, dont, I don't need it. I dont want it. I dont want benefit from it. I dont want to tell you how to manage it, these are suggestions, and ill never make any more, I wash my hand of future mention of my thoughts about anything having to do with it.
if you and kook adventure near Houston get ahold of meta, and the 4 of us can grab a beverage at metals favorite bisexual public food and beverage place. I'll buy you a round and kook and I can have our slap fight.
oh, same with kook, I dont want shit from yall. but I'd buy y'all drinks and kook can slap me, that's it. because that's the way I've always had friends. speaking personally.
and i wish y'all the best, good luck, and all that.
spectacles replied with this 3 years ago, 37 minutes later, 9 hours after the original post[^][v]#1,219,361
@1,219,355 (Erik !AltRitexT6)
aw, that was nice of him. I didn't know that.
@1,219,354 (Meta !Sober//iZs)
well, I'll take your word on that. if you ever have questions about cis gender sex I'll be happy to answer. its interesting because they're not exactly opposites. lesbian sex is opposites, having sex with a woman is just like having sex with a man, but exactly 25% of the way inbetween two men having sex, which is 75% different than either MwM or LwL sex. math is cool, right. vagina is really pretty not bad.
svet said that you had a crush on me. but I think he said it cause he's got a crush on me.
I have a boyfriend, but y'all are both sweet, I ❤ u 2. and becky has dibs on me anyway, that's just a precaution,
see, Becky, I'm more ur cat than anyone's here. unless r04r comes back.
👁️👃👁️
👄 👂 -it's just that I know r04r is Dutch lesbian, and that sounds Hella fun. even with the neutering.
👇 but becky, if I'm ur cat, and you dont murder me first, then the only way this works is you have to fuck me. a lot.
🫴 because I will not be the man in this relationship. and that means you can't neuter me. you'll be needing those bits
spectacles replied with this 3 years ago, 38 minutes later, 11 hours after the original post[^][v]#1,219,418
@previous (A)
ur a boofgender, you nosex genderless boof anon boofgender. use the search feature and search "boof your singular pronoun"
and it's basically just 3rd grade Grammar, apparently no one remembers things they learned.
but explained as an inescapable self-fulfilling antecedent establishing paradox retroactively proving them wrong.
or something like that. I just make stuff up.
> 👁️👃👁️ > 👄 👂🫴 > 🫲 -not gonna lie, this is the first that I'm hearing about it. what are you talking about? which one of these boofgenders told you that? you can't trust a boofgender. you have no idea who, or even what a boofgender is and or even lying about. I told brie and kook they were wasting their lives to be mean on the internet, like they're poor people. and to get a life that's worth having the money to do nothing. they can do nothing and travel the world in their own personal train if they want. instead they instigate boofgender gaslighting, because I said gay guys on grindr don't try to fuck me, i go out with cis guys who self identify as hetrosexuals. > kook took exception to the fact that I've had sex, ridiculed me for nearly dying from a bacterial infection of my brain, blood and everything in between. and then spread gossip in which she mischaracterized everything I said out of context with invented motives and false justifications she attributed to me being "a perverted sexual deviate with no self-worth, that no one could ever love, will die alone, and loved to be sexually abused," because I asked her to stop mocking my being sexually assaulted at gun point - which led to my illness and near death, which resulted from my doctor's legally actionable negligent malpractice. which continued for a month until she had everyone gaslighting me, telling me none of it happened, I was a meth head, and was going to suicide, and kook even started suggesting ways in which I may do that, and attempted to make me beg for money because she assumed I was living on the street. > > and that's when I told kook that she likes to fuck dogs. said that I wouldn't let her piss on me if I was on fire and dying. > > and then tried to breakup all of minichan by calling it as I saw it, a waste of 12 years of my life thinking I had any actual friends here, told everyone they had done the same, called everyone losers, suggested that gaslighting with revisionist mischaracterizations and telling me what my motivations are is boofgender for paradoxical axiomatic epistemological reasoning. > > that a seemingly absurd self-evident question, such as why "do you keep seeing the things written on the board" that are revisionist mischaracterizations of that which is implied to be unquestionable self-evident motivation to want to cause that person harm, and thinking - TAUTOLOGY > > you're a boofgender. > > your brain is stupider than you think, when you think you're being smart about it? > > boofgender ontology, being paradoxical in the unquestionable and self-evident way, should use tautologically to try and create both motivation AND revisionist mischaracterizations about the way I FEEL about someone AND what I was trying to do to that someone, that by virtue of the logical form: "answer a question, by giving the answer as a question you're asking that's the answer you're asking to be answered the first time you asked, that this builds theory of knowledge upon which to draw a set of consistent counterfactual truths that begs the answer: > > your brain is stupider than you think, when you think you're being smart about it? > yeah, I see what you did there, you think you're clever? > > boofgenders beg the question that THEY WANT to answer TO beg the answer to the question THEY WANT begged in the question. > > to answer correctly: > I don't hate kook. I called her trash and said she fucks dogs. > and I dont care if they break up or stay together. I think she's trash, and I told my friend I think she's trash. > and I said go have an adventure for a year and travel and do all the amazing things they can imagine, whatever they want, go fly an airplane. > or rent a beach house and learn photography, or have a party, and they'll figure out who want what. people can't help who they are, they can only fake what they aren't. and it shows through what they do not the words that say they did them. > > you know what happens, don't believe when people tell you what benefits them is to doubt yourself, and to feel bad for believing you know you're right. > > that's what I told brie. and if someone gas lights you they do it non stop. its never ending. > > And so after kook did all that exact stuff to me that this threads circular self validating and counterfactual logic points to being incredibly transparent and stupid belief there is benefit for them, after all that I left for 4 month or more. > > and it appears that a whole bunch more got said about me and kook never stopped, id imagine she'd be right back on here doing the same shit if she knew I was posting again. > > but, idk. you're a boofgender asking stupid ass questions. why do you want them to stay together or something? > there's some kind of outcome that benefits you or you'd use less "sophisticated" stupid questions. don't you think? > > go fuck your wife.
from the length of this text, I can attest to the validity of the "claim" to "be" "SQUEEGEE". Anyway, what fucking time is it? This COMPUTRER CLOCK is BROKEN! I can't afford, like, master craftsmanship on my INCOME LEVEL.
for real, y'all, think it through. think it through.
was that really what you thought to do today? I'm going to troll squeegee, and this is how u are going to do that?
been on this puzzle box hours now have you?
or is this your quick wit trolling?
its either your best effort or most clever word play
I'm giving you the benefit of the doubt here, its piss isn't it, piss
for real, y'all, think it through. think it through.
was that really what you thought to do today? I'm going to troll squeegee, and this is how u are going to do that?
been on this puzzle box hours now have you?
or is this your quick wit trolling?
its either your best effort or most clever word play
I'm giving you the benefit of the doubt here, its piss isn't it, piss
spectacles triple-posted this 3 years ago, 9 minutes later, 20 hours after the original post[^][v]#1,219,535
@1,219,437 (J)
clock trolling? lol. sold my share in the clock shops in 2019. I will say you're so off base its not even funny. 18 years, a Google search and the ignorant thought that it must be old it must not have business, is just very telling how hard you reach, and how limited you pool of available info. the most expensive small clocks. clocks we sold ran $35,000 dingle berry. you ever heard of wristwatches? well, there are wristwatches wade for walls !
I know! crazy right? you don't wanna know large clock priced tho. thanks for the walk down memory lane tho.
try again boofgender.
Matt ofc