Topic: I was gonna shave my face

Anonymous A started this discussion 3 years ago #108,949

I was gonna shave my face,
But I got high,
My Panasonic Arc 5 is ace,
But I got high,
Now I've opened up my jugular, and I know why,
Because I got high,
Because I got high,
Because I got high.

boof joined in and replied with this 3 years ago, 8 minutes later[^] [v] #1,218,917

but my balls said, hey what about us

Anonymous C joined in and replied with this 3 years ago, 12 hours later, 12 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,218,980

Reported for transphobia/misogyny.

Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 3 years ago, 2 hours later, 14 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,218,985

@1,218,917 (boof)
The pop-up trimmer of the Panasonic Arc 5 was superior.

Anonymous D joined in and replied with this 3 years ago, 1 day later, 2 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,219,101

@previous (A)
Triptych?

Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 3 years ago, 15 minutes later, 2 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,219,103

@previous (D)
The series 9 just doesn’t give you that baby smooth face feeling that the Arc 5 does.

Anonymous D replied with this 3 years ago, 43 minutes later, 2 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,219,105

Let's just pay $20 I tested if $10

Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 3 years ago, 9 hours later, 2 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,219,172

@previous (D)
I really admire good technology. I guess I am a technophile. Keep in mind that, during my lifetime, personal computers came to be. I Was fascinated from the start when I got an Apple IIe as a kid.

Anonymous E joined in and replied with this 3 years ago, 13 hours later, 3 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,219,229

@OPenis is Nopalztling reposting Indy posts.

Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU joined in and replied with this 3 years ago, 37 minutes later, 3 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,219,234

@previous (E)
Normally I'd delete but we need the activity so it stays up.

Anonymous E replied with this 3 years ago, 18 seconds later, 3 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,219,236

@previous (Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU)
He is a fucking psychopath.

Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU replied with this 3 years ago, 9 minutes later, 3 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,219,240

@previous (E)
Obviously he is one of our most mentally unwell posters, but you cannot deny that he does make topics.

Anonymous E replied with this 3 years ago, 9 minutes later, 3 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,219,243

@previous (Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU)
So does Indy, but you keep banning him when he does.

Anonymous E double-posted this 3 years ago, 21 seconds later, 3 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,219,245

@1,219,240 (Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU)
Doesn't he repost Indy posts, then REPORT HIMSELF for reposting Indy posts?

Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU replied with this 3 years ago, 23 minutes later, 3 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,219,251

@1,219,243 (E)
I haven't banned Indy in a while!
@previous (E)
Yes but I do take pity on him because this is his primary source of entertainment. Most people do something of at least moderate value with their lives but not him!

Anonymous E replied with this 3 years ago, 27 minutes later, 3 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,219,252

@previous (Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU)
Meta keeps banning Indy a week at a time for nothing.

Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU replied with this 3 years ago, 2 hours later, 3 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,219,277

@previous (E)
Meta is an enigma. And Indy was probably schtickposting and then denying that it is even possible to know what schtick is, trying to get to the fundamental nature of schtick etc. Not something I'd ban for, and it is futile to try to change Indy's behavior at this point, but meta will meta.

Anonymous E replied with this 3 years ago, 45 minutes later, 3 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,219,281

@previous (Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU)
Meta is a fatass pussy

Anonymous E double-posted this 3 years ago, 23 seconds later, 3 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,219,282

@1,219,277 (Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU)
Note that not a single mod has yet defined shtick for me in five years.

Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 3 years ago, 7 minutes later, 3 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,219,288

@1,219,229 (E)
Nopalztling?

Anonymous A (OP) double-posted this 3 years ago, 5 minutes later, 3 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,219,289

@1,219,236 (E)
Whom do you think I think you are? Go ahead, say it!

Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU replied with this 3 years ago, 29 minutes later, 3 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,219,291

@1,219,282 (E)
You? You mean Indy, whom we are referring to in the third person because he is neither me nor you. Not only have I explicitly done that, but I told you what you would say, and then you said it anyway, which is an almost admirable commitment to never changing who you are as a person.

Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU double-posted this 3 years ago, 1 minute later, 3 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,219,292

@1,219,281 (E)
I have NO IDEA why Meta bans you. Also you were fat for most of your time posting here. I don't get you hating on Meta because of his weight.

Anonymous E replied with this 3 years ago, 1 minute later, 3 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,219,293

@1,219,291 (Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU)
Please just define shtick right here.

Killer Lettuce🌹 !HonkUK.BIE joined in and replied with this 3 years ago, 19 minutes later, 3 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,219,299

@1,219,291 (Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU)
I truly believe that if Ma- I mean Indy lived forever, he would be just the same as he is now. 10,000 years in the future, he would be on another obscure internet forum, doing exactly the same things.

(Edited 22 minutes later.)

Anonymous E replied with this 3 years ago, 23 minutes later, 3 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,219,301

@previous (Killer Lettuce🌹 !HonkUK.BIE)
Define shtick. I dare you.

Anonymous E double-posted this 3 years ago, 52 seconds later, 3 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,219,302

@1,219,292 (Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU)
Funny how you STILL refuse to define shtick.

Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 3 years ago, 5 hours later, 3 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,219,341

@1,219,282 (E)

> Note that not a single mod has yet defined shtick for me in five years.

@1,219,293 (E)

> Please just define shtick right here.

@1,219,301 (E)

> Define shtick. I dare you.

@previous (E)

> Funny how you STILL refuse to define shtick.

lol

Anonymous H joined in and replied with this 3 years ago, 14 hours later, 4 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,219,436

@1,219,229 (E)
Stay on topic.

Anonymous I joined in and replied with this 3 years ago, 7 minutes later, 4 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,219,441

@1,219,251 (Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU)
> Most people do something of at least moderate value with their lives but not him!
Or you.

Anonymous I double-posted this 3 years ago, 1 minute later, 4 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,219,442

@1,219,292 (Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU)

> Also you were fat for most of your time posting here.
> were

Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 3 years ago, 9 hours later, 4 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,219,571

@previous (I)
lol

Anonymous H replied with this 3 years ago, 13 hours later, 5 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,219,606

@1,219,229 (E)
If only you had ignored this topic.

Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 3 years ago, 3 days later, 1 week after the original post[^] [v] #1,219,930

@1,219,245 (E)

> Doesn't he repost Indy posts, then REPORT HIMSELF for reposting Indy posts?

Doesn't he also follow ~~Matt~~ Indy into private Facebook groups, then bribe the group owner into making the group public?

Minichan