Minichan

Topic: so I chanced upon this number lately

boof started this discussion 3 years ago #108,799

The number is 179769313486231580793728971405303415079934132710037826936173778980444968292764750946649017977587207096330286416692887910946555547851940402630657488671505820681908902000708383676273854845817711531764475730270069855571366959622842914819860834936475292719074168444365510704342711559699508093042880177904174497791.
It happens that depending on calculation context, a function might choke on a number just one bigger than that. That is, you may have long integer capability, but a function might only operate on floats, but your setup might have a float size limit or some shit

Anonymous B joined in and replied with this 3 years ago, 8 hours later[^] [v] #1,217,801

It's prime.

boof (OP) replied with this 3 years ago, 3 days later, 3 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,218,302

in binary form, it is 1024 digits long and all ones except for the place value for 2^970

Anonymous B replied with this 3 years ago, 1 minute later, 3 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,218,304

@previous (boof)
Those are primes too. Or should I say two?

boof (OP) replied with this 3 years ago, 8 minutes later, 3 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,218,307

all righty

Anonymous C joined in and replied with this 3 years ago, 17 hours later, 4 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,218,369

Everything is illegal and Americans scream that anyone who is accused of a crime should be executed.

boof (OP) replied with this 3 years ago, 9 hours later, 4 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,218,468

it took a while, but I figured out that the greatest square number less than the number in my post is 179769313486231580793728971405303415079934132710037826936173778980444968292764750946649017977587207096330286416692887910946555547851940402630657488671505793866293043041902956865054254381522306932933655233137338716386646988985411943918023007431745128751145815519073615082284927376759338079856790400834254297089

the square root of that is 13407807929942596727432598158855113001725820008116749133157341386316719597868925090818930617285026583319956944557042494632332259080864313586268726512374783

Anonymous D joined in and replied with this 3 years ago, 48 minutes later, 5 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,218,473

what does this angel number mean

squeegee joined in and replied with this 3 years ago, 19 hours later, 5 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,218,594

jesus suffering christ, it's out of order

Anonymous B replied with this 3 years ago, 2 minutes later, 5 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,218,595

@previous (squeegee)
What would you say if it so turns out that you contributed to Kook & Brie's divorce?

squeegee replied with this 3 years ago, 2 hours later, 5 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,218,610

@previous (B)
i'm sorry, if a relationship, no, a marriage, if a marriage is so easily eroded to the point of breaking apart

i assure you, nothing that hinges so precariously on trolling and turns after 5 minutes using the search feature needed any contributions by me to result in them figuring out between them their wants VS their needs and their participation in a relationship.

I won't lie, the last thing I said was y'all get the fuck off here its a waste of life, nothing of value was lost, the only thing of value was wasted. and then I called everyone a loser. and I told brie and kook to save themselves or save each other. and you're telling me they chose to save themselves.

they're far from the first to do that. Id wish them the best, suggest they focus inward and take an honest look at exclusively their own personal reactions, how the expressed themselves to each other, and find some insight to take away about themselves that will grow them into deeper, more genuine, self reflecting partners in their next adventure.

or be doomed have everyone you like and love just get fucking sick of you or just never offer more than the minimum either. svet.

so, don't fucking blame me because you can't blame them. I don't blame them either. I crossed paths with them, months after I called everyone losers and they are both still attacking everyone with slanders meant for me personally, as recently as 3 weeks ago.

it was unending. thats what their problem was. not ME. just themselves. and they never let any of their problems, resentments, or unmet expectations resolve. I won't blame one or the other for refusing to acknowledge how their behavior doesn't "win," it makes other people give up on you.

frankly, I couldn't hurt their marriage any more than I can help their marriage by calling them winners and encouraging them to troll message boards all day.

shut the fuck up, you obsessed creepy weirdo.

Anonymous B replied with this 3 years ago, 27 minutes later, 5 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,218,611

@previous (squeegee)
> i'm sorry, if a relationship, no, a marriage, if a marriage is so easily eroded to the point of breaking apart
I thought similarly.

I'm not sure what it says if a few half-baked troll posts provokes one to spend months arguing against the shadow of someone who stopped posting here many months prior. Or what it says if said posts may've contributed to the dissolution of a marriage. But it certainly says something.

squeegee replied with this 3 years ago, 19 minutes later, 5 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,218,616

@previous (B)
it says borderline libelous insinuations say things that you're too scared to just say outright. cause it makes u feel like a big boy?

get a divorce, loser. ( see, it doesn't fucking work that way u buncha hermits. )

Anonymous B replied with this 3 years ago, 19 minutes later, 5 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,218,620

@previous (squeegee)
You lost me there.

squeegee replied with this 3 years ago, 8 minutes later, 6 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,218,621

@previous (B)
I'm calling you developmentally stunted and transparent. u follow?

(Edited 48 seconds later.)

Anonymous B replied with this 3 years ago, 5 minutes later, 6 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,218,622

@previous (squeegee)
Huh?

boof (OP) replied with this 3 years ago, 51 minutes later, 6 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,218,628

another fact about the number in post 1
it is somewhere between 170! and 171!
you know, factorial? example 3! = 3 x 2 x 1 = 6

Anonymous B replied with this 3 years ago, 10 minutes later, 6 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,218,632

@previous (boof)
What do you believe is the most uninteresting number?

boof (OP) replied with this 3 years ago, 9 hours later, 6 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,218,676

well Jeepers, maybe some fuckin physics contant

Anonymous B replied with this 3 years ago, 2 minutes later, 6 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,218,677

@previous (boof)
How interesting!
:

Please familiarise yourself with the rules and markup syntax before posting.