Notice: You have been identified as a bot, so no internal UID will be assigned to you. If you are a real person messing with your useragent, you should change it back to something normal.
Anonymous A started this discussion 15 years ago#10,871
a: all stays as it is
b: more serious tone, more crap will be deleted, repetitive reacting images, ruining of good threads, this doesn't mean shit posting or fun is banned
c: needs moar shit posts
Prepare for a smackdown on lame bullshit if the trend goes that way. I rather have 100 posts a day less and some actual interesting discussions. And sure it's a chan, doesn't mean we can't become something on our own, something slightly better. I'm not doing this for myself, I'm doing this for the users who like the board, post good shit, and get their threads ruined by fucktards.
I'm all for a crack down on that kind of derailment/lameness. If we need new/more mods so be it. This --shyte-- site is user generated.
(Edited 11 minutes later.)
Homestar !RUNNERV7vk replied with this 15 years ago, 4 minutes later, 13 hours after the original post[^][v]#194,302
@previous (A) > I rather have 100 posts a day less and some actual interesting discussions.
Why does the existence of shit posts prevent you from starting more serious discussions?
SQUARED :3 !L.....AlN. replied with this 15 years ago, 6 minutes later, 13 hours after the original post[^][v]#194,303
> Why does the existence of shit posts prevent you from starting more serious discussions?
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 15 years ago, 2 minutes later, 13 hours after the original post[^][v]#194,304
@194,302 (Homestar !RUNNERV7vk)
It won't if they are confined to their own threads. If you like the person above to ruin your attempts of a nice thread with guys cumming on their faces fine. Most of us don't want that. I rather get rid of those people if all they 'contribute' are dumb reaction images. /b/ is that way ->
Homestar !RUNNERV7vk replied with this 15 years ago, 25 minutes later, 13 hours after the original post[^][v]#194,310
@previous (A)
Hmm, maybe it could be an option to let OPs moderate their own threads. Lot's of room for abuse, though...
Anonymous G replied with this 15 years ago, 2 minutes later, 13 hours after the original post[^][v]#194,311
@previous (Homestar !RUNNERV7vk)
Not a good road to go down, in my opinion. It will definitely get abused at some point or another, and could potentially ruin/incite drama in a thread that could have otherwise been good.
Homestar !RUNNERV7vk replied with this 15 years ago, 1 minute later, 13 hours after the original post[^][v]#194,312
@previous (G)
How about an optional "serious" checkbox when starting a thread, so that mods know to clean up shit from these threads, but not others so much?
Anonymous G replied with this 15 years ago, 3 minutes later, 13 hours after the original post[^][v]#194,313
@previous (Homestar !RUNNERV7vk)
Again, could be abused. Besides, I don't think you need a checkbox to distinguish between serious threads and not so serious threads.
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 15 years ago, 1 minute later, 13 hours after the original post[^][v]#194,314
@194,310 (Homestar !RUNNERV7vk)
I'd be more inclined to manually add more minimods given they have a good posting history and aren't complete fucktards and on the same page as the rest of the people who'd like this site thrive rather than serve as shitbox only. A minimod can only delete posts, he/she can not edit/profile view/ban/etc.
Homestar !RUNNERV7vk replied with this 15 years ago, 4 minutes later, 13 hours after the original post[^][v]#194,318
@previous (A)
Doesn't sound too bad, but my concern is over-zealous minimods that delete posts just because they don't agree or like the subject matter.
That was the reason for my rage-quit earlier, though mods seem to be good now.
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 15 years ago, 17 minutes later, 14 hours after the original post[^][v]#194,333
@previous (Homestar !RUNNERV7vk)
Well, any post can be undeleted. And any minimod can be removed if they abuse their "power" besides I wouldn't give it to idiots. Have a little faith it me.
Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU joined in and replied with this 15 years ago, 2 hours later, 16 hours after the original post[^][v]#194,386
@previous (A)
inb4 toaster and carebear are made admins and fuck the site permanently.
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 15 years ago, 1 minute later, 16 hours after the original post[^][v]#194,387
@previous (Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU) > Implying they aren't doing that already. Fucking the site I mean.
(Edited 12 seconds later.)
Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU replied with this 15 years ago, 3 minutes later, 16 hours after the original post[^][v]#194,389
@previous (A)
Well that's not so bad. I'd rather have toaster fucking the site than fucking little boys, and carebear fucks everything and everyone she sees, so that's not surprising either.
henn joined in and replied with this 15 years ago, 1 hour later, 17 hours after the original post[^][v]#194,420
LET'S RUN THIS SHITHOLE INTO THE GROUND!
Anonymous T joined in and replied with this 15 years ago, 20 minutes later, 18 hours after the original post[^][v]#194,449
CLear all the bans and give those who have been exiled a second chance.
Anonymous U joined in and replied with this 15 years ago, 5 minutes later, 18 hours after the original post[^][v]#194,450
@previous (T)
You have your own board though, Matt.
Anonymous F replied with this 15 years ago, 23 seconds later, 18 hours after the original post[^][v]#194,451
Why don't we mark serious threads where OP wants serious discussion as [TROLL FREE]? that way everyone knows when it's not cool to kid around.
Also, some of these thread contain pornography and sexually suggestive discusssions and adult content which may be innappropriate for minors. Can we have people start marking their headlines as [18+] or [NSFW]?
Also, foreign language discussions should be labled in the headline as being an alt language thread. E.g. [FRENCH]
henn replied with this 15 years ago, 5 minutes later, 18 hours after the original post[^][v]#194,454
Anonymous F replied with this 15 years ago, 5 minutes later, 18 hours after the original post[^][v]#194,455
@previous (henn)
Go swim in a pool. Oh, wait. Nvm.
Anonymous U replied with this 15 years ago, 21 minutes later, 18 hours after the original post[^][v]#194,470
@194,304 (A) > If you like the person above to ruin your attempts of a nice thread with guys cumming on their faces fine. Most of us don't want that. I rather get rid of those people if all they 'contribute' are dumb reaction images.
I swear I remember this exact same thread from a few months ago, right around the time ATBBS.org was created. That one mustn't of worked as planned, I see.
The Pony !.PonyTzEbE joined in and replied with this 15 years ago, 9 minutes later, 19 hours after the original post[^][v]#194,480
> Why don't we mark serious threads where OP wants serious discussion as [TROLL FREE]? that way everyone knows when it's not cool to kid around.
We used to have that. We'd write (Serious thread) on the end of the topics and any replies that weren't helpful or serious were deleted by the mods. Do we not do that any more?
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 15 years ago, 2 hours later, 21 hours after the original post[^][v]#194,526
@previous (The Pony !.PonyTzEbE)
Yeah, why not? Just give mods time to clean up before starting to rape the report system.
The Pony !.PonyTzEbE replied with this 15 years ago, 3 minutes later, 21 hours after the original post[^][v]#194,529
Back in the day we didn't even have a report system. We had to wait for Nickalollyoff to stop telling people to "Reverse the polarity" long enough to delete something.
Lawrence !9p5vCatBBQ joined in and replied with this 15 years ago, 1 hour later, 23 hours after the original post[^][v]#194,593
lol @194,304 (A) > It won't if they are confined to their own threads. If you like the person above to ruin your attempts of a nice thread with guys cumming on their faces fine. > implying that even happens @194,301 (A) > Prepare for a smackdown on lame bullshit if the trend goes that way.
lol
Killer Lettuce !!iNo3FkiZx replied with this 15 years ago, 24 minutes later, 23 hours after the original post[^][v]#194,604
> Starting today, when I'm around I will moderate more strictly on crap inside "good" topics. I urge the mods to do the same. Good is subjective, ask me or someone in the staff channel on IRC if you're confused my dead mods. > dead mods
:o
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 15 years ago, 23 minutes later, 23 hours after the original post[^][v]#194,625
[11:13pm] <sim> together we make this work
[11:13pm] <sim> and form it
[11:14pm] <sim> together we can also ruin it
The Pony !.PonyTzEbE replied with this 15 years ago, 6 minutes later, 23 hours after the original post[^][v]#194,629
The users (we) contribute the content, we can merely try to direct it into a direction that makes more people happy and allows for a more thriving board.
(Edited 2 minutes later.)
The Pony !.PonyTzEbE replied with this 15 years ago, 15 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^][v]#194,650
Anonymous Z-1 joined in and replied with this 15 years ago, 56 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^][v]#194,671
Maybe it's time to try having a separate serious board again now that AT is gone for good.
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 15 years ago, 5 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^][v]#194,673
@previous (Z-1)
Why not have both?
Keep the faggotry out of nice threads, self moderate. Everybody likes to troll and be a shit poster. Just do it in the right topics and dont cry if the mods delete your shit sometimes.
Anonymous Z-1 replied with this 15 years ago, 7 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^][v]#194,676
@previous (A) > Why not have both? Keep the faggotry out of nice threads, self moderate.
That will be swell if we can all keep to that.
Anonymous U replied with this 15 years ago, 2 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^][v]#194,678
> Why don't we mark serious threads where OP wants serious discussion as [TROLL FREE]? that way everyone knows when it's not cool to kid around. > > Also, some of these thread contain pornography and sexually suggestive discusssions and adult content which may be innappropriate for minors. Can we have people start marking their headlines as [18+] or [NSFW]? > > Also, foreign language discussions should be labled in the headline as being an alt language thread. E.g. [FRENCH]
If you do that, you turn the place into AT with useless features and mini-features and stupid little rules and procedures that eventually turn the whole place into an inaccessible clusterfuck where the only people posting will be Psychopath talking about why niggers are bad and me calling him a fat pedophile.
Anonymous F replied with this 15 years ago, 11 minutes later, 2 days after the original post[^][v]#195,868
@previous (Nickalollyoff !Aw0s40dyqw)
Damn, you saw right through me :3
The Pony !.PonyTzEbE replied with this 15 years ago, 5 minutes later, 2 days after the original post[^][v]#195,874
Voice of !WisdomHsuU joined in and replied with this 15 years ago, 3 hours later, 3 days after the original post[^][v]#196,086
@previous (The Pony !.PonyTzEbE)
That wouldn't happen under choice B.
In short, only the utmost cancerous of imbeciles or the most heartless of trolls would ever THINK to vote for A.
Voice of !WisdomHsuU double-posted this 15 years ago, 2 minutes later, 3 days after the original post[^][v]#196,090
@195,849 (Nickalollyoff !Aw0s40dyqw)
Why do you want MC to remain a duplicate TC? I think MC would be great under rules that are similar to AT. In fact, the only bad part about AT was the rampant pedophilia, because it was a fantastic board otherwise. Besides, the removal of shitposting on MC may give TC a much-needed boost in traffic.
(Edited 39 seconds later.)
Broseph !!fxnDb+Ve4 joined in and replied with this 15 years ago, 1 hour later, 3 days after the original post[^][v]#196,166
@previous (Voice of !WisdomHsuU)
The rampant pedophilia, the ridiculously strict rules, the mentally ill admin, the forced anon, and lots of other things.
Voice of !WisdomHsuU replied with this 15 years ago, 54 seconds later, 3 days after the original post[^][v]#196,167
@previous (Broseph !!fxnDb+Ve4) > forced anon
Shoot... I almost forgot about that part. The rest of that would be fine, if not for the pedophilia and the forced anon.
(Edited 39 seconds later.)
swamplights !!V3J448+/B joined in and replied with this 15 years ago, 8 minutes later, 3 days after the original post[^][v]#196,179
@previous (Voice of !WisdomHsuU)
That site was interesting because of how many sexual issues plagued it's user base.
Anonymous Z-7 joined in and replied with this 15 years ago, 40 minutes later, 3 days after the original post[^][v]#196,249
That way ->
swamplights !!V3J448+/B replied with this 15 years ago, 1 minute later, 3 days after the original post[^][v]#196,251