Meta !Sober//iZs joined in and replied with this 3 years ago, 2 hours later, 14 hours after the original post[^][v]#1,213,850
@1,213,819 (A)
Someone tried to build a company and solicit donations to hunt ghosts, which aren't real and can't be "hunted". Does that sound sane to you?
I'm not trying to be a smartass here either I'm just saying some things are subjective and you may or may not agree with someone's spirituality. And that's fine!
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 3 years ago, 17 minutes later, 14 hours after the original post[^][v]#1,213,854
@previous (Meta !Sober//iZs)
There is SOME evidence for ghosts. Throughout history, people have claimed to see them. There is NO evidence for a demonic portal over the White House. One person "saw" it. Now, if millions of people had seen a demonic portal over the White House since the dawn of history, then yes, it would be more reasonable.
Killer Lettuce🌹 !HonkUK.BIE replied with this 3 years ago, 21 minutes later, 14 hours after the original post[^][v]#1,213,860
@1,213,790 (Killer Lettuce🌹 !HonkUK.BIE)
You knoe, next time the LNB comes back I think I'll let it run for a bit before I ban it. It comes out with some very chucklesome stuff. The guy who wrote it must be pretty nuts.
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 3 years ago, 6 minutes later, 15 hours after the original post[^][v]#1,213,870
@previous (Meta !Sober//iZs)
They all have some evidence, and are not literally impossible. But let's get to the bigger point: why are you defending a man's claim that he saw a demonic portal open over the Biden White House? Why are you siding with him?
Now this claim of a demonic portal, are you sure Roger Stone himself is on record saying that, or is this attributed to someone else who is NOT Roger Stone?