Topic: I’m leaving
Anonymous A started this discussion 3 years ago #108,124
But baby, it’s cold outside.
Anonymous B joined in and replied with this 3 years ago, 2 hours later[^] [v] #1,213,130
That's a rape culture song, and you should feel bad.
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 3 years ago, 5 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,213,134
Anonymous B replied with this 3 years ago, 43 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,213,146
@previous (A)
She was being second guessed, and verbally harassed. He was coercing her to stay, letting his victim know what he wanted, and ignoring that she repeatedly expressed a desire to leave.
If a woman says "no" that's not your invitation to convince her to say yes.
The song doesn't clarify if he managed to keep her in the house, but he's not letting her leave. An attempted rape, even if she bolts out the door before he can grab her wrist, is still a crime.
If there were any semblance of justice in the world the police would have raided Frank Loesser's home and questioned those around him to find out how many sexual assaults he'd committed.
The very fact none of that happened is why we need vigilantes like The Kook to serve as a check on these disgusting rapists.
Try listening to the song again, but imagine yourself as a woman, you sick piece of shit.
She was being second guessed, and verbally harassed. He was coercing her to stay, letting his victim know what he wanted, and ignoring that she repeatedly expressed a desire to leave.
If a woman says "no" that's not your invitation to convince her to say yes.
The song doesn't clarify if he managed to keep her in the house, but he's not letting her leave. An attempted rape, even if she bolts out the door before he can grab her wrist, is still a crime.
If there were any semblance of justice in the world the police would have raided Frank Loesser's home and questioned those around him to find out how many sexual assaults he'd committed.
The very fact none of that happened is why we need vigilantes like The Kook to serve as a check on these disgusting rapists.
Try listening to the song again, but imagine yourself as a woman, you sick piece of shit.
Kook !!rcSrAtaAC joined in and replied with this 3 years ago, 47 minutes later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,213,151
Anonymous B replied with this 3 years ago, 1 hour later, 5 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,213,162
Anonymous D joined in and replied with this 3 years ago, 5 minutes later, 5 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,213,164
Kook !!rcSrAtaAC replied with this 3 years ago, 5 minutes later, 5 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,213,166
Anonymous B replied with this 3 years ago, 1 minute later, 5 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,213,167
@previous (Kook !!rcSrAtaAC)
Loesser was jewish so I guess you'll give him a pass just how Hillary helped Weinstein hold down all those women.
Loesser was jewish so I guess you'll give him a pass just how Hillary helped Weinstein hold down all those women.
Anonymous D replied with this 3 years ago, 1 minute later, 5 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,213,168
Anonymous B replied with this 3 years ago, 17 seconds later, 5 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,213,169
kook and frank loesserKook !!rcSrAtaAC replied with this 3 years ago, 1 minute later, 5 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,213,171
Anonymous B replied with this 3 years ago, 42 seconds later, 5 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,213,172
@previous (Kook !!rcSrAtaAC)
> Because I've seen the movie and I can understand context clues
> the movie
what
> Because I've seen the movie and I can understand context clues
> the movie
what
Anonymous D replied with this 3 years ago, 1 minute later, 5 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,213,173
sharing a milkshake at the soda shop meant that the woman was going to be RAPED! You can't disprove it, because THE JEWS!!! Anonymous B is complicit in the conspiracy! Jew media is rape! All culture pre 1980 is rape culture!
Kook !!rcSrAtaAC replied with this 3 years ago, 22 seconds later, 5 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,213,174
Anonymous D replied with this 3 years ago, 1 minute later, 5 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,213,175
anon B went full retard
Anonymous B replied with this 3 years ago, 1 minute later, 5 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,213,177
@1,213,173 (D)
Sharing a milkshake is not rape, unless you repeatedly deny your date the option to leave and tell them they need to stay.
@1,213,174 (Kook !!rcSrAtaAC)
These are the lyrics from an old song, that was around before whatever movie you are referring to.
Sharing a milkshake is not rape, unless you repeatedly deny your date the option to leave and tell them they need to stay.
@1,213,174 (Kook !!rcSrAtaAC)
These are the lyrics from an old song, that was around before whatever movie you are referring to.
Anonymous B double-posted this 3 years ago, 52 seconds later, 5 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,213,178
@1,213,175 (D)
Telling a woman she can't leave, in a sexual context, is not the same thing as buying her a dairy beverage.
Telling a woman she can't leave, in a sexual context, is not the same thing as buying her a dairy beverage.
Anonymous D replied with this 3 years ago, 1 minute later, 5 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,213,179
@1,213,177 (B)
their DNA is the on the straw, they CANNOT LEAVE! the JEWS win again, Epstein ISLAND milkshake STRAW! Bill Clinton! JEWS!!!!! RApe CuLtURe!!
their DNA is the on the straw, they CANNOT LEAVE! the JEWS win again, Epstein ISLAND milkshake STRAW! Bill Clinton! JEWS!!!!! RApe CuLtURe!!
Anonymous B replied with this 3 years ago, 1 minute later, 5 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,213,180
Kook !!rcSrAtaAC replied with this 3 years ago, 17 seconds later, 5 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,213,181
@1,213,177 (B)
It was written in 1944 and released in 1949 in a movie
It's a flirtatious song where the woman doesn't actually want to leave
In the same movie, a second version of a song plays where a woman is the aggressor
Also you sound retarded
It was written in 1944 and released in 1949 in a movie
It's a flirtatious song where the woman doesn't actually want to leave
In the same movie, a second version of a song plays where a woman is the aggressor
Also you sound retarded
(Edited 13 seconds later.)
Anonymous D replied with this 3 years ago, 21 seconds later, 5 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,213,182
Kook !!rcSrAtaAC replied with this 3 years ago, 3 minutes later, 5 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,213,183
Anon B, how did you know who wrote this song, but not about the movie that featured it?
(Edited 12 seconds later.)
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 3 years ago, 31 seconds later, 5 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,213,184
Anonymous B replied with this 3 years ago, 2 minutes later, 5 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,213,186
@1,213,181 (Kook !!rcSrAtaAC)
> It's a flirtatious song where the woman doesn't actually want to leave
This is exactly how rapists explain circumstances. "She said no, but she meant yes".
> In the same movie, a second version of a song plays where a woman is the aggressor
And that gets you off?
> It's a flirtatious song where the woman doesn't actually want to leave
This is exactly how rapists explain circumstances. "She said no, but she meant yes".
> In the same movie, a second version of a song plays where a woman is the aggressor
And that gets you off?
Anonymous B double-posted this 3 years ago, 36 seconds later, 5 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,213,187
Anonymous B triple-posted this 3 years ago, 1 minute later, 5 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,213,188
@1,213,184 (A)
Many different ways, as long as she's free to leave, and you accept her comment to depart then everything's fine.
If you're coercing a woman to stay after she's expressed a desire to leave, you're veering close to rapistry.
Many different ways, as long as she's free to leave, and you accept her comment to depart then everything's fine.
If you're coercing a woman to stay after she's expressed a desire to leave, you're veering close to rapistry.
Kook !!rcSrAtaAC replied with this 3 years ago, 7 minutes later, 5 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,213,193
@1,213,187 (B)
The Canon is that he wrote this song as a duet between him and his wife to sing to party goers as they would leave
Then a company bought it and put it in a movie
It's not about rape and never has been about rape
The Canon is that he wrote this song as a duet between him and his wife to sing to party goers as they would leave
Then a company bought it and put it in a movie
It's not about rape and never has been about rape
Anonymous D replied with this 3 years ago, 12 seconds later, 5 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,213,194
Kook !!rcSrAtaAC replied with this 3 years ago, 34 seconds later, 5 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,213,195
Anonymous D replied with this 3 years ago, 19 seconds later, 5 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,213,196
Kook !!rcSrAtaAC replied with this 3 years ago, 26 seconds later, 5 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,213,197
Anonymous B replied with this 3 years ago, 31 seconds later, 5 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,213,198
Kook !!rcSrAtaAC replied with this 3 years ago, 37 seconds later, 5 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,213,199
Kook !!rcSrAtaAC double-posted this 3 years ago, 37 seconds later, 5 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,213,200
How can a song be canon?
Anonymous B replied with this 3 years ago, 54 seconds later, 5 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,213,201
@1,213,194 (D)
@1,213,195 (Kook !!rcSrAtaAC)
@1,213,196 (D)
@1,213,197 (Kook !!rcSrAtaAC)
rent free.
@1,213,195 (Kook !!rcSrAtaAC)
@1,213,196 (D)
@1,213,197 (Kook !!rcSrAtaAC)
rent free.
Anonymous B double-posted this 3 years ago, 56 seconds later, 5 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,213,202
@1,213,200 (Kook !!rcSrAtaAC)
The song has a story, and that story is not changed whenever someone puts the song in their movie.
The song has a story, and that story is not changed whenever someone puts the song in their movie.
Anonymous B triple-posted this 3 years ago, 17 seconds later, 5 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,213,203
Kook !!rcSrAtaAC replied with this 3 years ago, 4 seconds later, 5 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,213,204
@1,213,201 (B)
Only Catherine would be retarded enough to type that Canon bullshit
Only Catherine would be retarded enough to type that Canon bullshit
(Edited 8 seconds later.)
chester joined in and replied with this 3 years ago, 10 seconds later, 5 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,213,205
Anonymous B replied with this 3 years ago, 1 minute later, 5 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,213,207
@1,213,204 (Kook !!rcSrAtaAC)
Do you have this person's phone number? If so call them, ask them right now if they even visit this site anymore.
Do you have this person's phone number? If so call them, ask them right now if they even visit this site anymore.
Anonymous D replied with this 3 years ago, 52 seconds later, 5 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,213,208
Anonymous B replied with this 3 years ago, 4 seconds later, 5 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,213,209
@1,213,205 (chester)
Yes, there are many movies inspired by music and that's an independent artistic decisions that doesn't change the meaning of the original work, correct.
Yes, there are many movies inspired by music and that's an independent artistic decisions that doesn't change the meaning of the original work, correct.
Anonymous D replied with this 3 years ago, 21 seconds later, 5 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,213,210
Kook !!rcSrAtaAC replied with this 3 years ago, 10 seconds later, 5 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,213,211
Kook !!rcSrAtaAC double-posted this 3 years ago, 47 seconds later, 5 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,213,212
Anonymous B replied with this 3 years ago, 4 seconds later, 5 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,213,213
Anonymous D replied with this 3 years ago, 19 seconds later, 5 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,213,214
Anonymous B replied with this 3 years ago, 27 seconds later, 5 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,213,215
@1,213,211 (Kook !!rcSrAtaAC)
If you want to dox an old friend because you can't help but start arguments, that's none of my business.
If you want to dox an old friend because you can't help but start arguments, that's none of my business.
Kook !!rcSrAtaAC replied with this 3 years ago, 32 seconds later, 5 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,213,217
Anonymous D replied with this 3 years ago, 21 seconds later, 5 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,213,218
Anonymous B replied with this 3 years ago, 18 seconds later, 5 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,213,219
@1,213,212 (Kook !!rcSrAtaAC)
Most "wives" in the world had no choice in the matter.
How much choice did she have when a rich jew with connections in the entertainment industry told her she had to stay?
Most "wives" in the world had no choice in the matter.
How much choice did she have when a rich jew with connections in the entertainment industry told her she had to stay?
Anonymous B double-posted this 3 years ago, 16 seconds later, 5 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,213,220
Anonymous D replied with this 3 years ago, 14 seconds later, 6 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,213,221
Anonymous D double-posted this 3 years ago, 17 seconds later, 6 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,213,222
Anonymous B replied with this 3 years ago, 25 seconds later, 6 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,213,223
@1,213,221 (D)
> Slavery isn't real because I heard about this guy that fled to the north after 20 years of forced labor.
> Slavery isn't real because I heard about this guy that fled to the north after 20 years of forced labor.
Anonymous B double-posted this 3 years ago, 18 seconds later, 6 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,213,224
Anonymous D replied with this 3 years ago, 28 seconds later, 6 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,213,225
Hot chocolate and fireplaces are rape culture.
Anonymous D double-posted this 3 years ago, 59 seconds later, 6 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,213,226
get laid Catherine
Kook !!rcSrAtaAC replied with this 3 years ago, 17 seconds later, 6 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,213,227
Kook !!rcSrAtaAC double-posted this 3 years ago, 33 seconds later, 6 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,213,228
Anonymous B replied with this 3 years ago, 49 seconds later, 6 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,213,229
@1,213,225 (D)
If you chained someone up or held them at gunpoint in a cozy living room, it would be wrong.
For a woman, a larger man always has the power to kill with his body alone. Refusing to respect her decision is a violent act, at the very least he is implying violence.
Women play along out of fear, not consent.
If you chained someone up or held them at gunpoint in a cozy living room, it would be wrong.
For a woman, a larger man always has the power to kill with his body alone. Refusing to respect her decision is a violent act, at the very least he is implying violence.
Women play along out of fear, not consent.
Anonymous B double-posted this 3 years ago, 23 seconds later, 6 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,213,230
@1,213,228 (Kook !!rcSrAtaAC)
And slaves could escape, so I guess there was no coercion there either.
And slaves could escape, so I guess there was no coercion there either.
Kook !!rcSrAtaAC replied with this 3 years ago, 3 minutes later, 6 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,213,232
chester replied with this 3 years ago, 1 minute later, 6 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,213,233
Anonymous F joined in and replied with this 3 years ago, 1 minute later, 6 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,213,235
Anonymous B replied with this 3 years ago, 26 seconds later, 6 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,213,236
@1,213,233 (chester)
I'm the only one here saying this is bad, the others are insisting that being coerced by a man to stay where he wants you is normal romantic behavior.
I'm the only one here saying this is bad, the others are insisting that being coerced by a man to stay where he wants you is normal romantic behavior.
chester replied with this 3 years ago, 1 minute later, 6 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,213,237
Kook !!rcSrAtaAC replied with this 3 years ago, 6 seconds later, 6 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,213,238
@1,213,233 (chester)
Because she knew the name and ethnicity of the author but nothing of the movie, I'm guessing her retarded right wing brother told her this info or showed her a meme
Because she knew the name and ethnicity of the author but nothing of the movie, I'm guessing her retarded right wing brother told her this info or showed her a meme
(Edited 35 seconds later.)
Anonymous B replied with this 3 years ago, 4 seconds later, 6 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,213,239
@1,213,235 (F)
Harriet Tubman left slavery, so it must have been consensual!
This is the exact reasoning used to defend a rapist jew with media connections.
Harriet Tubman left slavery, so it must have been consensual!
This is the exact reasoning used to defend a rapist jew with media connections.
(Edited 2 minutes later.)
Anonymous B double-posted this 3 years ago, 27 seconds later, 6 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,213,240
@1,213,237 (chester)
It's not deep, she wants to leave, he denies her request. As cut and dry as it comes.
It's not deep, she wants to leave, he denies her request. As cut and dry as it comes.
chester replied with this 3 years ago, 26 seconds later, 6 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,213,241
Anonymous B replied with this 3 years ago, 1 minute later, 6 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,213,242
@1,213,238 (Kook !!rcSrAtaAC)
It's the right wing trying to make sure women can say "no" and leave uncomfortable situations then, you agree.
One more question, is she/her the current preferred pronouns of this person you are obsessed with? Or are you applying old pronouns to someone who does not wish to use those?
It's the right wing trying to make sure women can say "no" and leave uncomfortable situations then, you agree.
One more question, is she/her the current preferred pronouns of this person you are obsessed with? Or are you applying old pronouns to someone who does not wish to use those?
Anonymous B double-posted this 3 years ago, 42 seconds later, 6 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,213,243
@1,213,241 (chester)
Good to know, I'll do whatever crime I want and wear a menorah so no one can criticize me.
Good to know, I'll do whatever crime I want and wear a menorah so no one can criticize me.
Kook !!rcSrAtaAC replied with this 3 years ago, 37 seconds later, 6 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,213,244
Anonymous D replied with this 3 years ago, 6 seconds later, 6 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,213,245
@1,213,239 (B)
Weinstein, Epstein, Clinton and gates, too! Rape culture! Rape culture! Now you are The Jew
Weinstein, Epstein, Clinton and gates, too! Rape culture! Rape culture! Now you are The Jew
Anonymous B replied with this 3 years ago, 24 seconds later, 6 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,213,246
@1,213,244 (Kook !!rcSrAtaAC)
This person you are obsessed with. Does "she" use she/her pronouns? Because that's what you just used.
This person you are obsessed with. Does "she" use she/her pronouns? Because that's what you just used.
Anonymous B double-posted this 3 years ago, 45 seconds later, 6 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,213,247
@1,213,245 (D)
When you start ranting about jews, it means I don't have to respond to any of your points anymore and I automatically win.
Someone told me that.
When you start ranting about jews, it means I don't have to respond to any of your points anymore and I automatically win.
Someone told me that.
Anonymous D replied with this 3 years ago, 1 minute later, 6 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,213,248
@1,213,242 (B)
How the fuck should we know? You posting "cryptically" in the third person is not an update about your identity. Good luck getting the state of california on your side with this nothingburger. Go rant about the jews some more
How the fuck should we know? You posting "cryptically" in the third person is not an update about your identity. Good luck getting the state of california on your side with this nothingburger. Go rant about the jews some more
Kook !!rcSrAtaAC replied with this 3 years ago, 14 seconds later, 6 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,213,249
Anonymous D replied with this 3 years ago, 1 minute later, 6 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,213,250
Anonymous B replied with this 3 years ago, 49 seconds later, 6 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,213,251
chester replied with this 3 years ago, 13 seconds later, 6 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,213,252
@1,213,246 (B)
> This person you are obsessed with. Does "she" use she/her pronouns? Because that's what you just used.
yeah Catherine is a girls name even if you are just an autistic fat dude now but we have no way of knowing that
> This person you are obsessed with. Does "she" use she/her pronouns? Because that's what you just used.
yeah Catherine is a girls name even if you are just an autistic fat dude now but we have no way of knowing that
chester double-posted this 3 years ago, 12 seconds later, 6 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,213,253
Anonymous D replied with this 3 years ago, 9 seconds later, 6 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,213,254
Kook !!rcSrAtaAC replied with this 3 years ago, 49 seconds later, 6 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,213,256
Anonymous F replied with this 3 years ago, 3 minutes later, 6 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,213,257
@1,213,251 (B)
> You're a lying bitch faking a bad memory. good night.
Dude, calm down man! I say this to you man to man, grow a pair!
> You're a lying bitch faking a bad memory. good night.
Dude, calm down man! I say this to you man to man, grow a pair!
Kook !!rcSrAtaAC replied with this 3 years ago, 4 minutes later, 6 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,213,258
How are we supposed to know anyone's new pronouns if they don't tell us?