Topic: Attn gay men
Anonymous A started this discussion 15 years ago #10,798
Have you ever trolled straight men to take pictures for you by pretending to be a female?
I'm not gay, but I have a troll female facebook account and from all the messages I get it seems like this would be too easy
I'm not gay, but I have a troll female facebook account and from all the messages I get it seems like this would be too easy
Anonymous B joined in and replied with this 15 years ago, 1 minute later[^] [v] #192,503
sup to4str?Anonymous C joined in and replied with this 15 years ago, 1 minute later, 2 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #192,504
so is this your new vice, to4str?
ltamake !!onnLC5KY8 joined in and replied with this 15 years ago, 6 minutes later, 9 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #192,505
sup to4str
jump? joined in and replied with this 15 years ago, 4 minutes later, 14 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #192,506
Why would you? There are literally billions of nude gay dude images on the Internet to choose from.
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 15 years ago, 12 minutes later, 27 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #192,507
jump? replied with this 15 years ago, 11 minutes later, 38 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #192,511
@previous (A)
> SUP On March 4, 2009 blogTV released the junior channel type. This is for users aged between 13 and 15 years of age. …
Why am I always the last to find out about these things. That makes sense. It's illegal to get to old content, so you need original content for that age range, if you are the kind of sicko who goes for grannies, that is.
> SUP On March 4, 2009 blogTV released the junior channel type. This is for users aged between 13 and 15 years of age. …
Why am I always the last to find out about these things. That makes sense. It's illegal to get to old content, so you need original content for that age range, if you are the kind of sicko who goes for grannies, that is.
(Edited 19 seconds later.)
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 15 years ago, 9 minutes later, 48 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #192,513
jump? replied with this 15 years ago, 1 hour later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #192,547
@previous (A)
I only did a few times to troll and was almost always instantlybanned shitlisted.
I only did a few times to troll and was almost always instantly
(Edited 32 seconds later.)
Homestar !RUNNERV7vk joined in and replied with this 15 years ago, 5 hours later, 7 hours after the original post[^] [v] #192,627
@192,506 (jump?)
Straight guys are hotter.
@OP
I IRCed with straight guys a few times as a girl. :3 Not for years, though.
Straight guys are hotter.
@OP
I IRCed with straight guys a few times as a girl. :3 Not for years, though.
Anonymous H joined in and replied with this 15 years ago, 1 hour later, 9 hours after the original post[^] [v] #192,651
@previous (Homestar !RUNNERV7vk)
You're awful.
Mostly for using the :3 face, but as well for being so creepy...
You're awful.
Mostly for using the :3 face, but as well for being so creepy...
Homestar !RUNNERV7vk replied with this 15 years ago, 23 minutes later, 9 hours after the original post[^] [v] #192,668
Anonymous H replied with this 15 years ago, 5 minutes later, 9 hours after the original post[^] [v] #192,677
Homestar !RUNNERV7vk replied with this 15 years ago, 1 minute later, 9 hours after the original post[^] [v] #192,680
@previous (H)
bonehead 301 up, 76 down
What traditional non-racist skinheads began to call scruffy glue-sniffing sleazeballs who pretended to be skinheads in the late 1970s. Now it specifically refers to neo-Nazi/white power skinhead imposters.
bonehead 301 up, 76 down
What traditional non-racist skinheads began to call scruffy glue-sniffing sleazeballs who pretended to be skinheads in the late 1970s. Now it specifically refers to neo-Nazi/white power skinhead imposters.
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 15 years ago, 2 hours later, 12 hours after the original post[^] [v] #192,742
(Citing a deleted or non-existent reply.)
> t you can never really get the right age range of men/teens/boys you want
Why's that? Seems like you could choose the exact range you want by choosing the age-range of the pictures of the female you pretend to be. And with facebook you also control it with your friends list which further gives you the appearance of being a certain age.
> t you can never really get the right age range of men/teens/boys you want
Why's that? Seems like you could choose the exact range you want by choosing the age-range of the pictures of the female you pretend to be. And with facebook you also control it with your friends list which further gives you the appearance of being a certain age.
protip !!pMmAiEwOm joined in and replied with this 15 years ago, 1 hour later, 14 hours after the original post[^] [v] #192,823
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 15 years ago, 1 hour later, 15 hours after the original post[^] [v] #192,873
(Citing a deleted or non-existent reply.)
Do your research ahead of time. Ideally you'd want to find a girl who you have both nude and non-nude pictures of, to better lure them.
Do your research ahead of time. Ideally you'd want to find a girl who you have both nude and non-nude pictures of, to better lure them.
Anonymous J joined in and replied with this 15 years ago, 15 minutes later, 15 hours after the original post[^] [v] #192,884
@192,668 (Homestar !RUNNERV7vk)
> Why can't I use the :3 face? :-(
Only the British can use the :3 face. :')
> Why can't I use the :3 face? :-(
Only the British can use the :3 face. :')
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 15 years ago, 3 minutes later, 15 hours after the original post[^] [v] #192,887
(Citing a deleted or non-existent reply.)
Yeah, it's questionable if you'll ever get an 8 year old willing to do that.
But 13 year olds I think it's going to be easier than you imagine. Send a few flirty messages and then send more and more provocative images. Then send a censored version of a nude picture and tell him that you are not sure to send it...that he has to prove he's interested. It would almost be too easy.
Yeah, it's questionable if you'll ever get an 8 year old willing to do that.
But 13 year olds I think it's going to be easier than you imagine. Send a few flirty messages and then send more and more provocative images. Then send a censored version of a nude picture and tell him that you are not sure to send it...that he has to prove he's interested. It would almost be too easy.
(Edited 1 minute later.)
Anonymous K joined in and replied with this 15 years ago, 4 minutes later, 15 hours after the original post[^] [v] #192,888
Anonymous L joined in and replied with this 15 years ago, 3 minutes later, 15 hours after the original post[^] [v] #192,893
protip !!pMmAiEwOm joined in and replied with this 15 years ago, 5 hours later, 21 hours after the original post[^] [v] #193,232
So, this is now a "how to groom children for my own sexual pleasure" thread?
Whoa.
Whoa.
(Edited 49 seconds later.)
Anonymous C replied with this 15 years ago, 6 minutes later, 21 hours after the original post[^] [v] #193,244
Anonymous B replied with this 15 years ago, 2 minutes later, 21 hours after the original post[^] [v] #193,249
@193,232 (protip !!pMmAiEwOm)@previous (C)
I know. And this started off as a perfectly innocent To4str thread...
!34Kas0OdzM joined in and replied with this 15 years ago, 1 hour later, 22 hours after the original post[^] [v] #193,348
@193,232 (protip !!pMmAiEwOm)
Business as usual.
It's either that or petty drama between the various posters, really.
Anyone with a shred of social competence should have been able to figure out these tricks on their own, but social competence is a rare commodity these days.
Business as usual.
It's either that or petty drama between the various posters, really.
Anyone with a shred of social competence should have been able to figure out these tricks on their own, but social competence is a rare commodity these days.
(Edited 19 seconds later.)
TrollBuster3000 joined in and replied with this 15 years ago, 6 hours later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #193,577
@193,232 (protip !!pMmAiEwOm)
> So, this is now a "how to groom children for my own sexual pleasure" thread?
>
> Whoa.
> So, this is now a "how to groom children for my own sexual pleasure" thread?
>
> Whoa.
Anonymous P joined in and replied with this 15 years ago, 5 hours later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #193,670
@192,627 (Homestar !RUNNERV7vk)
> Straight guys are hotter.
I just lost that teeny shred of respect I had for you guy.
I'll agree straight guys talk hotter and put on a better show, but as for ACTUAL SEX there is no fucking comparison. A sufficiently masculine homo guy almost always has more actual sexual experience and will outperform the average straight for that reason alone.
I suppose a superficial cockslut who's just looking to be used up could be happy with a straight dude. But you'd have to be a total bottom for that.
> Straight guys are hotter.
I just lost that teeny shred of respect I had for you guy.
I'll agree straight guys talk hotter and put on a better show, but as for ACTUAL SEX there is no fucking comparison. A sufficiently masculine homo guy almost always has more actual sexual experience and will outperform the average straight for that reason alone.
I suppose a superficial cockslut who's just looking to be used up could be happy with a straight dude. But you'd have to be a total bottom for that.
(Edited 21 seconds later.)
Homestar !RUNNERV7vk replied with this 15 years ago, 10 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #193,674
@previous (P)
I said HOTTER not BETTER PERFORMERS.
Yeah gay guys probably get more, but straight guys probably have more testosterone and are generally stronger. :)
> I suppose a superficial cockslut who's just looking to be used up could be happy with a straight dude. But you'd have to be a total bottom for that.
Were you under the impression I'm not?
I said HOTTER not BETTER PERFORMERS.
Yeah gay guys probably get more, but straight guys probably have more testosterone and are generally stronger. :)
> I suppose a superficial cockslut who's just looking to be used up could be happy with a straight dude. But you'd have to be a total bottom for that.
Were you under the impression I'm not?
Anonymous Q joined in and replied with this 15 years ago, 14 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #193,688
@previous (Homestar !RUNNERV7vk)
You're a hopeless queen. The only reason so many fags love straights is because they're outcasts to most of male society. Bagging a straight is a moment of approval. The ego-boost is coming from a fucked up brain that rejects its own kind, not the other dudes hormones.
You're a hopeless queen. The only reason so many fags love straights is because they're outcasts to most of male society. Bagging a straight is a moment of approval. The ego-boost is coming from a fucked up brain that rejects its own kind, not the other dudes hormones.
Homestar !RUNNERV7vk replied with this 15 years ago, 6 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #193,702
@previous (Q)
> The only reason so many fags love straights is because they're outcasts to most of male society.
There's probably some truth in that, but it's definitely not the only reason. There's a difference between emotional and sexual attraction, and most guys are pretty good at distinguishing the two.
> Bagging a straight is a moment of approval.
Definitely... but it's exactly the same as straight guys who "bag" lesbians. It's a confidence boost because you were hot or talented enough to attract someone that was unlikely. Like beating a game on hard mode. :)
The main reason I find straight guys attractive is because they look like guys and not girls (which is what many gay guys end up looking like when they express their femininity). I'm attracted to masculinity.
> The only reason so many fags love straights is because they're outcasts to most of male society.
There's probably some truth in that, but it's definitely not the only reason. There's a difference between emotional and sexual attraction, and most guys are pretty good at distinguishing the two.
> Bagging a straight is a moment of approval.
Definitely... but it's exactly the same as straight guys who "bag" lesbians. It's a confidence boost because you were hot or talented enough to attract someone that was unlikely. Like beating a game on hard mode. :)
The main reason I find straight guys attractive is because they look like guys and not girls (which is what many gay guys end up looking like when they express their femininity). I'm attracted to masculinity.
Anonymous Q replied with this 15 years ago, 7 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #193,726
@previous (Homestar !RUNNERV7vk)
> Definitely... but it's exactly the same as straight guys who "bag" lesbians. It's a confidence boost because you were hot or talented enough to attract someone that was unlikely. Like beating a game on hard mode. :)
Or perhaps the other party was just so desperate they'd take anything. You do realize when they're actually straight, they'd have rather had vagina. Like I said, this is something that exists only in your imagination. You're seeing what you want.
> The main reason I find straight guys attractive is because they look like guys and not girls (which is what many gay guys end up looking like when they express their femininity). I'm attracted to masculinity.
You should get to the woods more often. I feel you'd enjoy the bears.
> Definitely... but it's exactly the same as straight guys who "bag" lesbians. It's a confidence boost because you were hot or talented enough to attract someone that was unlikely. Like beating a game on hard mode. :)
Or perhaps the other party was just so desperate they'd take anything. You do realize when they're actually straight, they'd have rather had vagina. Like I said, this is something that exists only in your imagination. You're seeing what you want.
> The main reason I find straight guys attractive is because they look like guys and not girls (which is what many gay guys end up looking like when they express their femininity). I'm attracted to masculinity.
You should get to the woods more often. I feel you'd enjoy the bears.
Homestar !RUNNERV7vk replied with this 15 years ago, 8 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #193,740
@previous (Q)
> Or perhaps the other party was just so desperate they'd take anything. You do realize when they're actually straight, they'd have rather had vagina.
I don't disagree with any of that. It's still hot :P
And nah, I'm not into bears.
> Or perhaps the other party was just so desperate they'd take anything. You do realize when they're actually straight, they'd have rather had vagina.
I don't disagree with any of that. It's still hot :P
And nah, I'm not into bears.
Anonymous P replied with this 15 years ago, 23 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #193,780
@previous (Homestar !RUNNERV7vk)
> I don't disagree with any of that. It's still hot :P
The first couple of times, sure. But like anything, the novelty wears down.
> I don't disagree with any of that. It's still hot :P
The first couple of times, sure. But like anything, the novelty wears down.