RT scored an average Factual Grade of 41.8%, placing it in the 1st percentile of our dataset. This is the third-lowest score for any site that we analyzed.
Meta !Sober//iZs joined in and replied with this 3 years ago, 30 minutes later, 12 hours after the original post[^][v]#1,210,220
@1,210,166 (E)
Where I can find a list (not necessarily comprehensive as that would be way too much to ask) but just examples of RT spreading mis/disinformation?
I mean like "On March 2 2022 RT said X about Ukraine when it was actually Y".
I looked into their algorithm and I'd say it's about half good:
> Our news-rating algorithm scores each article along four metrics: (1) cited sources and quotes, (2) publication history, (3) writing tone, and (4) author expertise.
1) is pretty objective, 2) maybe, 3) and 4) just seem incredibly subjective to me. The "tone" an article is written in doesn't mean it's factual or not and author expertise seems hard to quantify (Andrew Anglin writes about Jewish issues a lot in his Daily Stormer - is he an expert??).
> Where I can find a list (not necessarily comprehensive as that would be way too much to ask) but just examples of RT spreading mis/disinformation? > > I mean like "On March 2 2022 RT said X about Ukraine when it was actually Y". > > I looked into their algorithm and I'd say it's about half good: > > > Our news-rating algorithm scores each article along four metrics: (1) cited sources and quotes, (2) publication history, (3) writing tone, and (4) author expertise. > > 1) is pretty objective, 2) maybe, 3) and 4) just seem incredibly subjective to me. The "tone" an article is written in doesn't mean it's factual or not and author expertise seems hard to quantify (Andrew Anglin writes about Jewish issues a lot in his Daily Stormer - is he an expert??).
Everything related to US intervention they post is usually fake. They said the chemical weapon attacks in Syria were false flags, and that the US intervened in Libya because they were switching to a gold standard.
Dr Richard Warnock joined in and replied with this 3 years ago, 47 seconds later, 21 hours after the original post[^][v]#1,210,359
@1,210,353 (E)
You seem very obsessed with this Matthew chap. Would you like a free consultation? I might be able to get him out of your head where he seems to live 24/7. It would be a shame for you to pass and the last thought in your mind would be of this Matthew fellow. I can help if you want it.
Dr Richard Warnock replied with this 3 years ago, 3 minutes later, 21 hours after the original post[^][v]#1,210,365
@previous (E)
I understand that in your mind everyone is Matt. You really are in need of some mental in depth probing to try and get him out of your head. I told you I can help. I have seen cases like this before. Please try and consider it before it is too late. Don't die with Matt on the brain.
Dr Richard Warnock double-posted this 3 years ago, 6 minutes later, 21 hours after the original post[^][v]#1,210,367
Suck don't it. Sucks so bad HA HA HA HA HA HA Just gripes your ass!!! The disease has even spread to the limp dick and weak minded mods here HA HA HA HA HA Now on with your obsession pussy boys!!!!
Meta !Sober//iZs replied with this 3 years ago, 0 seconds later, 21 hours after the original post[^][v]#1,210,370
@1,210,364 (E)
It's not Matt this time, it's one of those people who copy/pastes his stuff verbatim (not Nopaltzin that I can tell but it makes no difference either way). Which is really indistinguishable from the real thing - he's like one of those talking action figures that have like five pre-programmed catchphrases to say when you press the button.
Anonymous E replied with this 3 years ago, 1 minute later, 21 hours after the original post[^][v]#1,210,371
@previous (Meta !Sober//iZs)
Yeah, really sad there are any of these people, seeing as he's such a waste of spermbs. What does that say about the people who copy him verbatim? 🤔
> What does that say about the people who copy him verbatim?
It's motivated by the same desire - need for attention. He's taken his 181 IQ and built his negative attention-seeking and narcissism to a Trumpian level. It's why he hates Trump - he's a mirror image of him but actually successful at some things like having some of his companies not go bankrupt, making a lot of money, beautiful women, becoming President, having skyscrapers with his name on them, etc, etc.
So if you get off on negative attention seeking, why reinvent the wheel? His stuff works. How many times have you seen the "Okay Matt" "Nuh-uh I'm not Matt!" "Yeah huh!" "Nuh-uh"..... exchange like the one a bit upthread?
Meta !Sober//iZs replied with this 3 years ago, 7 minutes later, 22 hours after the original post[^][v]#1,210,377
@previous (E)
The stalking/victimization thing is manipulation. It's a way to control people. He absolutely revels in it and, if no one has "obsessed" over him in a few days, he will try to instigate it himself as anon.
Like Instagram - his shit is open to anyone in the world with an internet browser. He knows this - I have even explained it to him and gave him a link to the official Instagram page on how to restrict access to your posts several times. But if he locked it down he wouldn't have anything to whine about on Minichan.
Anonymous E replied with this 3 years ago, 8 minutes later, 22 hours after the original post[^][v]#1,210,378
@previous (Meta !Sober//iZs)
Right. He even has a Facebook page linked to his real name that is completely open. Yet, when anyone shares anything from that page... you know what happens.
Anonymous J replied with this 3 years ago, 32 minutes later, 22 hours after the original post[^][v]#1,210,379
@1,210,377 (Meta !Sober//iZs)
Do you consider someone who refreshes his posts over and over, then literally 5 seconds after a post, posts it here, to be normal? Yes or no?
Indy replied with this 3 years ago, 1 minute later, 23 hours after the original post[^][v]#1,210,384
@previous (E)
You had potential in high school, but never went to uni and now you work ahead end job in a shop, too afraid to even talk to girls. Yeah, go ahead and "mock" others. lol.
> why should the victim have to "lock down" his life? Victim blaming much? Why not tell the stalker to stop?
Why should you have to "lock down" your financial life? Why not just keep your life savings in a big brick of $100 bills and leave in plain view it on the passenger seat of your car all the time? If someone tries to steal it, you can just politely ask them to not do that.
Why does your front door have a lock? WHY SHOULD YOU HAVE TO "LOCK DOWN" YOUR LIFE??!?!?! Just tell the burglars to stop!
Attention all stalkers: stop stalking this man.
There. I told them ALL to stop. You know what that's going to accomplish? Jack shit. Do you know why? It's the same reason you own multiple firearms. Why do you need a gun? Just tell home invaders to stop! They HAVE to obey you, right?
> Do you consider someone who refreshes his posts over and over, then literally 5 seconds after a post, posts it here, to be normal? Yes or no?
Is it normal to cross-reference posting times to the SECOND? Who keeps track of this shit? Do you have like a spreadsheet where you log all your Facebook postings compared to when something got posted here? 😂