Topic: Would lab grown meat be considered Vegan?
Anonymous A started this discussion 3 years ago #107,639
It's not necessarily coming from slaughtered animals.
Green !StaYqkzUPc joined in and replied with this 3 years ago, 3 minutes later[^] [v] #1,209,193
No as the cells would still have to be taken from living animals.
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 3 years ago, 1 minute later, 5 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,209,195
Anonymous C joined in and replied with this 3 years ago, 1 minute later, 6 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,209,196
Anonymous C double-posted this 3 years ago, 20 seconds later, 7 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,209,197
Green !StaYqkzUPc replied with this 3 years ago, 1 minute later, 8 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,209,198
@1,209,195 (A)
@1,209,196 (C)
It's still an animal byproduct so it's not vegan. It would be vegetarian, not vegan.
@1,209,196 (C)
It's still an animal byproduct so it's not vegan. It would be vegetarian, not vegan.
Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU joined in and replied with this 3 years ago, 43 seconds later, 9 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,209,201
More importantly, would it be kosher?
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 3 years ago, 2 minutes later, 11 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,209,202
@1,209,198 (Green !StaYqkzUPc)
There are a lot of exceptions being made in Veganism and it's hard to determine just what anybody means when they say they're a Vegan.
There are a lot of exceptions being made in Veganism and it's hard to determine just what anybody means when they say they're a Vegan.
Green !StaYqkzUPc replied with this 3 years ago, 4 minutes later, 16 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,209,203
@previous (A)
Vegan means no meat or animal byproducts. That means no eggs, no dairy and no honey. I think using animals and extracting cells from them to grow lab meat would not be vegan as it opposes the vegan ethos that we should not exploit animals. It would technically be vegetarian though.
Vegan means no meat or animal byproducts. That means no eggs, no dairy and no honey. I think using animals and extracting cells from them to grow lab meat would not be vegan as it opposes the vegan ethos that we should not exploit animals. It would technically be vegetarian though.
Green !StaYqkzUPc double-posted this 3 years ago, 1 second later, 16 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,209,204
EGGS
(Edited 1 minute later.)
Anonymous C replied with this 3 years ago, 18 seconds later, 16 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,209,205
Anonymous C double-posted this 3 years ago, 1 minute later, 18 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,209,206
Anonymous E joined in and replied with this 3 years ago, 3 minutes later, 22 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,209,207
Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU replied with this 3 years ago, 47 seconds later, 22 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,209,208
Anonymous C replied with this 3 years ago, 5 minutes later, 28 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,209,209
@previous (Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU)
https://ar.wikisource.org/wiki/%D8%A7%D9%84%D9%82%D8%B1%D8%A2%D9%86_%D8%A7%D9%84%D9%83%D8%B1%D9%8A%D9%85
https://ar.wikisource.org/wiki/%D8%A7%D9%84%D9%82%D8%B1%D8%A2%D9%86_%D8%A7%D9%84%D9%83%D8%B1%D9%8A%D9%85
Green !StaYqkzUPc replied with this 3 years ago, 2 minutes later, 31 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,209,211
@1,209,207 (E)
I think that's because the women can agree to it so it's not the same as being exploited. Cows can't consent being hooked up to machines for their milk. Similar reasons why eating placentas could be technically vegetarian.
I think that's because the women can agree to it so it's not the same as being exploited. Cows can't consent being hooked up to machines for their milk. Similar reasons why eating placentas could be technically vegetarian.
Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU replied with this 3 years ago, 50 seconds later, 31 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,209,212
Anonymous E replied with this 3 years ago, 31 seconds later, 32 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,209,213
@1,209,211 (Green !StaYqkzUPc)
I wonder though, if you take a DNA sample from an animal and it doesn't harm it, is it exploitation?
I wonder though, if you take a DNA sample from an animal and it doesn't harm it, is it exploitation?
Anonymous C replied with this 3 years ago, 29 seconds later, 32 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,209,214
Anonymous F joined in and replied with this 3 years ago, 29 seconds later, 33 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,209,215
Anonymous C replied with this 3 years ago, 4 minutes later, 37 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,209,216
Anonymous F replied with this 3 years ago, 10 minutes later, 48 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,209,217
@previous (C)
you can suck off your brother and it would not only be vegan, but it might take the edge off and you could relax and stop shitposting for a moment
you can suck off your brother and it would not only be vegan, but it might take the edge off and you could relax and stop shitposting for a moment
Anonymous C replied with this 3 years ago, 10 minutes later, 58 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,209,218
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 3 years ago, 31 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #1,209,219
@1,209,203 (Green !StaYqkzUPc)
As noted before, Veganism is anything now as a lot of Vegans do not know what being Vegan actually is.
As noted before, Veganism is anything now as a lot of Vegans do not know what being Vegan actually is.
Anonymous F replied with this 3 years ago, 2 hours later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,209,276
Green !StaYqkzUPc replied with this 3 years ago, 8 hours later, 12 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,209,311
Lady D !Pool..v42s joined in and replied with this 3 years ago, 5 hours later, 18 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,209,334
Anonymous H joined in and replied with this 3 years ago, 24 minutes later, 18 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,209,338
Anonymous I joined in and replied with this 3 years ago, 2 hours later, 20 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,209,356
Lady D !Pool..v42s replied with this 3 years ago, 2 hours later, 23 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,209,388
Anonymous J joined in and replied with this 3 years ago, 5 minutes later, 23 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,209,390
Green !StaYqkzUPc replied with this 3 years ago, 6 minutes later, 23 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,209,392
No. A human can not survive a nuke. Maybe if they're in the outer blast radius, but you wouldn't want to survive in that case.
Lady D !Pool..v42s replied with this 3 years ago, 2 minutes later, 23 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,209,394
@1,209,390 (J)
We should probably preemptively strike imo, you never know what those green skinned shape shifting fuckers are planning
We should probably preemptively strike imo, you never know what those green skinned shape shifting fuckers are planning
Green !StaYqkzUPc replied with this 3 years ago, 17 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,209,397
Anonymous K joined in and replied with this 3 years ago, 19 hours later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,209,481
@1,209,392 (Green !StaYqkzUPc)
Oh,so your worried about not just you...but the ones who provide your 'Benefits'..
Oh,so your worried about not just you...but the ones who provide your 'Benefits'..