Topic: Doctor Who
Anonymous A started this discussion 3 years ago #107,557
Anyone still keep up?
Anonymous B joined in and replied with this 3 years ago, 1 minute later[^] [v] #1,208,338
implying any of us ever gave a shit about that gay ass show
Kook !!rcSrAtaAC joined in and replied with this 3 years ago, 4 minutes later, 6 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,208,343
I didn't know it was still on. Who's the current doctor?
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 3 years ago, 2 minutes later, 8 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,208,346
@previous (Kook !!rcSrAtaAC)
David Tennant. lol
@1,208,338 (B)
You never witnessed the shitstorm when the first female doctor was cast? Really? Matt even had his Nurse Who shtick.
David Tennant. lol
@1,208,338 (B)
You never witnessed the shitstorm when the first female doctor was cast? Really? Matt even had his Nurse Who shtick.
Anonymous B replied with this 3 years ago, 2 minutes later, 11 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,208,349
Anonymous D joined in and replied with this 3 years ago, 2 minutes later, 13 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,208,350
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 3 years ago, 14 seconds later, 13 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,208,351
@1,208,349 (B)
The last three-to-four years. Thirteenth Doctor was played by actress Jodie Whittaker.
The last three-to-four years. Thirteenth Doctor was played by actress Jodie Whittaker.
Kook !!rcSrAtaAC replied with this 3 years ago, 13 seconds later, 14 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,208,352
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 3 years ago, 2 minutes later, 16 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,208,354
@previous (Kook !!rcSrAtaAC)
Yes, but I still need to watch Jodie’s last season so I can’t discuss it from an episode perspective since I’ve been trying to avoid spoilers until I watch it.
David Tennant is apparently back as the fourteenth doctor for a few specials and then he’s going to regenerate.
I think Catherine Tate came back too.
Yes, but I still need to watch Jodie’s last season so I can’t discuss it from an episode perspective since I’ve been trying to avoid spoilers until I watch it.
David Tennant is apparently back as the fourteenth doctor for a few specials and then he’s going to regenerate.
I think Catherine Tate came back too.
(Edited 20 seconds later.)
Matt "The Shagger" Hancock joined in and replied with this 3 years ago, 2 minutes later, 18 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,208,356
Kook !!rcSrAtaAC replied with this 3 years ago, 1 minute later, 19 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,208,357
@1,208,354 (A)
Oh its some young black actor I've never heard of. They're making a big deal of him playing a gay doctor, even though he's definitely had a male romance in the past
Oh its some young black actor I've never heard of. They're making a big deal of him playing a gay doctor, even though he's definitely had a male romance in the past
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 3 years ago, 5 minutes later, 25 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,208,364
@previous (Kook !!rcSrAtaAC)
He’s not the current doctor yet. He’s the fifteenth doctor. Tennant returned for a few specials as the fourteenth which means he’s technically has three incarnations. And I’m just going to start Jodie’s last season so I’ll fill everyone in on details they’re curious about.
He’s not the current doctor yet. He’s the fifteenth doctor. Tennant returned for a few specials as the fourteenth which means he’s technically has three incarnations. And I’m just going to start Jodie’s last season so I’ll fill everyone in on details they’re curious about.
(Edited 51 seconds later.)
Anonymous B replied with this 3 years ago, 2 minutes later, 27 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,208,366
Anonymous F joined in and replied with this 3 years ago, 4 minutes later, 31 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,208,367
*Nurse Who
Anonymous B replied with this 3 years ago, 2 minutes later, 33 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,208,369
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 3 years ago, 3 minutes later, 37 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,208,372
I forgot to mention that Disney+ is going to be the platform for all future episodes and specials outside of the UK as the BBC entered into a partnership with them which also includes an increased budget. They have access to that Disney money now.
(Edited 39 seconds later.)
Anonymous F replied with this 3 years ago, 23 seconds later, 37 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,208,373
boof joined in and replied with this 3 years ago, 51 seconds later, 38 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,208,374
I've lapsed my viewings since I haven't been downloading a fuckin thing for a while
it's well done enough but Jeepers it can get morbid
it's well done enough but Jeepers it can get morbid
Kook !!rcSrAtaAC replied with this 3 years ago, 5 minutes later, 44 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,208,377
Anonymous F replied with this 3 years ago, 1 minute later, 45 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,208,379
@previous (Kook !!rcSrAtaAC)
Feets, don' fails me now! I's sees a gh...gh...gh...ghost! Lawdy mercy!
Feets, don' fails me now! I's sees a gh...gh...gh...ghost! Lawdy mercy!
Anonymous B replied with this 3 years ago, 53 seconds later, 46 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,208,382
Kook !!rcSrAtaAC replied with this 3 years ago, 1 minute later, 48 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,208,387
@previous (B)
Because this show makes a very big deal anytime someone involved is a perceived minority
Also it should have been Idris Alba
Because this show makes a very big deal anytime someone involved is a perceived minority
Also it should have been Idris Alba
Anonymous B replied with this 3 years ago, 4 minutes later, 52 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,208,394
@previous (Kook !!rcSrAtaAC)
> Because this show makes a very big deal anytime someone involved is a perceived minority
it really doesn't. you sound like the "teach the controversy" crowd. there's literally no controversy
> Because this show makes a very big deal anytime someone involved is a perceived minority
it really doesn't. you sound like the "teach the controversy" crowd. there's literally no controversy
Kook !!rcSrAtaAC replied with this 3 years ago, 1 minute later, 54 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,208,396
Anonymous F replied with this 3 years ago, 16 seconds later, 54 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,208,397
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 3 years ago, 8 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #1,208,402
@1,208,396 (Kook !!rcSrAtaAC)
Wait, how do they do this? And I’m pretty sure Idris Alba is too big a star for this show. It doesn’t exactly have Disney money yet.
Wait, how do they do this? And I’m pretty sure Idris Alba is too big a star for this show. It doesn’t exactly have Disney money yet.
Kook !!rcSrAtaAC replied with this 3 years ago, 2 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #1,208,404
@previous (A)
You've been alive and aware of this show for a very long time
Have you no memory of how the media (and fans) reacted to a female doctor?
You yourself posted a million topics about how there should be a trans Doctor, even though that doesn't make sense
You've been alive and aware of this show for a very long time
Have you no memory of how the media (and fans) reacted to a female doctor?
You yourself posted a million topics about how there should be a trans Doctor, even though that doesn't make sense
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 3 years ago, 3 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #1,208,405
@previous (Kook !!rcSrAtaAC)
Huh? A female doctor still is pretty significant for a show that has had a long history of male protagonists. Since 2005, Doctor Who was sort of always a progressive show so it makes sense they’d celebrate milestones.
Maybe less significant since they basically revealed there were two female doctors.
Huh? A female doctor still is pretty significant for a show that has had a long history of male protagonists. Since 2005, Doctor Who was sort of always a progressive show so it makes sense they’d celebrate milestones.
Maybe less significant since they basically revealed there were two female doctors.
(Edited 48 seconds later.)
Anonymous F replied with this 3 years ago, 32 seconds later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #1,208,407
Kook !!rcSrAtaAC replied with this 3 years ago, 4 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #1,208,409
@1,208,405 (A)
I don't see having an actor of a different sex or race on a show as a milestone
Also are you pretending to not be Catherine?
I don't see having an actor of a different sex or race on a show as a milestone
Also are you pretending to not be Catherine?
Anonymous H joined in and replied with this 3 years ago, 18 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #1,208,413
@previous (Kook !!rcSrAtaAC)
It really isn't. It's the same thing as changing the gender of the Ghostbusters. Just trying to pander to the female demographic.
It really isn't. It's the same thing as changing the gender of the Ghostbusters. Just trying to pander to the female demographic.
Kook !!rcSrAtaAC replied with this 3 years ago, 7 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #1,208,414
@previous (H)
I agree. I don't think it was a horrible movie, but it wasn't memorable
Also the director called anyone who didn't like it, misogynistic, and that was upsetting to me because I enjoy some of his books and it made him look ugly
I agree. I don't think it was a horrible movie, but it wasn't memorable
Also the director called anyone who didn't like it, misogynistic, and that was upsetting to me because I enjoy some of his books and it made him look ugly
Anonymous H replied with this 3 years ago, 6 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #1,208,415
@previous (Kook !!rcSrAtaAC)
Yes, the movie was fine, and that seems like a bit of an overreaction. He took a huge gamble in changing up the formula, and tried to turn the blame on others when it didn't work.
Yes, the movie was fine, and that seems like a bit of an overreaction. He took a huge gamble in changing up the formula, and tried to turn the blame on others when it didn't work.
Anonymous B replied with this 3 years ago, 54 seconds later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #1,208,416
Anonymous B double-posted this 3 years ago, 1 minute later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #1,208,417
@1,208,409 (Kook !!rcSrAtaAC)
> I don't see having an actor of a different sex or race on a show as a milestone
yet you had to mention, unprovoked, race like it was some big thing. no one believes you.
> I don't see having an actor of a different sex or race on a show as a milestone
yet you had to mention, unprovoked, race like it was some big thing. no one believes you.
Kook !!rcSrAtaAC replied with this 3 years ago, 1 minute later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #1,208,419
@1,208,415 (H)
That gay rom com by the Billy on the Street is giving the same energy
I was actually going to go to the theater and see it, but he called everyone who doesn't see it a homophobe, so I'm just going to pirate it
That gay rom com by the Billy on the Street is giving the same energy
I was actually going to go to the theater and see it, but he called everyone who doesn't see it a homophobe, so I'm just going to pirate it
Kook !!rcSrAtaAC double-posted this 3 years ago, 15 seconds later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #1,208,421
Anonymous H replied with this 3 years ago, 2 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #1,208,423
@1,208,419 (Kook !!rcSrAtaAC)
I hate how people think throwing accusations at their audience is any way to get people into theatres.
I hate how people think throwing accusations at their audience is any way to get people into theatres.
Anonymous B replied with this 3 years ago, 4 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #1,208,427
@1,208,419 (Kook !!rcSrAtaAC)
> I was actually going to go to the theater and see it, but he called everyone who doesn't see it a homophobe, so I'm just going to pirate it
That'll show 'em!
> I was actually going to go to the theater and see it, but he called everyone who doesn't see it a homophobe, so I'm just going to pirate it
That'll show 'em!