Topic: Jet fuel weakens steel beams

Anonymous A started this discussion 3 years ago #107,265

Oh yes it does.

Anonymous B joined in and replied with this 3 years ago, 2 minutes later[^] [v] #1,204,523

And semen when deposited into a rectum can turn a clay-like turd to mush.

Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 3 years ago, 19 seconds later, 2 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,204,524

@previous (B)
lol

mandark joined in and replied with this 3 years ago, 17 minutes later, 20 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,204,542

finally, closure

boof joined in and replied with this 3 years ago, 51 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #1,204,578

@OP

> Oh yes it does.

great tune by John Lennon

Anonymous E joined in and replied with this 3 years ago, 1 hour later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,204,603

Cool, why was molten steel found on the scene?

Jet fuel can take down a building, but clearly something else was at work.

Anonymous F joined in and replied with this 3 years ago, 10 minutes later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,204,606

It was an inside job.

boof replied with this 3 years ago, 1 hour later, 4 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,204,609

@1,204,578 (boof)
oh shit that was Mick Jagger I mean

oh hang on, it turns out both the Beatles and the Stones have songs with "yes it is" in it

(Edited 2 minutes later.)

Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 3 years ago, 5 hours later, 10 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,204,645

@1,204,603 (E)
https://www.soci.org/chemistry-and-industry/cni-data/2011/19/911-collapse-due-to-metal-reaction

Anonymous G joined in and replied with this 3 years ago, 4 hours later, 14 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,204,679

@previous (A)
In 2002 did you believe that Iraq had WMD? All the world's top experts said that it did.

Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 3 years ago, 1 hour later, 16 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,204,718

@previous (G)
Fallacy. Just because people have been wrong before does not invalidate entire fields of knowledge.

Anonymous G replied with this 3 years ago, 2 minutes later, 16 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,204,720

@previous (A)
It isn't a fallacy. It does however suggest you should taper your confidence.

Anonymous H joined in and replied with this 3 years ago, 9 minutes later, 16 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,204,725

@1,204,679 (G)
Was Saddam's widespread gassing of the Kurds NOT a War Crime?

Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 3 years ago, 55 seconds later, 16 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,204,726

@1,204,720 (G)
It IS a fallacy.

Anonymous G replied with this 3 years ago, 9 minutes later, 16 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,204,729

@previous (A)
In 2002 did you believe that Iraq had WMD?

Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 3 years ago, 1 minute later, 16 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,204,730

@previous (G)
No, because I did not trust Bush overall.

Anonymous G replied with this 3 years ago, 6 minutes later, 16 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,204,732

@previous (A)
So you knew better than the world's top experts in defense? You knew more than the CIA? Quick call the White House!

Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 3 years ago, 2 minutes later, 16 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,204,733

@previous (G)
Nope. I just believed Bush to be a liar. And your argument is still a fallacy.

Anonymous G replied with this 3 years ago, 3 minutes later, 16 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,204,735

@previous (A)
Which fallacy? It wasn't about Bush. It was about the world's top experts in defense and national security.

Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 3 years ago, 4 minutes later, 16 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,204,738

@previous (G)
You argument is something like this: "a mathematician has been wrong at least once in the past, therefore all of Mathematics is wrong and untrustworthy." Fallacy.

Anonymous G replied with this 3 years ago, 5 minutes later, 16 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,204,747

@previous (A)
Now you are using a straw man.

Why did you believe you knew more than the world's top experts in defense and national security?

Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 3 years ago, 3 minutes later, 16 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,204,755

@previous (G)
Suck my giant cock and go fuck yourself! Hahahahaha!

Anonymous G replied with this 3 years ago, 4 minutes later, 16 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,204,763

@previous (A)
Psychotic fucktard. Suck my huge penis. Oh and Bye.

boof replied with this 3 years ago, 5 hours later, 22 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,204,898

@1,204,679 (G)

> In 2002 did you believe that Iraq had WMD? All the world's top experts said that it did.

That is not true. As one example, there were reportings that the "aluminum tubes" that Cheney kept yapping about were not good evidence at all, yet that asshole kept repeating his bullshit about it anyway.

Anonymous I joined in and replied with this 3 years ago, 1 hour later, 23 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,204,970

Read the book, look at the before and after (altered) documents. Then you will have all the proof you need if Iraq had WMD. Easy peasy and much better than talking out your asshole about something you don't know.
https://www.amazon.com/Prosecution-George-W-Bush-Murder/dp/159315481X

(Edited 1 minute later.)

Anonymous H replied with this 3 years ago, 12 hours later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,205,055

@previous (I)
-64% cause NOONES buying such an outlandish title.

(Edited 25 seconds later.)

Minichan