Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 2.5 years ago, 3 minutes later, 14 minutes after the original post[^][v]#1,203,307
@previous (Kook !!rcSrAtaAC)
Here's how a normal conversation works:
Person A: asks a question.
Person B: answers it and optionally asks a follow-up question.
Person A: answers it and optionally asks a follow-up question.
Person B: answers it and optionally asks a follow-up question.
...
Here's how a conversation does not work:
Person A: asks a question.
Person B: asks a question and demands Person A answer before anything can go forward.
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 2.5 years ago, 1 minute later, 31 minutes after the original post[^][v]#1,203,320
@1,203,315 (Kook !!rcSrAtaAC)
I can't stop you from doing a lot of things like, robbery, grand theft auto, murder, war crimes, ...
That must mean you should do them?
Anonymous D replied with this 2.5 years ago, 1 minute later, 33 minutes after the original post[^][v]#1,203,323
@1,203,316 (A)
I can't read either Brie or Kook's mind so I can't know for sure what really motivated the marriage. Maybe it was true love and they would have married even if Brie was homeless living in a cardboard box with a net worth of $0.50. Maybe Kook just wanted a life of Teslas and mansions and grabbed her meal ticket. Maybe it was half and half. Or something else.
So I'm agnostic on this one. I think Brie's wealth was a significant contributing factor to the marriage but not the only one. But again I don't (and can't) know for sure. So who knows?
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 2.5 years ago, 1 minute later, 46 minutes after the original post[^][v]#1,203,326
@1,203,323 (D)
Thanks for your thoughtful and cogent reply. I sure wish at least one of the two people who could tell us what was going through Kook or Brie's mind would tell us.
It does seem something of a coincidence that once Brie found a few hundred in her back pocket, she's suddenly found herself hitched up.
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 2.5 years ago, 2 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^][v]#1,203,336
@1,203,331 (Kook !!rcSrAtaAC)
Really? I remember just a few years ago you were on here saying trans women aren't real women and some such. Amazing how quickly things changes. And, yet, how some things never do...
Kook !!rcSrAtaAC double-posted this 2.5 years ago, 57 seconds later, 1 hour after the original post[^][v]#1,203,344
@1,203,341 (A)
I had a major accident that changed the trajectory of my life completely. This is compounded by a variety of other health problems I was born with
Anonymous A (OP) double-posted this 2.5 years ago, 56 seconds later, 1 hour after the original post[^][v]#1,203,359
@1,203,356 (Kook !!rcSrAtaAC)
Thanks again for proving you don't give a shit about anyone. Also, who I am doesn't matter and doesn't change who you are, no matter how much you wish it would.
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 2.5 years ago, 2 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[^][v]#1,203,383
@previous (Kook !!rcSrAtaAC)
As I said before, you seem very confused.
Keep avoiding the difficult questions. Much easier to turn this into a slap fight like you do to any discussion or argument you can't win (aka all of them).
> OP is crazy though and Kook should really just ignore him.
This
Idk why people have such a hate boner for kook. Some people do and have changed while posting on this board, some for the better and some for the worse. And some just seem to be the same, But eventually they probably won't be.
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 2.5 years ago, 1 minute later, 14 hours after the original post[^][v]#1,203,471
@previous (Kook !!rcSrAtaAC)
This thread wasn't to have a discussion with you. The aims were much more broad. You hijacked it. So it seems you are the one who came here to argue.
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 2.5 years ago, 1 minute later, 14 hours after the original post[^][v]#1,203,487
@previous (LadyD !Pool..v42s)
I've known you for a long time and I seriously question whether or not you are capable of following this discussion. If a quick re-read of the thread doesn't help you, I don't think anything can.
LadyD !Pool..v42s replied with this 2.5 years ago, 2 minutes later, 15 hours after the original post[^][v]#1,203,495
@1,203,487 (A)
Well what I'm saying is, without any context, you could think that the coincidences were planned, but with all the context it doesn't add up to being so insidious. There was a period where I too was skeptical of how kook had talked about trans folk in the past as she evolved into who she is today, but I feel her growth is genuine!
LadyD !Pool..v42s replied with this 2.5 years ago, 48 seconds later, 15 hours after the original post[^][v]#1,203,506
@1,203,498 (A)
She's been a friend to me and several other trans forum members. The only transperson she wasn't friendly with was recently with the squeegee stuff.
Anonymous H replied with this 2.5 years ago, 2 minutes later, 15 hours after the original post[^][v]#1,203,514
@1,203,484 (A)
i've been a participant in this topic. why are you trying to imply that i've communicated with you or anybody else anything bad about my relationship with Kook? you don't even talk to me, we used to be kind of friends and you ghosted... several years ago by now.
I know plenty about you. You post about yourself nearly as much as Matt Ross-teat Miller. And anyone with two brain cells can read between the lines and infer a whole lot more. You're an open book.
Anonymous A (OP) quintuple-posted this 2.5 years ago, 57 seconds later, 1 day after the original post[^][v]#1,203,549
@1,203,514 (H) > why are you trying to imply that i've communicated with you or anybody else anything bad about my relationship with Kook
What? Where did I do that?
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 2.5 years ago, 4 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^][v]#1,203,553
@previous (Kook !!rcSrAtaAC)
You couldn't be further from the truth. Start being honest with yourself. Then maybe you can begin to be honest with others.
Anonymous N joined in and replied with this 2.5 years ago, 1 minute later, 1 day after the original post[^][v]#1,203,559
Can you all just for once shut the fuck up about Brie and Kook's relationship?
It is clear that their relationship isn't only about the money. They clearly care about one another a lot.
Were you the one who also made that one thread on Tinychan about how we're suppose to "save Brie?"
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 2.5 years ago, 5 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^][v]#1,203,586
@1,203,559 (N) > It is clear that their relationship isn't only about the money. They clearly care about one another a lot.
Interesting, because we have quite a few people in here saying the opposite. What makes you say this?
Anonymous N replied with this 2.5 years ago, 1 minute later, 1 day after the original post[^][v]#1,203,591
@1,203,586 (A)
Have there been any domestic abuse charges? Have there been any signs of domestic abuse? Have there been any signs that Kook only cares about Brie's money? Where is teh evidence?
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 2.5 years ago, 2 days later, 3 days after the original post[^][v]#1,204,249
So kook goes from a transphobic bigot to marrying a transwoman in just a few short years. I'm not seeing the connection or transformative element here and no one ITT has been able to help me out. Aside from the connection I outlined in the OP. It is often the simplest explanation that stands the test of time. And the power of money has certainly stood that test...
Anonymous O joined in and replied with this 2.5 years ago, 4 minutes later, 3 days after the original post[^][v]#1,204,262
@1,204,249 (A)
You don't know anything about their lives, other than they married each other! You're a jealous fucking cunt with a pair of cancerous fuckholes
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 2.5 years ago, 5 minutes later, 3 days after the original post[^][v]#1,204,285
@1,204,277 (Kook !!rcSrAtaAC)
I've yet to receive an answer, other than a few that chimed in and provided supporting arguments for my original suspicion.
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 2.5 years ago, 2 minutes later, 3 days after the original post[^][v]#1,204,288
@previous (Kook !!rcSrAtaAC)
There are and remain major questions about those answers. Two unreliable narrators giving unreliable answers is not what I'm looking for
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 2.5 years ago, 7 minutes later, 3 days after the original post[^][v]#1,204,294
@previous (Kook !!rcSrAtaAC)
I'm not like you, Kook. It's not about who's making the argument, it's about the argument that's made. I know it's a difficult concept to grasp, but I think you can do it if you try. Not that you will.
> You're right. I don't know anything about people I've interacted with for nearly 15 years now.
I already stated publicly that you ghosted me basically right after we started interacting elsewhere ... your ass hasn't been around me in any capacity other than your anonymous shitposts right here on this board. Don't go acting like you have some special privileged information, bitch
> I'm not like you, Kook. It's not about who's making the argument, it's about the argument that's made. I know it's a difficult concept to grasp, but I think you can do it if you try. Not that you will.
you're the one trying to claim you have some special insight into our lives... your identity is now pertinent to your argument, deal with it
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 2.5 years ago, 1 minute later, 3 days after the original post[^][v]#1,204,305
@1,204,302 (H)
No, to be clear, I'm claiming anyone who's been on this forum for over a decade can have enough insight to make a few simple inferences here and there. Now, the number of people with the ability to do so, due to god knows what mental issues, is not as large as it seems, but the information is all out there.
> Thanks for your thoughtful and cogent reply. I sure wish at least one of the two people who could tell us what was going through Kook or Brie's mind would tell us.
So now that this has happened, why move goalposts?
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 2.5 years ago, 12 minutes later, 3 days after the original post[^][v]#1,204,328
@1,204,307 (H)
Knowing how you were and seeing how you are now, I know how you are now is not who you are. So, when you again become what you were, I want you to read this message. Consider it not a message for you, but for future you: a virtual time capsule with a message meant for the, hopefully, not too distant you:
You can be loved for the woman you are by someone who respects you. You do not need to settle for someone looking for wealth and financial security. You do not need to settle for someone with mental problems and a habit of using psychological manipulation in her every discussion. You do not need to settle for someone who spent the better part of her life resenting you and everything you ever were. You can and will find someone good enough for you. You just have to start looking.
i wish you well.
And, no, I won't be responding to more of your posts in this current era. It pains me to see the shell of what you've become under the malicious influences you've let dominate your life.
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 2.5 years ago, 5 minutes later, 3 days after the original post[^][v]#1,204,349
@1,204,344 (Kook !!rcSrAtaAC)
Don't be so sure lol
Regardless of when you finally croak, you'll always be a washed up bitch. Nothing more than a glorified hooker. Willing to put up an act, even faking an entire worldview for a few dollars. Not only that, but you're also a John. You've said it yourself: you only help those who are nice to you. That's not charity. That's prostitution.
Kook !!rcSrAtaAC replied with this 2.5 years ago, 6 minutes later, 3 days after the original post[^][v]#1,204,350
@previous (A)
You're literally a prostitue and you get used as a hole for men who won't go out with you in public
You think being a woman means making gross jokes and posting lewd pics, because the only women who could stand to be around you pre transition were also hookers
You were so jealous that I'm married that you made up a fiance to make yourself feel better and look like you have loved ones
You have no power to change my life in any way, and no insight to change your own, but also think you can see the future
LadyD !Pool..v42s replied with this 2.5 years ago, 3 minutes later, 3 days after the original post[^][v]#1,204,369
@1,204,338 (A)
Again I'm going to point out that chicken has spoken of her own accord, but this time I'll point out that you won't communicate with her in the present. So there's a goalpost you setup, and then moved.
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 2.5 years ago, 46 seconds later, 3 days after the original post[^][v]#1,204,436
@1,204,431 (Kook !!rcSrAtaAC)
Nice strawman. My posts were never filled with anger and hate as yours always were. Not even close to the same thing and you know it.
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 2.5 years ago, 4 minutes later, 3 days after the original post[^][v]#1,204,445
@1,204,439 (Kook !!rcSrAtaAC)
You have to be seriously autistic to think using a slur and using a slur in a hateful, anger-filled way are the same thing. But I know, sadly, that you aren't. You're just being dishonest and manipulative as usual.
Anonymous F replied with this 2.5 years ago, 1 minute later, 3 days after the original post[^][v]#1,204,465
@1,204,462 (A)
I independently think you're a disgusting whore who thinks femininity and sexuality are synonymous. I've thought that since you first posted your picture and offered up your phone number to everyone like a prostitute.
Anonymous A (OP) double-posted this 2.5 years ago, 1 minute later, 3 days after the original post[^][v]#1,204,467
@1,204,465 (F)
Funny how the tenor of everyone's posts and the views they echo back to me all started to align once kook ramped up her libel game. But carry on you dimwitted tool.
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 2.5 years ago, 5 minutes later, 3 days after the original post[^][v]#1,204,480
@previous (Kook !!rcSrAtaAC)
Sure. Waste your money. Fucking bitch.
I've tried to make amends with you countless times now and it always comes back to you threatening to use "your" money against me because I don't fit under your thumb like all the other trans women you've taken to controlling. The only real thing you've accomplished in your life is being born a female. A shitty one at that.
LadyD !Pool..v42s replied with this 2.5 years ago, 55 seconds later, 3 days after the original post[^][v]#1,204,484
@1,204,386 (A)
If the point wasn't about kook, why not frame the question to not literally mention kook?
@1,204,389 (A)
Every time someone has stated that they e observed nothing but love between the two of them, you jump to call them a shill, insult their intelligence, tell them that they're wrong, or something else. There's literally nothing anyone to say to change your mind apparently since no one has the comprehension to see what you have seen.
Anonymous H replied with this 2.5 years ago, 4 minutes later, 3 days after the original post[^][v]#1,204,485
@previous (LadyD !Pool..v42s)
Nikki has seemingly been hitting the time crystals again... she doesn't even recognize me as being me, because she's lost in a time trip. She thinks i'm going to reverse course and end up being the miserable person I used to be, but she couldn't be more wrong
LadyD !Pool..v42s replied with this 2.5 years ago, 12 minutes later, 3 days after the original post[^][v]#1,204,488
@previous (H)
Its like not being able to process someone else's growth because you haven't grown by choice, or have grown in a different way and can't reconcile how different people are from each other
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 2.5 years ago, 9 minutes later, 3 days after the original post[^][v]#1,204,490
@1,204,483 (Kook !!rcSrAtaAC)
No one's talking shit except you. This thread wasn't even about you, not in a meaningful way anyway. But don't let me stop you from making everything about yourself, as I knew you would.
Anonymous A (OP) double-posted this 2.5 years ago, 3 minutes later, 3 days after the original post[^][v]#1,204,493
@1,204,484 (LadyD !Pool..v42s)
Believe it or not, I actually like you. But even my patience wears thin since it seems you've reduced yourself to parroting whatever psychological manipulation and lies kooks spreading this day or the next. It almost seems like your posts are for sale, unofficially, that is. BUt I didn't just go there.
Anonymous H replied with this 2.5 years ago, 4 minutes later, 3 days after the original post[^][v]#1,204,502
@1,204,490 (A)
you certainly didn't mean to have a discussion with me, since you've tried to exclude both my wife and i from speaking in a topic meant to be about us
Anonymous G replied with this 2.5 years ago, 2 hours later, 4 days after the original post[^][v]#1,204,604
This isn't even Squeegee you dimwits. The text voice is completely different. Squeegee would have posted rambling walls of text, he would have been rambling on and on about fucking men or whatever he does now.
I still think OP is a psycho but I no longer feel sorry for Kook and her merry band of idiots, you're all feeding this troll like morons I'm sure this topic will get to 1000 replies with your help.
squeegee joined in and replied with this 2.3 years ago, 2 months later, 2 months after the original post[^][v]#1,216,859
@1,203,567 (Kook !!rcSrAtaAC)
not me. for fuck's sake, this is what y'all keep spamming my inbox over? fuck the fuck off. i want nothing to do with bullshit kook drama. eat a dick chumps.
squeegee double-posted this 2.3 years ago, 16 minutes later, 2 months after the original post[^][v]#1,216,860
@1,204,295 (H)
oh, you mean on steam? hi brie. yeah, this post wasn't me, haven't been me, never was me. i don't know anything about what y'all are talking about. i've been getting spam emails since last summer. someone making a bunch of new Gmails keeps trying to bait me with drama and i have no way of blocking them. it's god damned annoying.
squeegee replied with this 2.3 years ago, 22 minutes later, 2 months after the original post[^][v]#1,217,236
@previous (N)
don't look at me, i just read this thread today. i was getting emails with links to kook and random anon shit talking about me without any context. i don't have a problem with either one of them, but they seem to think they have a problem with me. they have a problem with whoever they THINK is me for some reason, but it's literally not been ME they hate. they're fucking assholes who can't shut up about me, but it's none of my business. literally none of this involves me. at all.
squeegee double-posted this 2.3 years ago, 6 minutes later, 2 months after the original post[^][v]#1,217,237
just to be clear, i didn't make this thread, nor have i posted on minichan since last September all the way up to the day before yesterday. for 4 months or more i haven't even looked at minichan.
squeegee triple-posted this 2.3 years ago, 9 minutes later, 2 months after the original post[^][v]#1,217,238
and, i'll add, they were told. over and over people kept telling them they weren't talking to squeegee, but no, everyone is squeegee and they just had to keep talking shit about me behind my back HUNDREDS of times like they're better than me.
so. fuck them personally. i don't give a fuck about their relationship, but they're both shitty assholes. so fuck em. i'm happy they have each other. that's great for them.
Mazel Tov. but they can get fucked.
apparently they think I'm transgender and fucking hate me for it, talk shit constantly, accuse me of the worst kinds of insulting small minded bigotry - over and over and over- persistently and no matter what anyone tells them THEY JUST DO IT MORE.
so, real pieces of shit those two.
got nothing to say about their relationship though. congrats on that I guess? fucking dick heads.
@1,217,238 (squeegee)
So what is the deal? Have you had some kind of inner change or epiphany or something and you are no longer Buni/Harlot/whatever your trans self was called?
squeegee replied with this 2.3 years ago, 5 hours later, 2 months after the original post[^][v]#1,217,289
@1,217,249 (Meta !Sober//iZs)
you sound a lot like the person who emails me every few days. why are you so obsessed with me? just knock it off, please, i'm asking nicely. thanks.
Anonymous U double-posted this 2.3 years ago, 3 minutes later, 2 months after the original post[^][v]#1,217,337
@1,217,238 (squeegee)
If this is true (and I can easily believe it to be), maybe you should thank whoever was impersonating you. It's almost like you died and got to be a fly on the wall and see what everyone really thinks of you. Except you didn't die and you've just discovered that while people are thinking of you, there's not so much in the way of thought. And the little that there is is rotten.
squeegee replied with this 2.3 years ago, 5 hours later, 2 months after the original post[^][v]#1,217,421
@1,217,298 (Meta !Sober//iZs)
i'll answer this after you explain why you're obsessed with secretly emailing me to draw me into this particular conversation