Topic: Marjorie Tailor Green suggests cloning could “stabilize white birth rates”.
fubar started this discussion 3 years ago #106,926
What a gal!
Punkgothemo Indy joined in and replied with this 3 years ago, 16 minutes later[^] [v] #1,201,330
Link, please.
Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU joined in and replied with this 3 years ago, 12 minutes later, 29 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,201,331
She is correct.
boof joined in and replied with this 3 years ago, 13 minutes later, 42 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,201,332
we could shut that god damn birth rate down better if cunts like her didn't fuck with legal abortion
Punkgothemo Indy replied with this 3 years ago, 4 minutes later, 46 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,201,333
Link?
Anonymous E joined in and replied with this 3 years ago, 21 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #1,201,336
@previous (Punkgothemo Indy)
Do you have a source on that?
Source?
A source. I need a source.
Sorry, I mean I need a source that explicitly states your argument. This is just tangential to the discussion.
No, you can't make inferences and observations from the sources you've gathered. Any additional comments from you MUST be a subset of the information from the sources you've gathered.
You can't make normative statements from empirical evidence.
Do you have a degree in that field?
A college degree? In that field?
Then your arguments are invalid.
No, it doesn't matter how close those data points are correlated. Correlation does not equal causation.
Correlation does not equal causation.
CORRELATION. DOES. NOT. EQUAL. CAUSATION.
You still haven't provided me a valid source yet.
Nope, still haven't.
Do you have a source on that?
Source?
A source. I need a source.
Sorry, I mean I need a source that explicitly states your argument. This is just tangential to the discussion.
No, you can't make inferences and observations from the sources you've gathered. Any additional comments from you MUST be a subset of the information from the sources you've gathered.
You can't make normative statements from empirical evidence.
Do you have a degree in that field?
A college degree? In that field?
Then your arguments are invalid.
No, it doesn't matter how close those data points are correlated. Correlation does not equal causation.
Correlation does not equal causation.
CORRELATION. DOES. NOT. EQUAL. CAUSATION.
You still haven't provided me a valid source yet.
Nope, still haven't.
Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU replied with this 3 years ago, 4 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #1,201,337
Punkgothemo Indy replied with this 3 years ago, 4 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #1,201,338
shelly joined in and replied with this 3 years ago, 43 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,201,342
boof replied with this 3 years ago, 3 hours later, 5 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,201,361
soylent greens
Anonymous G joined in and replied with this 3 years ago, 9 hours later, 14 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,201,376
clones!