Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 4 years ago, 1 hour later, 2 hours after the original post[^][v]#1,199,064
@previous (B)
I think you're just another obsessed idiot who thinks everyone is Matt and cannot help making blatant or veiled references to him in every single post, no matter what the post is about.
Anonymous B replied with this 4 years ago, 3 hours later, 6 hours after the original post[^][v]#1,199,075
Meta !Sober//iZs joined in and replied with this 4 years ago, 6 hours later, 12 hours after the original post[^][v]#1,199,083
@1,199,064 (A)
Just knock it off already. Everyone knows who everyone else is.
Anonymous F joined in and replied with this 4 years ago, 1 hour later, 13 hours after the original post[^][v]#1,199,085
@1,199,064 (A)
So you're not you? If you're not you, who are you then?
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 4 years ago, 2 hours later, 16 hours after the original post[^][v]#1,199,095
@1,199,083 (Meta !Sober//iZs)
I'm not the one bringing up the same person over and over in every single thread.
Anonymous F replied with this 4 years ago, 21 minutes later, 16 hours after the original post[^][v]#1,199,101
@previous (A)
Well, your shtick is widely known here, and you're easy to identify.
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 4 years ago, 2 minutes later, 16 hours after the original post[^][v]#1,199,105
@previous (F)
Again, I am talking about bringing up the same person over and over in every thread, even threads that have nothing to do with him. There is an English word that describes such behavior.
Anonymous F replied with this 4 years ago, 2 minutes later, 17 hours after the original post[^][v]#1,199,108
@previous (A)
Why are you talking about yourself in the third person? We know it's you, so stop referring to yourself as him/same person.
Your English word is shtick.
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 4 years ago, 8 minutes later, 17 hours after the original post[^][v]#1,199,113
@previous (F)
The word is "obsession". This thread is not about Matt, but you have now made it ALL about him. That is absurd, and the very definition of both obsession and shtick.
Anonymous F replied with this 4 years ago, 4 minutes later, 17 hours after the original post[^][v]#1,199,118
@previous (A)
Kind of like you just did with your syntax obsession in this thread?
It had nothing to do with syntax, but now you made it all about him.
Anonymous G joined in and replied with this 4 years ago, 1 minute later, 17 hours after the original post[^][v]#1,199,119
@1,199,108 (F)
I think he truly believes that he can fool people if he insists it isn't him. It's very strange, he never fools anyone but he still tries this. He's a very weird guy.
Anonymous F replied with this 4 years ago, 3 minutes later, 17 hours after the original post[^][v]#1,199,121
@previous (G)
I agree. When he dies, they should give his brain to medical doctors so they can examine exactly how stupidity comes about.
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 4 years ago, 28 seconds later, 17 hours after the original post[^][v]#1,199,122
@1,199,118 (F)
only one person in the history of Minichan has focused on "sewer oil" in China, and that is Syntax. You brought it upon, not I.
Dr. Prof. Dokter MD, PHD, DC replied with this 4 years ago, 3 minutes later, 17 hours after the original post[^][v]#1,199,125
"I think you're just another obsessed idiot who thinks everyone is Matt and cannot help making blatant or veiled references to him in every single post, no matter what the post is about."
Cry moar.
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 4 years ago, 9 minutes later, 17 hours after the original post[^][v]#1,199,131
@previous (F)
Literally talk about "Matt" more. I dare you. I defy you.
Anonymous F replied with this 4 years ago, 44 minutes later, 18 hours after the original post[^][v]#1,199,135
@previous (A)
Why would I talk more about you? You're just a waste of the earth's oxygen level.
Toilet Seat !tr.t4dJfuU double-posted this 4 years ago, 3 minutes later, 18 hours after the original post[^][v]#1,199,137
Meta !Sober//iZs replied with this 4 years ago, 45 minutes later, 19 hours after the original post[^][v]#1,199,156
@1,199,095 (A)
Right. But the thing is, you end up posting exactly the kind of threads Matt would post, in exactly the same text voice. Your text voice is so distinctive you might as well just give up posting anon at this point.
Now let's say, for the sake of argument, that you are really not Matt and someone has mistaken you for him. Would the correct response (if you did not want people to think you were Matt) be to dismiss it or post exactly the same whiny faggy "muh obsession" shit Matt would post?
If you want to pretend you are not Matt that's fine but you shit up so many threads with this "you are LITERALLY obsessed with Indy!" shtick. This is your own thread so I guess you can shit it up if you want with more narcissistic attention seeking.
Anyway if I see this back and forth shit again I'm just gonna out you as Matt straight up if it doesn't stop quick. Cry about modabuse if you want I don't give half a fuck.
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 4 years ago, 13 minutes later, 19 hours after the original post[^][v]#1,199,158
@previous (Meta !Sober//iZs)
It is not a schtick. When people post in threads that have nothing to do with Matt, and make them ALL ABOUT MATT, that is obsession. Literally.
The Shticklier !!BQDwsj6MT replied with this 4 years ago, 15 minutes later, 20 hours after the original post[^][v]#1,199,160