Topic: Wtf is the deal with rolex
Anonymous A started this discussion 3 years ago #106,572 The designs, omg. So generic and uninteresting, do people even know what they do or was Jesus right?
Anonymous B joined in and replied with this 3 years ago , 3 minutes later[^] [v] #1,197,761 I'm not Jesus, Jesus doesn't care.
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 3 years ago , 6 minutes later, 9 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,197,762 @previous (B)
Why would he care that you aren't jesus
shelly joined in and replied with this 3 years ago , 4 minutes later, 14 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,197,763 they know not
Anonymous B replied with this 3 years ago , 1 minute later, 15 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,197,764 @1,197,762 (A)
He doesn't car about us. Thanks.
Anonymous D joined in and replied with this 3 years ago , 7 minutes later, 22 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,197,765 @1,197,763 (shelly )
I guess we can forgive simpletons.
@previous (B)
Maybe Jesus was having a bad day when you met him. Did you even consider that?
Anonymous E joined in and replied with this 3 years ago , 19 minutes later, 42 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,197,769 The plural is Roleces.
Anonymous B replied with this 3 years ago , 1 minute later, 43 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,197,772 @previous (E)
*Rolæ. Thanks
dw !p9hU6ckyqw joined in and replied with this 3 years ago , 7 seconds later, 43 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,197,773 They're generic because everybody copied their designs
Anonymous E replied with this 3 years ago , 5 minutes later, 48 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,197,775 @1,197,772 (B)
Roleces. Thanks.
Anonymous D replied with this 3 years ago , 41 seconds later, 49 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,197,776 @1,197,773 (dw !p9hU6ckyqw)
Of course they copied the designs. The word got out, people like generic shit. Thus the world was filled with watches that lack design other than some square or something, to represent 6 o clock. Maybe a slightly longer square sometimes. Occasionally a circle maybe.
dw !p9hU6ckyqw replied with this 3 years ago , 4 hours later, 5 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,197,816 @previous (D)
no,rolex came up with a design, it was copied to death and now it's considered generic.
dw !p9hU6ckyqw double-posted this 3 years ago , 3 minutes later, 5 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,197,817 What more could you want from a watch than this
Green !StaYqkzUPc joined in and replied with this 3 years ago , 1 hour later, 7 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,197,833 @previous (dw !p9hU6ckyqw)
Upgrade to Casio
Anonymous H joined in and replied with this 3 years ago , 33 minutes later, 8 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,197,849 There are several time pieces considered as better. Not that I care. A one hundred dollar watch is fine as far as I am concerned.
shelly replied with this 3 years ago , 43 minutes later, 8 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,197,863 @1,197,833 (Green !StaYqkzUPc)
@1,197,817 (dw !p9hU6ckyqw)
yeah a Casio. would rather wear my 20 buck Casio that hasn't died in 15 years
boof joined in and replied with this 3 years ago , 1 hour later, 10 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,197,889 Whew! I sure am glad I got that Rollex instead then
Anonymous B replied with this 3 years ago , 1 minute later, 10 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,197,890 dw !p9hU6ckyqw replied with this 3 years ago , 4 hours later, 14 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,197,915 @1,197,863 (shelly )
Casios are ugly
↕