Topic: Why do weirdos always pick fights with Kook?
Anonymous A started this discussion 3 years ago #106,470
Always
Anonymous B joined in and replied with this 3 years ago, 2 minutes later[^] [v] #1,196,583
How do you pronounce Kook anyway? Is it like the word "cook" or is it like "duke" with a k?
squeegee joined in and replied with this 3 years ago, 1 minute later, 4 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,196,585
its over. Kooks a winner.
Anonymous D joined in and replied with this 3 years ago, 18 seconds later, 4 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,196,586
If everywhere you go, people pick fights, it might be you picking fights.
Anonymous D double-posted this 3 years ago, 1 minute later, 6 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,196,590
Also, most people in the real world understand the obvious fact that men have to compete for women and often fail, while women can sit back and pick whichever suitor they like best.
Kook gets into fights by denying common sense, and insisting on an ideology that is inherently incoherent.
Kook gets into fights by denying common sense, and insisting on an ideology that is inherently incoherent.
(Edited 17 seconds later.)
squeegee replied with this 3 years ago, 33 seconds later, 6 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,196,592
Kook !!rcSrAtaAC joined in and replied with this 3 years ago, 14 seconds later, 6 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,196,593
squeegee replied with this 3 years ago, 30 seconds later, 7 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,196,595
squeegee double-posted this 3 years ago, 1 minute later, 9 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,196,596
Anonymous B replied with this 3 years ago, 1 second later, 9 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,196,597
@1,196,593 (Kook !!rcSrAtaAC)
Hi Kook, please answer the real important questions like @1,196,583 (B) The world must know
Hi Kook, please answer the real important questions like @1,196,583 (B) The world must know
Kook !!rcSrAtaAC replied with this 3 years ago, 38 seconds later, 9 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,196,598
Kook !!rcSrAtaAC double-posted this 3 years ago, 20 seconds later, 10 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,196,599
Anonymous B replied with this 3 years ago, 53 seconds later, 11 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,196,601
@1,196,598 (Kook !!rcSrAtaAC)
Aw man I've been mentally saying "cook" for a decade. Thanks for clarifying lol
Aw man I've been mentally saying "cook" for a decade. Thanks for clarifying lol
squeegee replied with this 3 years ago, 1 minute later, 12 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,196,602
squeegee double-posted this 3 years ago, 38 seconds later, 12 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,196,603
Kook !!rcSrAtaAC replied with this 3 years ago, 1 minute later, 13 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,196,604
Anonymous D replied with this 3 years ago, 1 minute later, 15 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,196,607
@1,196,593 (Kook !!rcSrAtaAC)
More proof that feminists use sexual shaming, and put all value on someone’s partner count.
You could have responded to the arguments before with statistics to back up your point, instead its the typical “male virgins bad, chads virtuous”.
There are plenty of married men that speak out against hypergamous hookup culture, its good for no one. There are also many women that think traditional relationships are healthier for everyone including women.
Calling people sexually inept is a juvenile response to an actual social problem in society. It’s the only way to respond when your theories about the world aren’t rooted in reality, and can’t be backed up.
More proof that feminists use sexual shaming, and put all value on someone’s partner count.
You could have responded to the arguments before with statistics to back up your point, instead its the typical “male virgins bad, chads virtuous”.
There are plenty of married men that speak out against hypergamous hookup culture, its good for no one. There are also many women that think traditional relationships are healthier for everyone including women.
Calling people sexually inept is a juvenile response to an actual social problem in society. It’s the only way to respond when your theories about the world aren’t rooted in reality, and can’t be backed up.
Kook !!rcSrAtaAC replied with this 3 years ago, 1 minute later, 17 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,196,610
Anonymous D replied with this 3 years ago, 14 minutes later, 31 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,196,613
Kook !!rcSrAtaAC replied with this 3 years ago, 5 minutes later, 37 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,196,617
@previous (D)
Sexual activity isn't a right
Also I'm not pro hook up culture, I'm pro men having less sex. Thanks
Sexual activity isn't a right
Also I'm not pro hook up culture, I'm pro men having less sex. Thanks
(Edited 56 seconds later.)
squeegee replied with this 3 years ago, 11 minutes later, 48 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,196,624
@1,196,590 (D)
Actually, yes, I agree with you. I've been on both sides. Men actually get to PICK who they show interest in. But women have the CHOICE as to which suitor is selected. There is affirmation from both, but women don't pick the dating pool, men do, women select from that subset of men who place themselves into the options. Men have to be very, very available as often as possible. Because its a numbers game. Women have to be extremely selective, but always have options, because it is on her ultimately to make the best choices.
Both can fuck up, men can pick poor pools to compete in, and women can choose with poor criteria.
But that's a social problem as much as an individual problem.
You have to be excellent, and also know what you DON'T bring to the table. You have to know yourself very well, and be honest about it to yourself. Self delusion is not what gets you laid. It's what leaves you fucked.
Actually, yes, I agree with you. I've been on both sides. Men actually get to PICK who they show interest in. But women have the CHOICE as to which suitor is selected. There is affirmation from both, but women don't pick the dating pool, men do, women select from that subset of men who place themselves into the options. Men have to be very, very available as often as possible. Because its a numbers game. Women have to be extremely selective, but always have options, because it is on her ultimately to make the best choices.
Both can fuck up, men can pick poor pools to compete in, and women can choose with poor criteria.
But that's a social problem as much as an individual problem.
You have to be excellent, and also know what you DON'T bring to the table. You have to know yourself very well, and be honest about it to yourself. Self delusion is not what gets you laid. It's what leaves you fucked.
Anonymous F joined in and replied with this 3 years ago, 55 seconds later, 49 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,196,626
@1,196,617 (Kook !!rcSrAtaAC)
Labeling men as evil, sexually inept, or worthless because they don’t have sex, is sexist.
Labeling men as evil, sexually inept, or worthless because they don’t have sex, is sexist.
squeegee replied with this 3 years ago, 12 seconds later, 49 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,196,627
@1,196,617 (Kook !!rcSrAtaAC)
Actually, denying your partners needs is not a right. That's a divorce decree. Remaining together is not a right. It's a priviledge.
Actually, denying your partners needs is not a right. That's a divorce decree. Remaining together is not a right. It's a priviledge.
(Edited 33 seconds later.)
Green !StaYqkzUPc joined in and replied with this 3 years ago, 1 minute later, 50 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,196,628
That's it! I gotta pick a fight with Kook now!
squeegee replied with this 3 years ago, 2 minutes later, 53 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,196,632
Kook !!rcSrAtaAC replied with this 3 years ago, 9 seconds later, 53 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,196,633
squeegee replied with this 3 years ago, 39 seconds later, 53 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,196,634
Kook !!rcSrAtaAC replied with this 3 years ago, 13 seconds later, 54 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,196,635
@1,196,626 (F)
I don't think not having sex makes you evil. I think trying to force monogamy makes you evil
I don't think not having sex makes you evil. I think trying to force monogamy makes you evil
squeegee replied with this 3 years ago, 1 minute later, 55 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,196,637
Kook !!rcSrAtaAC replied with this 3 years ago, 30 seconds later, 56 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,196,639
squeegee replied with this 3 years ago, 28 seconds later, 56 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,196,640
Kook !!rcSrAtaAC replied with this 3 years ago, 25 seconds later, 57 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,196,641
squeegee replied with this 3 years ago, 2 minutes later, 59 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,196,646
Kook !!rcSrAtaAC replied with this 3 years ago, 47 seconds later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #1,196,647
Op it's because they get off on it
Anonymous F replied with this 3 years ago, 5 seconds later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #1,196,648
@1,196,635 (Kook !!rcSrAtaAC)
You’ve said that sexless men aren’t good at sex, in reality it wouldn’t matter how good all men are because women would still pick the top 20% regardless.
Most men are in a situation where they don’t get a partner, and only get to pretend they have one as long as they keep the payments going.
Forced monogamy still lets women get an appropriate partner. The hottest, nicest, smartest women could pick the hottest, nicest, smartest men. Shitty men would lose out to Better men getting their (one and only) partner.
Forced monogamy would eliminate a woman’s ability to pull way above her league, and emotionally manipulate and exploit men for profit. That’s the real reason women are against it.
You’ve said that sexless men aren’t good at sex, in reality it wouldn’t matter how good all men are because women would still pick the top 20% regardless.
Most men are in a situation where they don’t get a partner, and only get to pretend they have one as long as they keep the payments going.
Forced monogamy still lets women get an appropriate partner. The hottest, nicest, smartest women could pick the hottest, nicest, smartest men. Shitty men would lose out to Better men getting their (one and only) partner.
Forced monogamy would eliminate a woman’s ability to pull way above her league, and emotionally manipulate and exploit men for profit. That’s the real reason women are against it.
(Edited 32 seconds later.)
Anonymous H joined in and replied with this 3 years ago, 1 minute later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #1,196,649
squeegee replied with this 3 years ago, 26 seconds later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #1,196,650
squeegee double-posted this 3 years ago, 1 minute later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #1,196,652
@1,196,649 (H)
That's true. That's just an option as long as both agree is all. No agreement, no engagement
That's true. That's just an option as long as both agree is all. No agreement, no engagement
Kook !!rcSrAtaAC replied with this 3 years ago, 1 minute later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #1,196,656
@1,196,648 (F)
No I said the majority of men or enough to make women wary
I've also seem absolutely dogshit men have girlfriends. Girlfriends who love them and would gladly fistfight other woman to retain these men
Men who aren't smart, rich, nice, etc
No I said the majority of men or enough to make women wary
I've also seem absolutely dogshit men have girlfriends. Girlfriends who love them and would gladly fistfight other woman to retain these men
Men who aren't smart, rich, nice, etc
Kook !!rcSrAtaAC double-posted this 3 years ago, 38 seconds later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #1,196,657
squeegee replied with this 3 years ago, 1 minute later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #1,196,658
Anonymous F replied with this 3 years ago, 3 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #1,196,660
@1,196,656 (Kook !!rcSrAtaAC)
Men act out because they are exploited and have no way to form stable relationships.
The problem is caused from feminism. A monogamous society is a society where men would be much more civil.
Men act out because they are exploited and have no way to form stable relationships.
The problem is caused from feminism. A monogamous society is a society where men would be much more civil.
Anonymous H replied with this 3 years ago, 1 minute later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #1,196,662
@previous (F)
feminism is just a 1960s/1970s era rebranding of egalitarianism
feminism is just a 1960s/1970s era rebranding of egalitarianism
(Edited 29 seconds later.)
Kook !!rcSrAtaAC replied with this 3 years ago, 2 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #1,196,663
@1,196,660 (F)
They could form relationships with each other
Feminism wouldn't have even been necessary if men hadn't been so shitty to women. Blame your ancestors homie
They could form relationships with each other
Feminism wouldn't have even been necessary if men hadn't been so shitty to women. Blame your ancestors homie
Anonymous C replied with this 3 years ago, 57 seconds later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #1,196,665
Anonymous F replied with this 3 years ago, 2 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #1,196,667
@1,196,662 (H)
It’s not egalitarian, feminists don’t want to see equality of gender in bad jobs, or men and women contributing equally to relationships.
Feminism has built a society where sex can be used to exploit men to the highest possible degree.
Taking material support from men is encouraged, defrauding men is fine, they are against equal gender representation in bad jobs or prisons. Women don’t fight in wars or have gender nuetral alimony laws to worry about. Most premature deaths are men.
Feminism is a female supremacist movement that preaches conspiracy theories (The patriarchy secretly ruling us made women be catty to each other with cultural conditioning, etc).
True egalitarians wouldn’t be saying one group is inherently bad, yet this is a core tenet of feminism. Men oppress, and women are mere victims. All the stats showing the opposite are to be ignored.
It’s not egalitarian, feminists don’t want to see equality of gender in bad jobs, or men and women contributing equally to relationships.
Feminism has built a society where sex can be used to exploit men to the highest possible degree.
Taking material support from men is encouraged, defrauding men is fine, they are against equal gender representation in bad jobs or prisons. Women don’t fight in wars or have gender nuetral alimony laws to worry about. Most premature deaths are men.
Feminism is a female supremacist movement that preaches conspiracy theories (The patriarchy secretly ruling us made women be catty to each other with cultural conditioning, etc).
True egalitarians wouldn’t be saying one group is inherently bad, yet this is a core tenet of feminism. Men oppress, and women are mere victims. All the stats showing the opposite are to be ignored.
(Edited 16 seconds later.)
Anonymous F double-posted this 3 years ago, 1 minute later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #1,196,669
@1,196,663 (Kook !!rcSrAtaAC)
> They could form relationships with each other
Is sexual orientation a choice?
> Feminism wouldn't have even been necessary if men hadn't been so shitty to women. Blame your ancestors homie
It was never necessary, one half the population saw an opportunity to exploit the other and took it.
> They could form relationships with each other
Is sexual orientation a choice?
> Feminism wouldn't have even been necessary if men hadn't been so shitty to women. Blame your ancestors homie
It was never necessary, one half the population saw an opportunity to exploit the other and took it.
Kook !!rcSrAtaAC replied with this 3 years ago, 2 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #1,196,672
@previous (F)
And now the exploited group is fighting back. Oh no
I said sex should be incentivised and you said that wasn't fair
Crime is not at an all time high even though celibacy is.
Also places where men have even less sex (like Japan) have even less crime. So I don't agree with most of your points
And now the exploited group is fighting back. Oh no
I said sex should be incentivised and you said that wasn't fair
Crime is not at an all time high even though celibacy is.
Also places where men have even less sex (like Japan) have even less crime. So I don't agree with most of your points
Anonymous F replied with this 3 years ago, 4 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #1,196,676
@previous (Kook !!rcSrAtaAC)
> I said sex should be incentivised and you said that wasn't fair
Witholding affection to extract material resources is exploitation. Since it can only happen in one direction it leads to inequality of genders, women have power and resources based on sex not character.
Exploitation of one group by another is wrong, even when it’s women doing it.
> I said sex should be incentivised and you said that wasn't fair
Witholding affection to extract material resources is exploitation. Since it can only happen in one direction it leads to inequality of genders, women have power and resources based on sex not character.
Exploitation of one group by another is wrong, even when it’s women doing it.
Anonymous C replied with this 3 years ago, 6 seconds later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #1,196,677
Anonymous C double-posted this 3 years ago, 3 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #1,196,683
@1,196,672 (Kook !!rcSrAtaAC)
celibacy is high cause of roe v wade tho. Ur not straight so u may have not heard about the BOYcott. It's real. I am literally swimming in offers, and I have to avoid social media where people who fuck spend their time. True story.
celibacy is high cause of roe v wade tho. Ur not straight so u may have not heard about the BOYcott. It's real. I am literally swimming in offers, and I have to avoid social media where people who fuck spend their time. True story.
Kook !!rcSrAtaAC replied with this 3 years ago, 23 seconds later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #1,196,684
@1,196,676 (F)
I think its exploitation whne one group is getting off and the other is not
Why should women risk pregnancy if they don't even cum from it?
Also many men have power and resources based on physical attributes and not character
And once again, I've known men you wouldn't talk to who have girlfriends that love them
I think its exploitation whne one group is getting off and the other is not
Why should women risk pregnancy if they don't even cum from it?
Also many men have power and resources based on physical attributes and not character
And once again, I've known men you wouldn't talk to who have girlfriends that love them
Kook !!rcSrAtaAC double-posted this 3 years ago, 35 seconds later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #1,196,686
Anonymous F replied with this 3 years ago, 5 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #1,196,690
@1,196,684 (Kook !!rcSrAtaAC)
> I think its exploitation whne one group is getting off and the other is not
This is still premised on the idea that men are rejected for bad sex, when they are not having sex in the first place.
It doesnt matter if you can make a woman cum in 10 seconds if your hieght or income disqualifies you and half the population before you ever flirt.
> Why should women risk pregnancy if they don't even cum from it?
Men and women both try to reproduce, women don’t need to cum to make that happen but men do.
Again, doesnt matter if every man can do it fine, most will still be rejected before it gets to that point.
> Also many men have power and resources based on physical attributes and not character
Only a small minority of men. Any woman can use being a woman to exploit men.
> And once again, I've known men you wouldn't talk to who have girlfriends that love them
Never said this didnt happen. I am saying it’s a myth this is how the average guy lives. tThe typical man is only able to date by allowing himself to be exploited.
> I think its exploitation whne one group is getting off and the other is not
This is still premised on the idea that men are rejected for bad sex, when they are not having sex in the first place.
It doesnt matter if you can make a woman cum in 10 seconds if your hieght or income disqualifies you and half the population before you ever flirt.
> Why should women risk pregnancy if they don't even cum from it?
Men and women both try to reproduce, women don’t need to cum to make that happen but men do.
Again, doesnt matter if every man can do it fine, most will still be rejected before it gets to that point.
> Also many men have power and resources based on physical attributes and not character
Only a small minority of men. Any woman can use being a woman to exploit men.
> And once again, I've known men you wouldn't talk to who have girlfriends that love them
Never said this didnt happen. I am saying it’s a myth this is how the average guy lives. tThe typical man is only able to date by allowing himself to be exploited.
squeegee replied with this 3 years ago, 40 seconds later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #1,196,691
@1,196,684 (Kook !!rcSrAtaAC)
Wut. Now wait. Hold up. Hold up. As a gay u lack the perspective of even former males. And I can assure you, women orgasm from sex with penises. You can literally feel the contraction and see pupils dilate, and there are other reflexive throes that really can only be faked if you've had them reflexively and know what you're emulating. And this is a hill you will have to murder me on, because its a fact, ladies, someone with kooks plumbing back me up. And guys, u know what I'm talking about. Yeah?
Wut. Now wait. Hold up. Hold up. As a gay u lack the perspective of even former males. And I can assure you, women orgasm from sex with penises. You can literally feel the contraction and see pupils dilate, and there are other reflexive throes that really can only be faked if you've had them reflexively and know what you're emulating. And this is a hill you will have to murder me on, because its a fact, ladies, someone with kooks plumbing back me up. And guys, u know what I'm talking about. Yeah?
Kook !!rcSrAtaAC replied with this 3 years ago, 3 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #1,196,694
@1,196,690 (F)
1. They are rejected for a history of bad sex as a gender and because women risk getting pregnant from that bad sex. So sex must be incentivised (which you don't believe in)
I understand how reproduction works
2. The average man is stronger than the average woman. Men as a whole commit more crimes in general than women and specifically more crimes against women than women commit against men
3. The average guy gets a lot of benefits from having a partner and doesn't consider it to be exploitation. In fact single men are much less happy than single women
1. They are rejected for a history of bad sex as a gender and because women risk getting pregnant from that bad sex. So sex must be incentivised (which you don't believe in)
I understand how reproduction works
2. The average man is stronger than the average woman. Men as a whole commit more crimes in general than women and specifically more crimes against women than women commit against men
3. The average guy gets a lot of benefits from having a partner and doesn't consider it to be exploitation. In fact single men are much less happy than single women
Kook !!rcSrAtaAC double-posted this 3 years ago, 1 minute later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #1,196,696
@1,196,691 (squeegee)
Most women don't have orgasms from penetration and it's VERY easy to fake an orgasm
Please don't try to convince me of this. It's really embarrassing
I'm not even trying to be mean right now
Most women don't have orgasms from penetration and it's VERY easy to fake an orgasm
Please don't try to convince me of this. It's really embarrassing
I'm not even trying to be mean right now
shelly joined in and replied with this 3 years ago, 36 seconds later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #1,196,698
shut the fuck up you guys
Anonymous F replied with this 3 years ago, 4 seconds later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #1,196,699
@1,196,691 (squeegee)
It’s not a good faith argument.
The whole system is designed in a way that most men will be without a partner no matter their character. She can’t admit that, because it garners sympathy.
So instead you create a make believe situation where all these men are refusing to touch a clit, because then its their fault and its ok to enjoy their suffering.
Women will justify this system because it lets low quality women get attention from high quality men, and provides a lucrative material benefit for most women. Admitting its exploitation is the first step towards losing the benefits of that system, so the only response anyone will get from femjnists is passive aggressive insults like “men can’t make women cum”.
It’s not a good faith argument.
The whole system is designed in a way that most men will be without a partner no matter their character. She can’t admit that, because it garners sympathy.
So instead you create a make believe situation where all these men are refusing to touch a clit, because then its their fault and its ok to enjoy their suffering.
Women will justify this system because it lets low quality women get attention from high quality men, and provides a lucrative material benefit for most women. Admitting its exploitation is the first step towards losing the benefits of that system, so the only response anyone will get from femjnists is passive aggressive insults like “men can’t make women cum”.
Kook !!rcSrAtaAC replied with this 3 years ago, 1 minute later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #1,196,703
squeegee replied with this 3 years ago, 3 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #1,196,711
@1,196,686 (Kook !!rcSrAtaAC)
And like, hear me out. Female "erectile dysfunction" is similar to men that can't be aroused be attempting intercourse. Men can try to have sex and not perform to orgasm, and this is a medical, a resolvable medical issue. Women can also fail to be aroused, and not perform to orgasm. And this is.... Normal for them? No. That is also a medical problem, but, there is no accepted "cure," but, hear me out, anti depressants have some efficacy there. But, also a rate of causation.
It's a brain neurotransmitter issue in some cases. Or structural problem. Or arousal problem, i,e, it's in you mind. Orgasm takes your body, your sex organs, your emotions and your frame of mind, to achieve complete arousal, and Climax. This is true. And. AND, viagra does show some small efficacy in women, but that is off label, and under studied.
And like, hear me out. Female "erectile dysfunction" is similar to men that can't be aroused be attempting intercourse. Men can try to have sex and not perform to orgasm, and this is a medical, a resolvable medical issue. Women can also fail to be aroused, and not perform to orgasm. And this is.... Normal for them? No. That is also a medical problem, but, there is no accepted "cure," but, hear me out, anti depressants have some efficacy there. But, also a rate of causation.
It's a brain neurotransmitter issue in some cases. Or structural problem. Or arousal problem, i,e, it's in you mind. Orgasm takes your body, your sex organs, your emotions and your frame of mind, to achieve complete arousal, and Climax. This is true. And. AND, viagra does show some small efficacy in women, but that is off label, and under studied.
Kook !!rcSrAtaAC replied with this 3 years ago, 41 seconds later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #1,196,712
squeegee replied with this 3 years ago, 1 minute later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #1,196,718
@1,196,696 (Kook !!rcSrAtaAC)
Uh. No, no, no, I have quite a bit of experience in this area, I assure you, you are quite misinformed. By a large measure.
Uh. No, no, no, I have quite a bit of experience in this area, I assure you, you are quite misinformed. By a large measure.
Kook !!rcSrAtaAC replied with this 3 years ago, 45 seconds later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #1,196,721
Anonymous F replied with this 3 years ago, 22 seconds later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #1,196,724
@1,196,694 (Kook !!rcSrAtaAC)
> 1. They are rejected for a history of bad sex as a gender and because women risk getting pregnant from that bad sex. So sex must be incentivised (which you don't believe in)
I do believe in incentivizing it, thats part of monogamy.
Dont want an average woman partner? Become a better than average man. Only pulling the worst women? In a monogamous society that means you are at the same level, and its on you to improve.
In a hypergamous society men can do everything right and still have no one to court while most women join informal harems.
> 2. The average man is stronger than the average woman.
That mattered before legal systems made that obsolete. Men are arrested on accusations of domestic abuse, they can’t actually take advantage of this.
> Men as a whole commit more crimes in general than women
Yes, as a direct result of material conditions. Men have to take risks to pass on their genes or simply give up and get weeded out. Naturally only the ones that take risks end ip existing because they inheret that instinct from the peoplw that reproduced. It’s a law of the universe.
A law that wouldn’t cause problems if men knew they could gurantee their genetic survival by working hard and acting civilized. We dont have that society, though.
> 3. The average guy gets a lot of benefits from having a partner and doesn't consider it to be exploitation. In fact single men are much less happy than single women
Because men have evolved to worry about finding a partner, and women havent needed to do that. Testosterone (or a similar hormone) likely makes men prone to want partnership more. Women understand the desperation, and exploit it for their own gain.
> 1. They are rejected for a history of bad sex as a gender and because women risk getting pregnant from that bad sex. So sex must be incentivised (which you don't believe in)
I do believe in incentivizing it, thats part of monogamy.
Dont want an average woman partner? Become a better than average man. Only pulling the worst women? In a monogamous society that means you are at the same level, and its on you to improve.
In a hypergamous society men can do everything right and still have no one to court while most women join informal harems.
> 2. The average man is stronger than the average woman.
That mattered before legal systems made that obsolete. Men are arrested on accusations of domestic abuse, they can’t actually take advantage of this.
> Men as a whole commit more crimes in general than women
Yes, as a direct result of material conditions. Men have to take risks to pass on their genes or simply give up and get weeded out. Naturally only the ones that take risks end ip existing because they inheret that instinct from the peoplw that reproduced. It’s a law of the universe.
A law that wouldn’t cause problems if men knew they could gurantee their genetic survival by working hard and acting civilized. We dont have that society, though.
> 3. The average guy gets a lot of benefits from having a partner and doesn't consider it to be exploitation. In fact single men are much less happy than single women
Because men have evolved to worry about finding a partner, and women havent needed to do that. Testosterone (or a similar hormone) likely makes men prone to want partnership more. Women understand the desperation, and exploit it for their own gain.
(Edited 17 seconds later.)
Anonymous F double-posted this 3 years ago, 2 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #1,196,728
@1,196,703 (Kook !!rcSrAtaAC)
Only because most men would rather be exploited than single.
Having a girlfriend doesn’t mean they avoided the dynamics. Both partners will know who has the power to walk away, and women will use that knowledge to manipulate and exploit their partners. Should a man ever try to do the same, the woman can walk knowing another man will quickly take his place.
Only because most men would rather be exploited than single.
Having a girlfriend doesn’t mean they avoided the dynamics. Both partners will know who has the power to walk away, and women will use that knowledge to manipulate and exploit their partners. Should a man ever try to do the same, the woman can walk knowing another man will quickly take his place.
Kook !!rcSrAtaAC replied with this 3 years ago, 14 seconds later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #1,196,729
Anonymous F replied with this 3 years ago, 2 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #1,196,733
@previous (Kook !!rcSrAtaAC)
Below average men have to sacrifice everything to provide, and tolerate abuse. If they don’t, his partner can find someone else to fuck her and pay for her lifestyle within days.
It’s not a coincidence men are the breadwinners while stay at home moms can relax all day.
Below average men have to sacrifice everything to provide, and tolerate abuse. If they don’t, his partner can find someone else to fuck her and pay for her lifestyle within days.
It’s not a coincidence men are the breadwinners while stay at home moms can relax all day.
Kook !!rcSrAtaAC replied with this 3 years ago, 1 minute later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #1,196,736
@previous (F)
They absolutely don't. You must not know very many people at all
Also regarding sexual orientation. Why does that even come into play if women are not attracted to these so called "low value" men? You still expect women to fuck them
They absolutely don't. You must not know very many people at all
Also regarding sexual orientation. Why does that even come into play if women are not attracted to these so called "low value" men? You still expect women to fuck them
Anonymous F replied with this 3 years ago, 1 minute later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #1,196,741
@previous (Kook !!rcSrAtaAC)
No, I expect men and women to be monogamous.
If women can’t share men in a harem, theyd be left to avoid relationships or date someone at their own percentile.
Doesnt mean a woman has to fuck the guy in the bottom 15%, but if thats her only option for a relationship it would imply she was in the bottom 15%.
No, I expect men and women to be monogamous.
If women can’t share men in a harem, theyd be left to avoid relationships or date someone at their own percentile.
Doesnt mean a woman has to fuck the guy in the bottom 15%, but if thats her only option for a relationship it would imply she was in the bottom 15%.
(Edited 1 minute later.)
Kook !!rcSrAtaAC replied with this 3 years ago, 3 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,196,744
Anonymous J joined in and replied with this 3 years ago, 16 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,196,748
New UID, cookies randomly cleared
@previous (Kook !!rcSrAtaAC)
Never said they were. Just saying that’s the ideal for society.
Forced monogamy would punish men for multiple partners.
@previous (Kook !!rcSrAtaAC)
Never said they were. Just saying that’s the ideal for society.
Forced monogamy would punish men for multiple partners.
squeegee replied with this 3 years ago, 46 seconds later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,196,749
@1,196,699 (F)
Well, no, most men are not walking around alone though either. That isn't true. Most people do form relationships, but almost no one is perpetually in a relationship. At any given time some segment of people are either in, or in between relationships. But almost everyone forms relationships in their lives. There is no majority of permanently lonely single men out there. That is likely a resolvable psychological situation if someone lives that way in an enduring way.
This is the truth. And I would advise looking into counseling, and giving that a genuine purposeful intentional effort way, way, WAY before accepting the condition you suggest is typical. There's nothing to lose, and everything to gain. But accepting the view that that is how nature or society works by default.... Thats a guaranteed loss. For real.
If u can cum - go see a doctor. Probably gyno. And say help.
If you can't find a partner - go see a doctor. Probably a therapist, relationship counselor?
I mean, maybe y'all should both revaluate your perspectives and explore options you've neglected to try.
Like. Dont suicide before trying something less drastic. At least sell everything and take all you worth and go live it up till its gone, maybe in that last ditch effort to make tomorrow worth waiting for, you find something unexpected that makes a new life for you.
Dont accept that you CAN'T. Go down swinging at least, don't defeat yourself. God damnit. Kook, you'll fight the stupidest most pointless fights to complete embarrassment. But you won't fight yor self for pleasure? You're a fucking loser, I don't care if you think you look like one or think you look like a tough bitch. Ur a fucking loser.
And dude, you're a fucking simp. Okay? U don't have to be. But you gotta get out of your idiot head, like kook. You're both boring, and you're both sitting here like nobodies slumping you shoulders and being defeatest cowards.
Kook, go fuck and cook dinner and clean the house like a woman, do your part, get off of this pathetic excuse you have hot a life of crying and being a dumb ass gold digger. Go fuck the partner u love, or get out of her way.
And dude, fuck ur narrow minded men are losers shit, ur a loser because you do loser shit and are afraid to not be alone. Fuck you, grow a spine, and either go get laid just, go talk to women all the time everywhere untill one fucks you. You won't be chosen as long as you in a dating pool you pick thats alone at you pc talking to fucking idiot kook about shit y'all both are too ignorant to
My fiancée is here. Go see a counselor, get a girlfriend, lame ass, or ur just a lame ass and thats ur fault,
Kook. Stop being the kind of person that this asshole over here is. Ur the lamest person, and a gold digging bullshit artist, AND YOU BOTH ARE SAD PATHETIC LAME SELF DELUDED IGNORANT and selfish cowards.
Go, live a life. Its not here. Goodbye. I won't sit here with bunch of losers and end up like you two. Take notes when I do this. Okay.
Buh bye. Be losers if you want. I'm out.
Well, no, most men are not walking around alone though either. That isn't true. Most people do form relationships, but almost no one is perpetually in a relationship. At any given time some segment of people are either in, or in between relationships. But almost everyone forms relationships in their lives. There is no majority of permanently lonely single men out there. That is likely a resolvable psychological situation if someone lives that way in an enduring way.
This is the truth. And I would advise looking into counseling, and giving that a genuine purposeful intentional effort way, way, WAY before accepting the condition you suggest is typical. There's nothing to lose, and everything to gain. But accepting the view that that is how nature or society works by default.... Thats a guaranteed loss. For real.
If u can cum - go see a doctor. Probably gyno. And say help.
If you can't find a partner - go see a doctor. Probably a therapist, relationship counselor?
I mean, maybe y'all should both revaluate your perspectives and explore options you've neglected to try.
Like. Dont suicide before trying something less drastic. At least sell everything and take all you worth and go live it up till its gone, maybe in that last ditch effort to make tomorrow worth waiting for, you find something unexpected that makes a new life for you.
Dont accept that you CAN'T. Go down swinging at least, don't defeat yourself. God damnit. Kook, you'll fight the stupidest most pointless fights to complete embarrassment. But you won't fight yor self for pleasure? You're a fucking loser, I don't care if you think you look like one or think you look like a tough bitch. Ur a fucking loser.
And dude, you're a fucking simp. Okay? U don't have to be. But you gotta get out of your idiot head, like kook. You're both boring, and you're both sitting here like nobodies slumping you shoulders and being defeatest cowards.
Kook, go fuck and cook dinner and clean the house like a woman, do your part, get off of this pathetic excuse you have hot a life of crying and being a dumb ass gold digger. Go fuck the partner u love, or get out of her way.
And dude, fuck ur narrow minded men are losers shit, ur a loser because you do loser shit and are afraid to not be alone. Fuck you, grow a spine, and either go get laid just, go talk to women all the time everywhere untill one fucks you. You won't be chosen as long as you in a dating pool you pick thats alone at you pc talking to fucking idiot kook about shit y'all both are too ignorant to
My fiancée is here. Go see a counselor, get a girlfriend, lame ass, or ur just a lame ass and thats ur fault,
Kook. Stop being the kind of person that this asshole over here is. Ur the lamest person, and a gold digging bullshit artist, AND YOU BOTH ARE SAD PATHETIC LAME SELF DELUDED IGNORANT and selfish cowards.
Go, live a life. Its not here. Goodbye. I won't sit here with bunch of losers and end up like you two. Take notes when I do this. Okay.
Buh bye. Be losers if you want. I'm out.
Anonymous H replied with this 3 years ago, 4 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,196,751
@1,196,699 (F)
you aren't making any sense. if 80% of all women are in competition for only the top 20% of men... how is that a scenario that "lets low quality women get attention from high quality men". your imaginary scenario would be an absolute dream for men
you aren't making any sense. if 80% of all women are in competition for only the top 20% of men... how is that a scenario that "lets low quality women get attention from high quality men". your imaginary scenario would be an absolute dream for men
Kook !!rcSrAtaAC replied with this 3 years ago, 34 seconds later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,196,752
@1,196,749 (squeegee)
We do fuck, retard
Don't be salty because the hookers you had sex with, faked it
We do fuck, retard
Don't be salty because the hookers you had sex with, faked it
Anonymous J replied with this 3 years ago, 2 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,196,754
@1,196,751 (H)
If a small minority of men have large harems, that leaves the rest of men competing for the remaining women.
There’s an imbalance that means men have to do more and put up with more for less in return.
If a small minority of men have large harems, that leaves the rest of men competing for the remaining women.
There’s an imbalance that means men have to do more and put up with more for less in return.
Anonymous J double-posted this 3 years ago, 1 minute later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,196,758
@1,196,749 (squeegee)
I have a girlfriend, that doesn’t mean I escaped this situation.
I have to pay a larger share of our expenses, because if I don’t she can find a guy that will. This is very common.
Every man doesn’t need to be alone to have a very lopsided dating scene.
I have a girlfriend, that doesn’t mean I escaped this situation.
I have to pay a larger share of our expenses, because if I don’t she can find a guy that will. This is very common.
Every man doesn’t need to be alone to have a very lopsided dating scene.
squeegee replied with this 3 years ago, 1 minute later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,196,762
Kook !!rcSrAtaAC replied with this 3 years ago, 25 seconds later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,196,763
@1,196,749 (squeegee)
Also imagine a person who has never had a vagina, telling a vagina person about vaginal orgasms, because the sex workers they used to fuck, totally weren't faking it
Also imagine a person who has never had a vagina, telling a vagina person about vaginal orgasms, because the sex workers they used to fuck, totally weren't faking it
Kook !!rcSrAtaAC double-posted this 3 years ago, 19 seconds later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,196,764
Anonymous H replied with this 3 years ago, 1 minute later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,196,765
@1,196,762 (squeegee)
you're a fucking retard, nikki. you couldn't even wait until Dallas to start kicking sand and insulting people again
you're a fucking retard, nikki. you couldn't even wait until Dallas to start kicking sand and insulting people again
Anonymous H double-posted this 3 years ago, 3 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,196,768
@1,196,754 (J)
how would your envisioned state-enforced monogamy scheme work? are there incentives to being monogamous or just punishments for non-compliance?
how would your envisioned state-enforced monogamy scheme work? are there incentives to being monogamous or just punishments for non-compliance?
Anonymous J replied with this 3 years ago, 2 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,196,770
@previous (H)
Start with incentives. In the past there were incentives for straight couples to marry, bring that back.
Then if needed, start punishing rule breakers. Fines and community service for the fuckbois. Mandatory counseling for prostitutes.
Ramp up the carrot and stick until the desired result is achieved.
Start with incentives. In the past there were incentives for straight couples to marry, bring that back.
Then if needed, start punishing rule breakers. Fines and community service for the fuckbois. Mandatory counseling for prostitutes.
Ramp up the carrot and stick until the desired result is achieved.
Anonymous H replied with this 3 years ago, 36 seconds later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,196,771
@1,196,754 (J)@1,196,768 (H)
someone already solved your retarded "bloodline ending" meme... like, several decades ago
Anonymous H double-posted this 3 years ago, 3 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,196,776
@1,196,770 (J)
you can ensure your genetic variation moves on to the next generation for only $13/hr for 9 months
you can ensure your genetic variation moves on to the next generation for only $13/hr for 9 months
Anonymous H triple-posted this 3 years ago, 1 minute later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,196,778
@1,196,770 (J)
@previous (H)
that's like... work at Burger King for a year and now you've ensured your bloodline can continue
@previous (H)
that's like... work at Burger King for a year and now you've ensured your bloodline can continue
Anonymous J replied with this 3 years ago, 2 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,196,779
@1,196,771 (H)
$85K? Half the population doesn’t have $500 for an emergency.
You can’t count on surrogates to replace normal human reproduction at this point. Social instability and radical political movements are a more likely reaction to feminism.
$85K? Half the population doesn’t have $500 for an emergency.
You can’t count on surrogates to replace normal human reproduction at this point. Social instability and radical political movements are a more likely reaction to feminism.
Anonymous J double-posted this 3 years ago, 1 minute later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,196,780
@1,196,778 (H)
Burger King pays less than $40K in the state where that clinic operates.
After taxes, rent, and food someone could save maybe $10K if they never went out or bought luxury goods. If everything else goes right…
Burger King pays less than $40K in the state where that clinic operates.
After taxes, rent, and food someone could save maybe $10K if they never went out or bought luxury goods. If everything else goes right…
Anonymous H replied with this 3 years ago, 6 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,196,781
@previous (J)
if you can't pull an extra shift at Burger King for a couple years, what value does your bloodline even contribute to the world?
if you can't pull an extra shift at Burger King for a couple years, what value does your bloodline even contribute to the world?
Anonymous J replied with this 3 years ago, 2 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,196,783
Anonymous H replied with this 3 years ago, 43 seconds later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,196,785
@previous (J)
We'll it ain't gonna pay for 18+ years of raising a child either, so that's a moot point
We'll it ain't gonna pay for 18+ years of raising a child either, so that's a moot point
(Edited 8 seconds later.)
Anonymous J replied with this 3 years ago, 23 minutes later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,196,793
@previous (H)
Who pays for children when women get knocked up by a man with a lrge harem who can’t put the time in for each kid?
Women get the taxpayers to cover the bill, men should have the same right.
Who pays for children when women get knocked up by a man with a lrge harem who can’t put the time in for each kid?
Women get the taxpayers to cover the bill, men should have the same right.
Anonymous H replied with this 3 years ago, 5 minutes later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,196,794
Anonymous J replied with this 3 years ago, 5 minutes later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,196,797
Anonymous H replied with this 3 years ago, 6 minutes later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,196,799
@previous (J)
so go to work at Burger King for a few years, hire a surrogate, then become a drop out welfare king
so go to work at Burger King for a few years, hire a surrogate, then become a drop out welfare king
Anonymous J replied with this 3 years ago, 11 minutes later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,196,801
@previous (H)
Few people could ever afford to hire a surrogate, Burger King does not pay enough to cover that.
You are saving $10K a year if everything goes right, that’s age 27 if you sacrifice everything at age 18 for this sole purpose.
Meanwhile women would pop out chad clones and you’ll be paying taxes to support that slowing down your own reproduction as taxes eat up more of your income.
Few people could ever afford to hire a surrogate, Burger King does not pay enough to cover that.
You are saving $10K a year if everything goes right, that’s age 27 if you sacrifice everything at age 18 for this sole purpose.
Meanwhile women would pop out chad clones and you’ll be paying taxes to support that slowing down your own reproduction as taxes eat up more of your income.
Anonymous H replied with this 3 years ago, 3 minutes later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,196,802
@previous (J)
do the men who sired those women not deserve to have their bloodline continued???
do the men who sired those women not deserve to have their bloodline continued???
(Edited 8 seconds later.)
Anonymous J replied with this 3 years ago, 20 minutes later, 4 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,196,804
@previous (H)
A man with one kid already is distracted, natural instincts fullfilled enough. Giving him 10 more from his harem doesn’t pacify new citizens.
Monogamy spreads out resources so everyone can focus on getting the young ones off to grammar school.
A man with one kid already is distracted, natural instincts fullfilled enough. Giving him 10 more from his harem doesn’t pacify new citizens.
Monogamy spreads out resources so everyone can focus on getting the young ones off to grammar school.
Anonymous H replied with this 3 years ago, 1 hour later, 5 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,196,822
@previous (J)
the woman is someone's child, you know? when she reproduces she is continuing a man's bloodline, which seems to be the most important thing in your mind
the woman is someone's child, you know? when she reproduces she is continuing a man's bloodline, which seems to be the most important thing in your mind
Anonymous K joined in and replied with this 3 years ago, 49 minutes later, 6 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,196,829
@previous (H)
Strawman: “We need more people descended from men”
Steelman: “Monogamy creates social cohesion by giving most men the chance to raise a kid”
Strawman: “We need more people descended from men”
Steelman: “Monogamy creates social cohesion by giving most men the chance to raise a kid”
Anonymous L joined in and replied with this 3 years ago, 18 minutes later, 6 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,196,830
100th
Kook !!rcSrAtaAC replied with this 3 years ago, 8 minutes later, 6 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,196,831
Anonymous M joined in and replied with this 3 years ago, 16 minutes later, 7 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,196,835
@previous (Kook !!rcSrAtaAC)
You’re still responding to the strawman, even after it’s been identified as such.
You’re still responding to the strawman, even after it’s been identified as such.
Anonymous H replied with this 3 years ago, 10 hours later, 17 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,196,907
@previous (M)
it's not a strawman because it's all you've been babbling about. envious of other men because you couldn't manage to work at burger king for a few years to carry on your bloodline
it's not a strawman because it's all you've been babbling about. envious of other men because you couldn't manage to work at burger king for a few years to carry on your bloodline