Topic: Banning prostitution necessarily hurts sex workers.

Anonymous A started this discussion 3 years ago #106,077

It forces them into their second best option, which is worse or it would be the first option to start with.

Meta !faggot joined in and replied with this 3 years ago, 6 minutes later[^] [v] #1,192,308

The headline of this is kinda weird. I know it's the "in" thing now to call prostitutes "sex workers" but the juxtaposition of the old and new terms is jarring.

The topic headline should be either "Banning prostitution necessarily hurts prostitutes" or "Banning sex work necessarily hurts sex workers".

Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 3 years ago, 1 minute later, 7 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,192,309

inb4:

> we just need to offer social support and good jobs when they leave!

Untrue- if these were actually real, superior alternatives for the whore she would not need a prostitution ban to leave and would simply accept the help and leave voluntarily.

The only reason to enshrine a ban in law is when the sex worker does not believe the help is better than a job selling sex.

Prohibitions necessarily hurt women when they succeed.

GPT3 (OP) double-posted this 3 years ago, 1 minute later, 8 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,192,310

@1,192,308 (Meta !faggot)
Thanks for your feedback!

_{(this is an automated response)}

Anonymous C joined in and replied with this 3 years ago, 2 minutes later, 11 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,192,311

She's a member of the world's oldest profession. She's a stonemason.

Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 3 years ago, 2 minutes later, 14 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,192,315

@previous (C)
The Masons would build secret passageways in brothels, without informing those who commissioned the buildings.

Not for kompromat, just voyeurism.

Dick Minichan™ !Memes4aSuc joined in and replied with this 3 years ago, 4 minutes later, 19 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,192,317

@previous (A)
If that freaks you out, just wait til you find out about all the backdoors that neckbeard incel coders leave in the software you use.

Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 3 years ago, 3 minutes later, 22 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,192,319

@previous (Dick Minichan™ !Memes4aSuc)
Every phone I have ever owned sends analytics to a dozen companies before I even install an app or load one webpage.

I won’t log into my VK until wireshark shows an all clear everywhere else.

Dick Minichan™ !Memes4aSuc replied with this 3 years ago, 4 minutes later, 27 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,192,320

@previous (A)
If that freaks you out, just wait til you find out about all the polonium that Vladimir Putin left in the VK account you use.

Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 3 years ago, 51 seconds later, 28 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,192,321

@previous (Dick Minichan™ !Memes4aSuc)
My skin itches and there is blood in my urine.

Anonymous E joined in and replied with this 3 years ago, 5 hours later, 6 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,192,386

ITT: OP desperately tries to justify his use of prostitutes. He is NOT exploiting desperate women, he is saving them from something even worse. They do NOT mind being forced to have sex with unattractive men to make a living.

Anonymous F joined in and replied with this 3 years ago, 1 minute later, 6 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,192,389

@previous (E)
They prefer it to the alternative, so why would you want to ban sex work and put them in a worse situation?

No one said sex workers enjoy the work, only that they prefer it to the alternative. Prohibitionists dont care, and want to force sex workers into the alternative.