Minichan

Topic: Andrew Tate seems like a cunt.

Green !StaYqkzUPc started this discussion 3 years ago #105,947

Thanks.

Anonymous B joined in and replied with this 3 years ago, 26 seconds later[^] [v] #1,190,628

Andrew Taint innit

Dead !Pool..v42s joined in and replied with this 3 years ago, 40 minutes later, 41 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,190,639

You need to drink bottold wotor if you're gonna traffic women

Anonymous B replied with this 3 years ago, 6 minutes later, 47 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,190,641

@previous (Dead !Pool..v42s)
a bo'o o' wo'o

Killer Lettuce🌹 !HonkUK.BIE joined in and replied with this 3 years ago, 13 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #1,190,644

Oh, this is that misogynistic dude who's gone viral on TikTok and such recently. I read an article about him, and it notes that he's basically strong-armed the algorithms into promoting him by commanding his followers to artificially inflate his engagement as much as possible.

I mean, I don't doubt that he's legitimately popular or that disgruntled, sexist men aren't a sizeable demographic, but I'm hoping that the above means that his hype will eventually die down and that his algorithm manipulation won't work forever.

boof joined in and replied with this 3 years ago, 2 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #1,190,646

The Tate Modern

dw !p9hU6ckyqw joined in and replied with this 3 years ago, 1 minute later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #1,190,647

@1,190,644 (Killer Lettuce🌹 !HonkUK.BIE)
> he's basically strong-armed the algorithms

lol

Green !StaYqkzUPc (OP) replied with this 3 years ago, 25 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #1,190,654

@previous (dw !p9hU6ckyqw)
Oh here we go again...

dw !p9hU6ckyqw replied with this 3 years ago, 3 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #1,190,659

@previous (Green !StaYqkzUPc)
Sorry but I cannot take seriously a news outlet that believes creators influence the algorithms

Dead !Pool..v42s replied with this 3 years ago, 30 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,190,682

@previous (dw !p9hU6ckyqw)
Creators can game the algorithm, yes

(Edited 13 seconds later.)

dw !p9hU6ckyqw replied with this 3 years ago, 15 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,190,687

@previous (Dead !Pool..v42s)
lol

Anonymous G joined in and replied with this 3 years ago, 1 hour later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,190,698

The majority of videos on TikTok I have seen are making fun of him so I'm not sure whether the algorithm cares.

Dead !Pool..v42s replied with this 3 years ago, 10 minutes later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,190,702

@previous (G)
The algorithm doesn't care about anything more than engagement.

Anonymous H joined in and replied with this 3 years ago, 7 minutes later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,190,705

Um, no shit, congratulations! You're a completely sane human being.

dw !p9hU6ckyqw replied with this 3 years ago, 4 minutes later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,190,707

@1,190,702 (Dead !Pool..v42s)

So what's to game

Dead !Pool..v42s replied with this 3 years ago, 6 minutes later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,190,710

@previous (dw !p9hU6ckyqw)
Buzzwords, "controversial" takes, and just a bunch of people platforming him on twitch for a while. Most algorithms don't have the ability to judge the content, just the reactions to said content as far as I know.

He did talk to my favorite socialist streamer on some other stream, it was dope

dw !p9hU6ckyqw replied with this 3 years ago, 1 minute later, 4 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,190,711

@previous (Dead !Pool..v42s)
That's not gaming an algorithm thats just making engaging content

Dead !Pool..v42s replied with this 3 years ago, 2 minutes later, 4 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,190,714

@previous (dw !p9hU6ckyqw)
That's just two names for the same situation.

Killer Lettuce🌹 !HonkUK.BIE replied with this 3 years ago, 2 hours later, 6 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,190,751

@1,190,647 (dw !p9hU6ckyqw)
I toss your condescending lol right back at you. Of course content creators can manipulate these things, beyond just making content that people enjoy. Specifically telling your followers to go around spamming your vidoes is a good example of that.

dw !p9hU6ckyqw replied with this 3 years ago, 4 hours later, 10 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,190,771

@previous (Killer Lettuce🌹 !HonkUK.BIE)
My condescending lol is at whatever news outlet that's from.
I mean manipulating an algorithm would require knowledge of what the algorithm promotes, which nobody has. The algorithm is in the power position, not the creator (and definitely not the viewer)

Dead !Pool..v42s replied with this 3 years ago, 8 hours later, 19 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,190,812

@previous (dw !p9hU6ckyqw)
Is observational learning not a thing humans can do? Like, people figure out the TikTok algorithm promotes lighter skin faces, the Facebook algorithm promotes content that gets clicks and reactions, ect

Green !StaYqkzUPc (OP) replied with this 3 years ago, 5 days later, 5 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,191,791

I agree with him on vapes though.

Anonymous I joined in and replied with this 3 years ago, 3 minutes later, 5 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,191,793

@1,190,771 (dw !p9hU6ckyqw)
@1,190,812 (Dead !Pool..v42s)
dw has been a little bit extra retarded lately, pay no mind

dw !p9hU6ckyqw replied with this 3 years ago, 5 minutes later, 5 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,191,794

@previous (I)
> Getting mad cause I said tranny
> Says retard

Green !StaYqkzUPc (OP) replied with this 3 years ago, 30 minutes later, 5 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,191,800

@previous (dw !p9hU6ckyqw)
*transgender
:

Please familiarise yourself with the rules and markup syntax before posting.