Topic: There is no evidence for global warming!
Green !StaYqkzUPc started this discussion 3 years ago #105,405
Please ignore the fact that the UK may exceed temperatures of over 40°C on Monday and Tuesday which is the highest since records began.
Anonymous B joined in and replied with this 3 years ago, 30 minutes later[^] [v] #1,184,953
Fortunately, Donald Trump assured us that it is simply a Chinese hoax.
Dead !Pool..v42s joined in and replied with this 3 years ago, 5 minutes later, 35 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,184,957
Manbearpig is totally real, I'm for cereal right now
Anonymous D joined in and replied with this 3 years ago, 11 hours later, 11 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,185,023
@previous (Dead !Pool..v42s)
GROOOOOOAAAAAAN!
Don't worry, I'm not really manbearpig. It's just me, Al Gore.
Anonymous E joined in and replied with this 3 years ago, 1 hour later, 13 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,185,033
yes, when you are breathing more nootropic elixrs and becoming more culturally nepteoweightant 1a., your maete, 1b. your brain is standbying "work"
lol at people still confusing Becca-grade tranny off-spring scam and ad pauperis small paean foul RAND-a-crag for ", Jackson".
I mean irriquick-'tism in hallucinogenic dogs ripping off at least 2/5ths of the eastern treebaude? Really?
(Edited 5 minutes later.)
Dead !Pool..v42s replied with this 3 years ago, 5 hours later, 19 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,185,045
@1,185,023 (D)
Oh hey, thanks for creating the internet!
Anonymous F joined in and replied with this 3 years ago, 1 hour later, 20 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,185,053
@1,184,953 (B)
> Fortunately, Donald Trump assured us that it is simply a Chinese hoax.
He wasn't wrong.
Anonymous B replied with this 3 years ago, 3 hours later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,185,075
@previous (F)
He was 100% wrong. Thanks.
Anonymous G joined in and replied with this 3 years ago, 13 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,185,076
@previous (B)
> He was 100% wrong. Thanks.
Can you prove this?
Anonymous B replied with this 3 years ago, 18 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,185,078
@previous (G)
I do not have to prove a negative. You claimed the affirmative, that global warming is a Chinese hoax. The burden of proof is on you.
Anonymous H joined in and replied with this 3 years ago, 19 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,185,079
duhhh, whatever happened to that hole in the ozone layer lul
Anonymous D replied with this 3 years ago, 1 minute later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,185,081
@previous (H)
It's been slowly restoring, thanks to the reduction in the emission of CFCs. Thanks.
Anonymous I joined in and replied with this 3 years ago, 9 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,185,082
@1,185,078 (B)
> I do not have to prove a negative.
So you can't in fact prove it. OK thanks, that'll be all.
Anonymous F replied with this 3 years ago, 32 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,185,084
@1,185,078 (B)
You guys have been claiming it for years, so the burden of proof is on you.
↕