Notice: You have been identified as a bot, so no internal UID will be assigned to you. If you are a real person messing with your useragent, you should change it back to something normal.

Minichan

Topic: There is no evidence for global warming!

Green !StaYqkzUPc started this discussion 4 years ago #105,405

Please ignore the fact that the UK may exceed temperatures of over 40°C on Monday and Tuesday which is the highest since records began.
Poll option Votes Percentage Graph
Global warming 3 50%
Global warming is a myth 3 50%

Anonymous B joined in and replied with this 4 years ago, 30 minutes later[^] [v] #1,184,953

Fortunately, Donald Trump assured us that it is simply a Chinese hoax.

Dead !Pool..v42s joined in and replied with this 4 years ago, 5 minutes later, 35 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,184,957

Manbearpig is totally real, I'm for cereal right now

Anonymous D joined in and replied with this 4 years ago, 11 hours later, 11 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,185,023

@previous (Dead !Pool..v42s)

GROOOOOOAAAAAAN!
Don't worry, I'm not really manbearpig. It's just me, Al Gore.

Anonymous E joined in and replied with this 4 years ago, 1 hour later, 13 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,185,033

yes, when you are breathing more nootropic elixrs and becoming more culturally nepteoweightant 1a., your maete, 1b. your brain is standbying "work"


lol at people still confusing Becca-grade tranny off-spring scam and ad pauperis small paean foul RAND-a-crag for ", Jackson".

I mean irriquick-'tism in hallucinogenic dogs ripping off at least 2/5ths of the eastern treebaude? Really?

(Edited 5 minutes later.)

Dead !Pool..v42s replied with this 4 years ago, 5 hours later, 19 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,185,045

@1,185,023 (D)
Oh hey, thanks for creating the internet!

Anonymous F joined in and replied with this 4 years ago, 1 hour later, 20 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,185,053

@1,184,953 (B)

> Fortunately, Donald Trump assured us that it is simply a Chinese hoax.

He wasn't wrong.

Anonymous B replied with this 4 years ago, 3 hours later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,185,075

@previous (F)
He was 100% wrong. Thanks.

Anonymous G joined in and replied with this 4 years ago, 13 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,185,076

@previous (B)

> He was 100% wrong. Thanks.

Can you prove this?

Anonymous B replied with this 4 years ago, 18 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,185,078

@previous (G)
I do not have to prove a negative. You claimed the affirmative, that global warming is a Chinese hoax. The burden of proof is on you.

Anonymous H joined in and replied with this 4 years ago, 19 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,185,079

duhhh, whatever happened to that hole in the ozone layer lul

Anonymous D replied with this 4 years ago, 1 minute later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,185,081

@previous (H)

It's been slowly restoring, thanks to the reduction in the emission of CFCs. Thanks.

Anonymous I joined in and replied with this 4 years ago, 9 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,185,082

@1,185,078 (B)

> I do not have to prove a negative.

So you can't in fact prove it. OK thanks, that'll be all.

Anonymous F replied with this 4 years ago, 32 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,185,084

@1,185,078 (B)
You guys have been claiming it for years, so the burden of proof is on you.
:

Please familiarise yourself with the rules and markup syntax before posting.