Minichan

Topic: Republicans will fight tooth and nail for the right for your 10 year old daughter to...

Anonymous A started this discussion 3 years ago #105,373

...be forced to give birth to immigrant rape babies. lol

Anonymous B joined in and replied with this 3 years ago, 1 hour later[^] [v] #1,184,629

@OP
only a fucking liberal could find humor in child rape

Anonymous C joined in and replied with this 3 years ago, 4 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #1,184,630

@previous (B)
Bill Clinton is trying to fly a kite.

Each time he gets it a few feet off the ground it turns and comes crashing back down. Hillary sticks her head out the window and tells him, "You need more tail!"

Bill turned to Hillary and exclaimed, "When I told you that this morning you told me to go fly a kite!"

Erik !AltRitexT6 joined in and replied with this 3 years ago, 2 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #1,184,631

And Democrats will fight tooth and nail to allow those illegal immigrants in to rape 10 year olds.

Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 3 years ago, 1 hour later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,184,633

@previous (Erik !AltRitexT6)
Heads they win, tails you lose.

boof joined in and replied with this 3 years ago, 5 hours later, 8 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,184,645

@1,184,631 (Erik !AltRitexT6)

> And Democrats will fight tooth and nail to allow those illegal immigrants in to rape 10 year olds.

the illegals oddly enough are less likely than home-grown people to commit these crimes. not saying having illegals is a good way to manage things, but if you wanted less such crimes, you would want a higher proportion of illegals compared to homegrowns. maybe even prevent people from being born within the country since they are more likely to get into those high-profile crimes. I'm not advocating anything, just pointing out how isolated instances can make people not see the forest for the trees.

I should also point out that the Democratic Party's policies are not accurately described as fighting tooth and nail etc.

where do you get these inacurate notions

(Edited 3 minutes later.)

Kook !!rcSrAtaAC joined in and replied with this 3 years ago, 2 hours later, 10 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,184,669

@previous (boof)
I think that might depend on which countries illegals

Anonymous G joined in and replied with this 3 years ago, 1 hour later, 11 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,184,685

@1,184,629 (B)

> only a fucking liberal could find humor in child rape

What do you expect from a guy who tried to get a teenage girl to send him pics of her vulva?

Also explains why he's a liberal.

boof replied with this 3 years ago, 19 minutes later, 12 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,184,688

@1,184,669 (Kook !!rcSrAtaAC)
well I don't have such a breakdown so I don't know one way or the other

Kook !!rcSrAtaAC replied with this 3 years ago, 4 minutes later, 12 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,184,690

@previous (boof)
Some countries that let in Muslim immigrants had sharp increases in rapes. They would even try to solve it by giving out bracelets that said "don't touch" in Farsi

Jindy !!XK/nqd1s9 joined in and replied with this 3 years ago, 3 minutes later, 12 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,184,691

@1,184,685 (G)
Who are you talking about? Who do you think is the OP?

Anonymous G replied with this 3 years ago, 1 minute later, 12 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,184,692

@previous (Jindy !!XK/nqd1s9)
Did I say OP? Why are you getting defensive? Do you have a guilty conscience?

Anonymous I joined in and replied with this 3 years ago, 43 minutes later, 13 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,184,696

@1,184,691 (Jindy !!XK/nqd1s9)

> Who are you talking about? Who do you think is the OP?

The op is Bert no thinking about it.

Anonymous H replied with this 3 years ago, 41 seconds later, 13 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,184,698

@1,184,692 (G)
No, but we all know what you mean. You have been saying the same shit for 25 years now.

Anonymous J joined in and replied with this 3 years ago, 15 minutes later, 13 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,184,703

@1,184,691 (Jindy !!XK/nqd1s9)

> Jindy !!XK/nqd1s9

@previous (H)

> Anonymous H

🤔🤔🤔🤔

Anonymous G replied with this 3 years ago, 22 minutes later, 13 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,184,711

@1,184,698 (H)
Please, refreshen my memory... What "same shit" have I been saying for 25 years?

Anonymous J replied with this 3 years ago, 34 minutes later, 14 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,184,716

@previous (G)
Ignore Matt and his projection.

He's upset because he's always called out for stalking an old man in California for 25 years.

boof replied with this 3 years ago, 3 hours later, 17 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,184,739

@1,184,690 (Kook !!rcSrAtaAC)
yes there are some rapey fuckers

Anonymous C replied with this 3 years ago, 6 hours later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,184,760

@previous (boof)
Why was no rape reported so Ohio's own AG would have known about it? That is pretty strange in of itself. You mean, the parents didn't immediately want it reported to the police when they found out about it? Why now? Forget the doctor, because as a parent I would have reported it myself!

Why did the girl have to go to Indiana for the abortion when Ohio does have a provision to handle emergencies such as rape cases? It could have been handled in Ohio no matter what the radical left wants us to believe.

It wasn't just Fox News, because even The Washington Post couldn't find any proof of it. Just one paper which has been known to lie in the past, was claiming they had just one source for their story, while refusing to tell anyone anything else about it. It's pretty damn suspicious!

Just because someone admits to a crime, doesn't necessarily mean they actually committed that crime. Yes, if someone is a radical left hypocrite, then they might choose to believe the story, but a lot of people will confess to crimes for the notoriety. Police put up with it on a regular basis. Police have to sort through the kooks all of the time to find the actual perpetrator.

I had a friend spend 20 years behind bars for a crime he didn't commit. He had signed a confession against his will, but that confession was a lie. I know for a fact that it was a lie, because he was with me the night the crime took place. The judge totally ignored my testimony and convicted my friend based entirely on that confession alone.

I tried to find evidence of the crime online, but it took place back around 1971 and I discovered not all crimes committed prior to the internet can be found online.

Much later we found out the judge's daughter was engaged to be married to one of the arresting detectives, and the judge was helping his son-in-law-to-be by helping him get a promotion via a conviction. The judge should have recused himself for that reason but didn't. My friend's parents finally gave up trying to legally clear his name in the courts and convinced the governor to pardon him with the newest evidence they had. Since he was serving 2 life sentences, he had another 20 years to go before he could be paroled..

Here's my take on it. The left needed a scapegoat and found themselves a Taco (Dr. Jill Biden's description of Hispanics) they could force into signing a false confession for a crime which might never have happened in the first place. I happen to know Democrats have no problem forcing people to lie or sending them up the river for crimes they didn't commit. Pretend I'm from Missouri. I happen to know based on my personal experience that a confession isn't proof of anything, so show me the proof! Show me the proof there was actually a 10 y/o pregnant girl, and show me the DNA proof that the fetus was his! If it is his kid, then the DNA from that fetus should match up with him! That's all I ask, but we both know that is never going to happen.

Sindy !cUseSyY8No replied with this 3 years ago, 6 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,184,761

@previous (C)
> I know for a fact that it was a lie, because he was with me the night the crime took place.

> but it took place back around 1971.

Syntax?

Anonymous K joined in and replied with this 3 years ago, 2 hours later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,184,770

@previous (Sindy !cUseSyY8No)
Who's "Syntax"?

Anonymous L joined in and replied with this 3 years ago, 42 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,184,772

@previous (K)
Whose. Thanks

Anonymous M joined in and replied with this 3 years ago, 3 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,184,774

@previous (L)

Buffalo buffalo Buffalo buffalo buffalo buffalo Buffalo buffalo.

Dead !Pool..v42s joined in and replied with this 3 years ago, 3 hours later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,184,791

@1,184,760 (C)
Columbus police were made aware of the girl's pregnancy through a confidential referral by Franklin County Children Services that was made by her mother on June 22. Columbus Dispatch public safety reporter Bethany Bruner knows how the system works. Each day, the Franklin County Municipal Court Clerk website posts a list of arraignments. On Wednesday it showed "rape of a child under 13." She pulled the file. The victim was 10.

She went to the arraignment. She was the only reporter there when a detective testified under oath that the girl was taken to Indiana for an abortion.

boof replied with this 3 years ago, 54 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,184,805

@1,184,760 (C)

well Jeeeeeepers

(Edited 1 minute later.)

:

Please familiarise yourself with the rules and markup syntax before posting.