
There needs to be an actual subject to discuss first. Thanks.
It is a collapse-eufixation upon a viviancy suffix.
You're thick to think those are
conventionally listed. Even, widespreadly taught enough for their statistic tracking to yet have historical category, or here, at least, to the tectonic plate, I'd vouch. I'unno 'gland may try, as would 'murr'c' (form.).
As a friendly time-traveller and quasi-telepathic, I can inform the first time-tabled trackers for those are given some semi-intelligable allusion even early '30s to mid '30s-odd (13% Scotland, stronger at mid- and lower- English super-scoring and super-scoring like levels; 11% England, strongest at baseline bare AS- or itself like).
I beg my pardon; they had last in the fall of the wall, '87 - '89; 10%, Scotland, strongest the non-informal completer; 18% England, strongest the formal completer, presumably to what those implications invertedly mean)
(Edited 5 minutes later.)
This is like the verbal version of that DALL-E thing. It creates procedurally generated text which is almost sensible but it's stuck in that uncanny valley.
I'm still not sure whether "Autphag" is actually some really sharp programmer with a great sense of humor laughing his ass off as we try to figure out his algorithmically generated word salad like some modern day Voynich manuscript 🤔🤔🤔
@previous (Meta !Sober//iZs)
No, I'm a really low-end mediocre programmer
formerly with a kind-of sharp sense of humour according to some not unwilling to speak against the fog of highly intensely dispersed convention-oriented mis-test imbecility IQ one-offery reputational pressure in historical-officialdom (your usual had-metapolitic/bad-metapolitic schooly) circles, everything is synthetic, I'm a fraud, and I'm almost as automatic as the shreds of microatomnal-dosed 'piates I've been state-'scription reduced to.