Topic: SCOTUS just greatly reduced the fed. gov.'s ability to regulate carbon emissions
Anonymous A started this discussion 3 years ago #105,068
It's like a bunch of fascist buffoons are running things.
Anonymous A (OP) double-posted this 3 years ago, 14 minutes later[^] [v] #1,181,906
Dead !Pool..v42s joined in and replied with this 3 years ago, 43 minutes later, 57 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,181,917
They also ruled that you can't ask for a retrial on basis of poor representation
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 3 years ago, 3 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #1,181,918
Anonymous C joined in and replied with this 3 years ago, 2 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #1,181,919
Imagine getting this hysterical about a harmless invisible gas. 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
Anonymous D joined in and replied with this 3 years ago, 14 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #1,181,924
Nothing's preventing your state from regulating your own emissions. Nothing's preventing you from regulating your own emissions.
Meta !Sober//iZs joined in and replied with this 3 years ago, 34 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #1,181,934
Thank god 😎👌
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 3 years ago, 7 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #1,181,937
lol few of you are old enough to remember when pollution in the US was really bad, like you could not see the next building in LA and the Cleveland, Ohio river caught fire.. The EPA with MANY of its policies has changed that drastically in my lifetime. You will see what happens. It is a shame when people are so blind to history and science.
𝔹𝕝𝕠𝕞 joined in and replied with this 3 years ago, 4 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,181,938
I feel like it might be the opposite of fascism. Isn't fascism all about a strong central government reducing all power to itself?
Anonymous G joined in and replied with this 3 years ago, 2 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,181,939
Your mother greatly reduced the amount she can limit the number of spermbs she can intake last night. 😎😎😎😎😎😎😎😎😎😎😎😎😎😎😎😎😎
Anonymous D replied with this 3 years ago, 30 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,181,948
@1,181,937 (A)
What is preventing the states from doing this? What is preventing California, the state with the most regulations of all, from protecting LA and the environment, as they already are?
What is preventing the states from doing this? What is preventing California, the state with the most regulations of all, from protecting LA and the environment, as they already are?
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 3 years ago, 11 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,181,954
Anonymous D replied with this 3 years ago, 12 minutes later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,181,957
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 3 years ago, 34 seconds later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,181,958
@previous (D)
Yes, and backwards states do not, so the country gets polluted again, and climate change gets worse.
Yes, and backwards states do not, so the country gets polluted again, and climate change gets worse.
Dead !Pool..v42s replied with this 3 years ago, 4 minutes later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,181,964
@1,181,918 (A)
At least when it comes to death penalty cases, I'm not sure if it extends to all cases.
At least when it comes to death penalty cases, I'm not sure if it extends to all cases.
Anonymous D replied with this 3 years ago, 3 minutes later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,181,967
@1,181,958 (A)
Then people can vote with their feet and leave those states. In addition to, you know, actually voting as well.
Then people can vote with their feet and leave those states. In addition to, you know, actually voting as well.
Anonymous D double-posted this 3 years ago, 1 minute later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,181,971
@1,181,958 (A)
I've heard Louisiana is among them. Being the most polluted in the world. Actually, one portion of the state has the highest cancer rates in the country due to oil refining. Everyone making money from oil is criminal. And anyone who's gotten money from oil, inheritance or otherwise, should be in prison.
I've heard Louisiana is among them. Being the most polluted in the world. Actually, one portion of the state has the highest cancer rates in the country due to oil refining. Everyone making money from oil is criminal. And anyone who's gotten money from oil, inheritance or otherwise, should be in prison.
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 3 years ago, 22 minutes later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,182,000
@1,181,967 (D)
No, pollution is everywhere, and people should not HAVE TO leave their state just because their politicians are idiots. Also, many people cannot AFFORD to move.
No, pollution is everywhere, and people should not HAVE TO leave their state just because their politicians are idiots. Also, many people cannot AFFORD to move.
Anonymous D replied with this 3 years ago, 7 minutes later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,182,014
@previous (A)
But what about China? Should we force our environmental regulations on them? Why should we think we know better than them?
Because they are arbitrarily designated as a "country" and not a "state" justifies giving them free reign to destroy the earth?
But what about China? Should we force our environmental regulations on them? Why should we think we know better than them?
Because they are arbitrarily designated as a "country" and not a "state" justifies giving them free reign to destroy the earth?
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 3 years ago, 23 minutes later, 4 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,182,034
@previous (D)
As long as countries have sovereignty, then no, we cannot. What we can do, however, is make sure our country is as non-polluted as we can.
As long as countries have sovereignty, then no, we cannot. What we can do, however, is make sure our country is as non-polluted as we can.
Anonymous H joined in and replied with this 3 years ago, 20 minutes later, 4 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,182,042
Anonymous D replied with this 3 years ago, 3 minutes later, 4 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,182,043
@1,182,034 (A)
Is the distinction between a country and a state not arbitrary? If so, under what grounds are we to respect it?
Is the distinction between a country and a state not arbitrary? If so, under what grounds are we to respect it?
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 3 years ago, 1 minute later, 4 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,182,044
@previous (D)
I did not say we have to respect it, but if we do not, then other countries will use military force to enforce it.
I did not say we have to respect it, but if we do not, then other countries will use military force to enforce it.
Anonymous A (OP) double-posted this 3 years ago, 15 seconds later, 4 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,182,046
Anonymous D replied with this 3 years ago, 13 minutes later, 4 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,182,063
@1,182,044 (A)
Should the Civil War not have happened because the South was willing to use force to enforce their laws?
Should the Civil War not have happened because the South was willing to use force to enforce their laws?
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 3 years ago, 7 minutes later, 4 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,182,073
Anonymous I joined in and replied with this 3 years ago, 1 hour later, 5 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,182,078
Congress has to do its job now, oh no 🙈
Anonymous I double-posted this 3 years ago, 1 minute later, 5 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,182,080
Anonymous J joined in and replied with this 3 years ago, 1 minute later, 5 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,182,082
@1,181,917 (Dead !Pool..v42s)
Whats next? They don’t have to read you your rights during arrest?
This court is making all these rulings in a short time before elections so no one can organize a response. Smh
Whats next? They don’t have to read you your rights during arrest?
This court is making all these rulings in a short time before elections so no one can organize a response. Smh