Minichan

Topic: Does Kook’s Autistic stalker say “I seen”?

Anonymous A started this discussion 3 years ago #105,033

Well? I seen?
Poll option Votes Percentage Graph
4 57%
3 43%

Anonymous B joined in and replied with this 3 years ago, 4 minutes later[^] [v] #1,181,656

Nope. People can mock me. That is no problem. It is the stalking that is the problem. Also, the "things" that people "bring up from the past" never actually happened.

Anonymous C joined in and replied with this 3 years ago, 1 minute later, 5 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,181,657

Bill shot!

Kook !!rcSrAtaAC joined in and replied with this 3 years ago, 1 hour later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #1,181,667

I finally have a stalker. How flattering

Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 3 years ago, 39 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #1,181,668

@previous (Kook !!rcSrAtaAC)
Welcome to the club!!!

boof joined in and replied with this 3 years ago, 1 hour later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,181,688

Phoebe's look-a-like had a stalker, and she felt bad enough for the guy that she said that he can stalk her for awhile instead!

Anonymous F joined in and replied with this 3 years ago, 12 hours later, 16 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,181,741

@1,181,656 (B)

> Nope. People can mock me. That is no problem.

And you cry when people do.

> It is the stalking that is the problem.

Says the guy who stalks syntax, meta, trip, and have on occasion, stalked kook.


> Also, the "things" that people "bring up from the past" never actually happened.

And today, you still say trip is a liar.

Indy (OP) replied with this 3 years ago, 2 minutes later, 16 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,181,742

@previous (F)
You are not talking to me. You are talking to an imposter. Again, stop being so fucking gullible. Mods can confirm this is really Indy.

Anonymous G joined in and replied with this 3 years ago, 4 hours later, 20 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,181,769

@previous (Indy)
Mods can confirm this is not me.

Anonymous H joined in and replied with this 3 years ago, 3 hours later, 23 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,181,793

@OP

> Anonymous A

@1,181,742 (Indy)

> Indy (OP)

!MLHqI35Srs joined in and replied with this 3 years ago, 1 week later, 1 week after the original post[^] [v] #1,183,506

that's fucking all of them; the adjective renders anything nounal indis..

(Edited 33 seconds later.)

shelly joined in and replied with this 3 years ago, 4 hours later, 1 week after the original post[^] [v] #1,183,519

@previous (!MLHqI35Srs)

> that's fucking all of them; the adjective renders anything nounal indis..

Huh

Anonymous K joined in and replied with this 3 years ago, 4 days later, 1 week after the original post[^] [v] #1,184,234

@1,183,506 (!MLHqI35Srs)
if i want a burger, say, how far am i into the b. deguar?

Anonymous K double-posted this 3 years ago, 1 minute later, 1 week after the original post[^] [v] #1,184,235

@1,183,506 (!MLHqI35Srs)
wait, VARSDEN?

what?

!MLHqI35Srs joined in and replied with this 3 years ago, 2 days later, 2 weeks after the original post[^] [v] #1,184,487

@previous (K)
i tended to find that if you waited the same pattern of week above-column-bar to minutely-editorial odd-condition for demonstrasting the edit function works at all sub-moderationatiarially then you're smart enough to at least over-word an observation in the right direction (where "ob-" is a word-root at alll) a subversion; you artfully, whether obvious or not, and indeed high-mistake or so, product of drank no less, depict a McArt d'quinnone project.

Graphs even become useless and too verbally elocuted to constitute hallucinations in the legitimate not to politically form then rather RAND fail-expera for the re-informing of Johnson-Janseen-earacistics if anything when methodically too precise even at the simplest level is detectational the signied need its (the subject/target's) interruption, and letting the i-rangers eat is just sublimely grotesque given their treatment, aggrandization on the bellant and sheer terror in the intra-masturbantiarially "sensitive" proclaimedly:

A rote-comparitor has an in-advance instructive sheet to inform deliverably their eluce elucidation deliberately greivy-circumt psychopathies to auspite post-par that their known trailingly tiring mediocrity or less.

I would then have it that shouting more abstruse abuse, even censored, permits itself on the limited soma an "'epidemic'"-shut, uniformed-privileges masking of "rightful privileges in 'scripty" for psychosexually-augmenting purposes to promote an advanced form of draves dysgeny entirely the promotion of Claire Iriyeot-Marr, etc.

Asperger psychopathies spared the rispart or the collectivization by borsty appear as-if-decadanally overnight as the "concerning inquisitors" of the deserved diagnostic condom, rather. lol Irioyeot civilization then tumbles in ruinously to the plea of a barest-post-borstier as though to remedy the problem reputationally in the clearance of legty themselves not unmarginally more by the sheer pidgeon-chessing force of pecks.

(Edited 16 minutes later.)

Anonymous M joined in and replied with this 3 years ago, 12 hours later, 2 weeks after the original post[^] [v] #1,184,574

@previous (!MLHqI35Srs)
Source?

Anonymous N joined in and replied with this 3 years ago, 10 minutes later, 2 weeks after the original post[^] [v] #1,184,575

@previous (M)
Lmao

Vatt Viller joined in and replied with this 3 years ago, 44 minutes later, 2 weeks after the original post[^] [v] #1,184,588

@1,184,235 (K)

> wait, VARSDEN?

Keep vy favily out of your vouth.
:

Please familiarise yourself with the rules and markup syntax before posting.