Minichan

Topic: Why are many white Americans worried about becoming a minority?

Anonymous A started this discussion 3 years ago #104,876

Is there some problem with how Americans treat minorities?

Anonymous B joined in and replied with this 3 years ago, 2 minutes later[^] [v] #1,179,951

No, there is a problem with how negros treat white people.

Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 3 years ago, 1 minute later, 3 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,179,952

@previous (B)
lol oh, okay

Anonymous B replied with this 3 years ago, 8 minutes later, 11 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,179,953

@previous (A)
You're not a negro, are you?

boof joined in and replied with this 3 years ago, 1 minute later, 13 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,179,954

beacuse there fags

Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 3 years ago, 11 minutes later, 24 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,179,959

@1,179,953 (B)
Only partly.

Anonymous D joined in and replied with this 3 years ago, 8 hours later, 9 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,179,999

did somebody say white people?

Anonymous E joined in and replied with this 3 years ago, 1 day later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,180,351

Yes, minorities are discriminated against across the world.

Therefore I'd like if the border was secure.

Mexico can secure their southern border, that's not controversial.

The anomaly is libs who think America should be the exception. They also think wages need to go up whole we import as many desperate scabs as possible. How does that work?

boof replied with this 3 years ago, 1 hour later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,180,361

@previous (E)
figure it out maniac

Anonymous E replied with this 3 years ago, 18 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,180,363

@previous (boof)
I figured it out. Despite virtue signaling living wages, these people actually enjoy exploiting people whenever they can.

shelly joined in and replied with this 3 years ago, 2 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,180,364

@previous (E)

> I figured it out. Despite virtue signaling living wages, these people actually enjoy exploiting people whenever they can.

living wage is virtue signalling huh

Anonymous G joined in and replied with this 3 years ago, 1 minute later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,180,365

@previous (shelly)
Yes.

Anonymous E replied with this 3 years ago, 6 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,180,366

@1,180,364 (shelly)

Living wages are a great idea.

If you say you support them, but then talk about how we need immigrants to come here because only they will work for $5/hour then clearly it wasn't a genuine statement.

Virtue signalling doesn't mean being virtuous, or expressing compassion. Virtue signalling is when you BS an opinion you know sounds good, and then act the exact opposite way.

boof replied with this 3 years ago, 1 minute later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,180,367

@1,180,363 (E)
it's like you can't imagine what empathy feels like

Anonymous E replied with this 3 years ago, 16 minutes later, 2 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,180,368

@previous (boof)

So is empathy is exploiting immigrants so the boss can keep paying illegal wages and get a new car faster?

What is it called when you feel bad for working people who have no leverage to demand their rights? Must make me a cold psychopath to think that way.

shelly replied with this 3 years ago, 5 minutes later, 2 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,180,370

@1,180,366 (E)
> but then talk about how we need immigrants to come here because only they will work for $5/hour then clearly it wasn't a genuine statement.
lol who said that

Anonymous G replied with this 3 years ago, 4 minutes later, 2 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,180,372

@previous (shelly)
I did.

boof replied with this 3 years ago, 18 minutes later, 2 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,180,373

@1,180,368 (E)

> So is empathy is exploiting immigrants so the boss can keep paying illegal wages and get a new car faster?
>
> What is it called when you feel bad for working people who have no leverage to demand their rights? Must make me a cold psychopath to think that way.

how the fuck is what I understand a "lib" to be going to match your "the boss" character? who am I supposed to hate in your story?

Anonymous E replied with this 3 years ago, 1 hour later, 2 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,180,376

@1,180,370 (shelly)
Liberals have been saying this for decades.

"We need to bring in immigrants because native born won't do these jobs"

It's not true, native born would take these jobs if they paid living wages and had basic safety accommodations.

So instead we import desperate people so businesses don't have to raise wages and treat their employees like people.

Anonymous E double-posted this 3 years ago, 1 minute later, 2 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,180,377

@1,180,373 (boof)

Hate the capitalist exploiting people, and hate the lib who provided the political capital to enable them to do this.

Secure borders would force businesses to raise wages and provide better working conditions.

Anonymous G replied with this 3 years ago, 11 minutes later, 2 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,180,379

@previous (E)
Closed borders, tariffs, and other political impediments create market distortions leading to boom and bust cycles. The solution to low wages (i.e., income inequality) isn't to further sub-divide up the world, doing so only further amplifies the problem.

boof replied with this 3 years ago, 11 minutes later, 2 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,180,380

@1,180,376 (E)

> Liberals have been saying this for decades.
>
> "We need to bring in immigrants because native born won't do these jobs"
>
> It's not true, native born would take these jobs if they paid living wages and had basic safety accommodations.
>
> So instead we import desperate people so businesses don't have to raise wages and treat their employees like people.

you realize that your text here would get you labelled "lib" by many in the media

Anonymous E replied with this 3 years ago, 5 minutes later, 2 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,180,381

@previous (boof)

Criticizing liberals isn't liberalism.

Democratic politicians routinely promote the idea of using immigrants for illegal wages, and mock the right wing for pointing out that this suppresses wages and hurts the middle class.

boof replied with this 3 years ago, 18 minutes later, 2 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,180,384

@previous (E)
I don't care what any label is or is not. What I need is clarity of what you mean by "lib" when it does not seem to match the popular media idea. Perhaps avoid the term and merely state what policies are good and what are not good.

Kook !!rcSrAtaAC joined in and replied with this 3 years ago, 3 hours later, 2 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,180,395

@1,180,376 (E)
I agree completely

shelly replied with this 3 years ago, 4 hours later, 2 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,180,429

@1,180,376 (E)
that doesn't sound like a very liberal narrative to me!

shelly double-posted this 3 years ago, 1 minute later, 2 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,180,431

but yeah who cares what 'liberals have been saying for decades' I'm not a liberal, nobody said that here, you're just setting up a shitty strawman and rolling with it

Anonymous G replied with this 3 years ago, 4 hours later, 2 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,180,489

@1,180,395 (Kook !!rcSrAtaAC)
K

Green !StaYqkzUPc joined in and replied with this 3 years ago, 23 minutes later, 2 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,180,509

@1,180,429 (shelly)
@1,180,431 (shelly)
I owned the libs.

Anonymous G replied with this 3 years ago, 2 minutes later, 2 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,180,510

@1,180,431 (shelly)
ICARE

boof replied with this 3 years ago, 24 minutes later, 2 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,180,513

it used to be, a man could own the blacks
:

Please familiarise yourself with the rules and markup syntax before posting.