Topic: Kook: What do you have against male feminists?

Anonymous A started this discussion 3 years ago #104,849

Hm?

Kook !!rcSrAtaAC joined in and replied with this 3 years ago, 9 minutes later[^] [v] #1,179,734

Because males who advertise that are probably hiding being a pedophile or rapist

Anonymous C joined in and replied with this 3 years ago, 38 minutes later, 47 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,179,737

@previous (Kook !!rcSrAtaAC)
What??? That is insane! LOL Some men really do want equality for women!

Kook !!rcSrAtaAC replied with this 3 years ago, 6 minutes later, 53 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,179,741

@previous (C)
Yes I agree

Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 3 years ago, 13 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #1,179,746

@1,179,734 (Kook !!rcSrAtaAC)
What led you to that conclusion?

(Edited 13 seconds later.)

Kook !!rcSrAtaAC replied with this 3 years ago, 25 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #1,179,753

@previous (A)
Because nearly every time a male has shouted about being a feminist or made that his job/brand, he's been outed as a pedophile or rapist

Case in point, Ezra Miller

shelly joined in and replied with this 3 years ago, 4 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #1,179,760

@previous (Kook !!rcSrAtaAC)
lol

Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 3 years ago, 1 minute later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #1,179,761

@1,179,753 (Kook !!rcSrAtaAC)
Don't know who that is.

What about nu-males? Do you think they are mostly pedophiles or rapists (which or both?)?

Kook !!rcSrAtaAC replied with this 3 years ago, 4 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #1,179,764

@previous (A)
You should look them up

Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 3 years ago, 6 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #1,179,768

@previous (Kook !!rcSrAtaAC)
Looks like a real shithead. I get so confused by the they/them pronouns. Even though I should've saw it coming from your post, I still got tripped up when skimming the wikipedia article. "They", wait, who else was involved? Had to do a double-take. Anyway...

What about nu-males? Do you think they are mostly pedophiles or rapists (which or both?)?

Anonymous A (OP) double-posted this 3 years ago, 2 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #1,179,771

> According to the mother and child, Miller, who was originally visiting a neighbor, showed up to the family's house unexpectedly while wearing a bulletproof vest and brandishing a gun before "pestering" the child by "uncomfortably" touching their hips.
Touching the child's or "their" own hips? Am I the only one who gets confused by this stuff?

Also they are fucking insane and sound like they need to be locked up.

Kook !!rcSrAtaAC replied with this 3 years ago, 6 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #1,179,773

@1,179,768 (A)
What are numales exactly?

Kook !!rcSrAtaAC double-posted this 3 years ago, 45 seconds later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #1,179,775

@1,179,771 (A)
The child's hips

Warner Brothers is also about to release a Flash movie starring them and it's sure to be a clusterfuck

shelly replied with this 3 years ago, 1 minute later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,179,777

@1,179,771 (A)
no it gets confusing in articles like this. especially because the child is also nb
lol

Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 3 years ago, 2 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,179,784

@1,179,773 (Kook !!rcSrAtaAC)
I think you'll know when you see pictures:
https://duckduckgo.com/?q=nu-male&iar=images&iax=images&ia=images
I had to turn safe search from off to strict because otherwise it just shows gay porn lel

> Online, the term is often used as a pejorative in a similar fashion to "beta male," "cuck" or "soy boy", but is typically reserved for white men with facial hair and eyeglasses.

boof joined in and replied with this 3 years ago, 1 hour later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,179,793

facial hair and eyeglasses, heavens

Anonymous F joined in and replied with this 3 years ago, 1 hour later, 5 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,179,809

@1,179,737 (C)
You can be for equality and not use feminism/patriarchy language.

If you're white no one expects you to identify as Blackist.

Anonymous C replied with this 3 years ago, 10 hours later, 16 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,179,855

@previous (F)
What if a male truly believes that a patriarchy has oppressed women? He is then censored from stating that?

Kook !!rcSrAtaAC replied with this 3 years ago, 17 minutes later, 16 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,179,857

@previous (C)
No one is censoring men from calling themselves feminists

Anonymous C replied with this 3 years ago, 20 minutes later, 17 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,179,858

@previous (Kook !!rcSrAtaAC)
But then you just assume they are pedos?

Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 3 years ago, 1 hour later, 18 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,179,867

@1,179,857 (Kook !!rcSrAtaAC)
What about nu-males? Do you think they are mostly pedophiles or rapists (which or both?)?

Kook !!rcSrAtaAC replied with this 3 years ago, 20 minutes later, 18 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,179,874

@previous (A)
They honestly seem like creeps as well. Don't know the phenotype

Kook !!rcSrAtaAC double-posted this 3 years ago, 15 seconds later, 18 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,179,876

@1,179,858 (C)
I'm allowed to notice patterns

Anonymous G joined in and replied with this 3 years ago, 2 minutes later, 18 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,179,877

@previous (Kook !!rcSrAtaAC)
That's what every bigot says.

Kook !!rcSrAtaAC replied with this 3 years ago, 50 minutes later, 19 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,179,878

@previous (G)
I don't care

Anonymous C replied with this 3 years ago, 7 minutes later, 19 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,179,879

@previous (Kook !!rcSrAtaAC)
That's what every bigot also says.

Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 3 years ago, 1 minute later, 19 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,179,880

@1,179,874 (Kook !!rcSrAtaAC)
What about the genotype?

Anonymous G replied with this 3 years ago, 20 minutes later, 20 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,179,886

@1,179,879 (C)
I think it is.

Anonymous F replied with this 3 years ago, 2 minutes later, 20 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,179,888

@1,179,855 (C)
Then he's an idiot.

Women are outperforming men in almost every way.

Even when men seemed to do better, like earning 15% more pay, it was because they sacrificed more for it to meet expectations to be breadwinners.

Anonymous C replied with this 3 years ago, 3 minutes later, 20 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,179,891

@previous (F)
Wrong.

Anonymous F replied with this 3 years ago, 20 minutes later, 20 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,179,895

@previous (C)
I didn't look at it that way before, you've clearly thought about this more, I concede.

Anonymous H joined in and replied with this 3 years ago, 5 minutes later, 20 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,179,896

@1,179,777 (shelly)
What is context?

Minichan