Topic: Should transmascs be forced to register for the draft like cisdudes?
Anonymous A started this discussion 3 years ago #104,711
Cisbros can get arrested and denied federal aid if they don't sign up with selective service.
Is part of transhood taking on the responsibilities that your target gender?
inb4 "why another trans thread"
Is part of transhood taking on the responsibilities that your target gender?
inb4 "why another trans thread"
Anonymous B joined in and replied with this 3 years ago, 11 hours later[^] [v] #1,178,499
come on everyone. this could. be a one hundred. post topic. why was this. bullied? come on. come on. seriously you guys
Anonymous C joined in and replied with this 3 years ago, 25 minutes later, 11 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,178,507
why another trans thread
Kook !!rcSrAtaAC joined in and replied with this 3 years ago, 4 minutes later, 11 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,178,509
I think that the draft should be abolished
Kook !!rcSrAtaAC double-posted this 3 years ago, 12 minutes later, 11 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,178,514
Also they wouldn't even draft you personally. I dare you to go and try to enlist tomorrow and see what happens
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 3 years ago, 2 hours later, 13 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,178,536
@1,178,509 (Kook !!rcSrAtaAC)
Hypothetically, if you were president, and they put a bill on your desk to sign making it the law to draft transmascs, would you sign it?
In this hypothetical, your agenda of abolishing the draft is not popular with Congress and not politically feasible.
You can make the draft include all men, or continue to allow it to exclude transmen thereby denying their gender identity.
What do you do?
Hypothetically, if you were president, and they put a bill on your desk to sign making it the law to draft transmascs, would you sign it?
In this hypothetical, your agenda of abolishing the draft is not popular with Congress and not politically feasible.
You can make the draft include all men, or continue to allow it to exclude transmen thereby denying their gender identity.
What do you do?
Kook !!rcSrAtaAC replied with this 3 years ago, 9 minutes later, 14 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,178,541
@previous (A)
If I absolutely had to have a draft, I'd only allow penis people and also probably wouldn't let trans people be in the army unless it were in roles that were non combat related
If I absolutely had to have a draft, I'd only allow penis people and also probably wouldn't let trans people be in the army unless it were in roles that were non combat related
Kook !!rcSrAtaAC double-posted this 3 years ago, 1 minute later, 14 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,178,543
Also what responsibilities have you taken on?
Anonymous B replied with this 3 years ago, 11 seconds later, 14 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,178,544
what a retarded topic, trannies (TRANNIES!!) are already illegible for service due to their medical condition
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 3 years ago, 13 seconds later, 14 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,178,545
@1,178,541 (Kook !!rcSrAtaAC)
Is that because you want trans folk to kill themselves?
Validating ones gender identity isn't a small formality like holding a door open for a stranger, it's a matter of life and death.
Is that because you want trans folk to kill themselves?
Validating ones gender identity isn't a small formality like holding a door open for a stranger, it's a matter of life and death.
Anonymous B replied with this 3 years ago, 1 minute later, 14 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,178,546
Kook !!rcSrAtaAC replied with this 3 years ago, 48 seconds later, 14 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,178,547
Kook !!rcSrAtaAC double-posted this 3 years ago, 58 seconds later, 14 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,178,548
You literally have no female responsibilities
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 3 years ago, 1 minute later, 14 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,178,550
@1,178,547 (Kook !!rcSrAtaAC)
Catherine got bored of us a long time ago, if you see her everywhere maybe that's because you can't shake your fixation.
Catherine got bored of us a long time ago, if you see her everywhere maybe that's because you can't shake your fixation.
Anonymous B replied with this 3 years ago, 34 seconds later, 14 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,178,552
Kook !!rcSrAtaAC replied with this 3 years ago, 10 seconds later, 14 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,178,553
@1,178,550 (A)
You're obviously her. What female responsibilities do you have? Or any responsibilities at all?
You're obviously her. What female responsibilities do you have? Or any responsibilities at all?
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 3 years ago, 43 seconds later, 14 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,178,554
@1,178,552 (B)
If someone stopped posting here, maybe they have better things to do.
> Everyone is Catherine
If someone stopped posting here, maybe they have better things to do.
> Everyone is Catherine
Anonymous A (OP) double-posted this 3 years ago, 16 seconds later, 14 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,178,555
Anonymous B replied with this 3 years ago, 20 seconds later, 14 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,178,556
Kook !!rcSrAtaAC replied with this 3 years ago, 1 minute later, 14 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,178,557
Kook !!rcSrAtaAC double-posted this 3 years ago, 35 seconds later, 14 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,178,559
What responsibilities do you have? Also why do you crave negative attention?
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 3 years ago, 5 seconds later, 14 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,178,560
Anonymous B replied with this 3 years ago, 41 seconds later, 14 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,178,562
@1,178,557 (Kook !!rcSrAtaAC)
she might really believe it's not her since it's her "mad incel malebrained tulpa"
she might really believe it's not her since it's her "mad incel malebrained tulpa"
Kook !!rcSrAtaAC replied with this 3 years ago, 3 seconds later, 14 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,178,563
Kook !!rcSrAtaAC double-posted this 3 years ago, 22 seconds later, 14 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,178,564
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 3 years ago, 1 minute later, 14 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,178,565
@1,178,557 (Kook !!rcSrAtaAC)
How would you know what devices she has? There are only so many ways to phrase a sentence, it's just a coincidence if we use the same terms.
How would you know what devices she has? There are only so many ways to phrase a sentence, it's just a coincidence if we use the same terms.
Anonymous A (OP) double-posted this 3 years ago, 34 seconds later, 14 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,178,566
@1,178,563 (Kook !!rcSrAtaAC)
Since you don't answer your phone, I'd just be leaving a voicemail.
I'd rather not give you material for your sexual gratification.
Since you don't answer your phone, I'd just be leaving a voicemail.
I'd rather not give you material for your sexual gratification.
Anonymous B replied with this 3 years ago, 22 seconds later, 14 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,178,567
@1,178,565 (A)
it's always been very obvious when you post, especially when you try disguising your text voice
it's always been very obvious when you post, especially when you try disguising your text voice
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 3 years ago, 2 seconds later, 14 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,178,568
@1,178,564 (Kook !!rcSrAtaAC)
Clearly you are admitting you can't tell people apart from this post.
I'm neither. I am I.
Clearly you are admitting you can't tell people apart from this post.
I'm neither. I am I.
(Edited 7 seconds later.)
Kook !!rcSrAtaAC replied with this 3 years ago, 37 seconds later, 14 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,178,569
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 3 years ago, 3 seconds later, 14 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,178,570
@1,178,567 (B)
Oh, what a well reasoned statement!
You know I'm Catherine because I don't sound like here. Brilliant.
Oh, what a well reasoned statement!
You know I'm Catherine because I don't sound like here. Brilliant.
Anonymous B replied with this 3 years ago, 27 seconds later, 14 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,178,571
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 3 years ago, 12 seconds later, 14 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,178,572
@1,178,569 (Kook !!rcSrAtaAC)
Not today, but you don't always answer. I'd rather not argue with someone who can't talk in good faith, thanks.
Not today, but you don't always answer. I'd rather not argue with someone who can't talk in good faith, thanks.
Anonymous B replied with this 3 years ago, 31 seconds later, 14 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,178,573
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 3 years ago, 0 seconds later, 14 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,178,574
@1,178,571 (B)
You just said I disguise my voice. So I don't sound like Catherine so I am. Very logical.
You just said I disguise my voice. So I don't sound like Catherine so I am. Very logical.
Kook !!rcSrAtaAC replied with this 3 years ago, 2 seconds later, 14 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,178,575
Anonymous B replied with this 3 years ago, 19 seconds later, 14 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,178,576
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 3 years ago, 4 seconds later, 14 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,178,577
Kook !!rcSrAtaAC replied with this 3 years ago, 14 seconds later, 14 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,178,578
I have no missed calls at all
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 3 years ago, 3 seconds later, 14 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,178,579
Anonymous B replied with this 3 years ago, 7 seconds later, 14 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,178,580
Anonymous B double-posted this 3 years ago, 16 seconds later, 14 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,178,581
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 3 years ago, 1 minute later, 14 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,178,582
Anonymous B replied with this 3 years ago, 39 seconds later, 14 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,178,583
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 3 years ago, 46 seconds later, 14 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,178,584
Anonymous B replied with this 3 years ago, 59 seconds later, 14 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,178,585
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 3 years ago, 1 minute later, 14 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,178,587
@previous (B)
You're completely wrong, and I've never even heard of this person outside of Kook accusing others of being Catherine.
You're completely wrong, and I've never even heard of this person outside of Kook accusing others of being Catherine.
(Edited 14 seconds later.)
Anonymous B replied with this 3 years ago, 43 seconds later, 14 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,178,589
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 3 years ago, 1 minute later, 14 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,178,592
@previous (B)
Please stop nurse posting, you are the object of my fascination constantly changing disguises.
Please stop nurse posting, you are the object of my fascination constantly changing disguises.