Topic: In the US, while is child molestation, an admittedly horrible crime...
Anonymous A started this discussion 3 years ago #104,633
...seen as worse than even murder or serial killing?
Anonymous B joined in and replied with this 3 years ago, 2 minutes later[^] [v] #1,177,790
You wot?
Anonymous C joined in and replied with this 3 years ago, 39 minutes later, 42 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,177,791
That would be a fair question for a horny college guy in an ethics course.
You're almost 50, pick a new fetish.
You're almost 50, pick a new fetish.
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 3 years ago, 1 minute later, 43 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,177,792
Anonymous D joined in and replied with this 3 years ago, 8 minutes later, 51 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,177,793
breaking news: child molester complains that child molesters have "bad rap" and "aren't as bad as murderers or serial killers"
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 3 years ago, 30 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #1,177,796
Anonymous E joined in and replied with this 3 years ago, 5 hours later, 7 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,177,823
Why are you defending child molesters Matt?
cccuuunnttt !.cATkimmOo joined in and replied with this 3 years ago, 1 hour later, 8 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,177,831
Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU joined in and replied with this 3 years ago, 52 minutes later, 9 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,177,836
Here's some free life advice: If you ever feel the urge to share an idea that begins, "Okay I know child molestation is bad, but...", don't.
(Edited 7 minutes later.)
Dead !Pool..v42s joined in and replied with this 3 years ago, 3 hours later, 13 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,177,858
The fact that you don't understand why it's worse to mess with a child then to kill an adult, shows that you shouldn't be in a relationship probably with anyone
Anonymous I joined in and replied with this 3 years ago, 58 minutes later, 14 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,177,868
> while is child molestation
🥴
🥴
cccuuunnttt !.cATkimmOo replied with this 3 years ago, 1 minute later, 14 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,177,869
@1,177,858 (Dead !Pool..v42s)
> you shouldn't be in a relationship probably with anyone
I don't think you have to worry about that
> you shouldn't be in a relationship probably with anyone
I don't think you have to worry about that
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 3 years ago, 9 minutes later, 14 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,177,873
So, molesting one child is worse than, say, a string of serial murders wherein the perpetrator tortures and murders over 100 adults?
Anonymous E replied with this 3 years ago, 17 minutes later, 14 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,177,876
@previous (A)
Again, why are you defending a known child molester? Do you guys stick together or what?
Again, why are you defending a known child molester? Do you guys stick together or what?
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 3 years ago, 1 minute later, 14 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,177,877
Anonymous E replied with this 3 years ago, 6 minutes later, 15 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,177,879
@previous (A)
You know damn well what I'm talking about. You created this thread to get people off your ass about the Kyle Rittenhouse thread because you defended a known pedophile who was shot and killed. Then you come here and continue to defend child molesters.
So, again, why are you defending a known child molester who was shot and killed?
You know damn well what I'm talking about. You created this thread to get people off your ass about the Kyle Rittenhouse thread because you defended a known pedophile who was shot and killed. Then you come here and continue to defend child molesters.
So, again, why are you defending a known child molester who was shot and killed?
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 3 years ago, 4 minutes later, 15 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,177,880
@previous (E)
lol what the hell are you talking about? Kyle Rittenhouse? Yeah, he's not justified. Nothing to do with children. I am not defending anyone. I asked a simple question. I think you might have schizo-affective disorder or delusions. You have this entire, complex script and story in your head that is not based on reality.
lol what the hell are you talking about? Kyle Rittenhouse? Yeah, he's not justified. Nothing to do with children. I am not defending anyone. I asked a simple question. I think you might have schizo-affective disorder or delusions. You have this entire, complex script and story in your head that is not based on reality.
Kook !!rcSrAtaAC joined in and replied with this 3 years ago, 2 minutes later, 15 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,177,882
Kook !!rcSrAtaAC double-posted this 3 years ago, 32 seconds later, 15 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,177,883
Anonymous E replied with this 3 years ago, 3 minutes later, 15 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,177,884
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 3 years ago, 17 seconds later, 15 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,177,885
Anonymous A (OP) double-posted this 3 years ago, 18 seconds later, 15 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,177,886
Anonymous B replied with this 3 years ago, 1 minute later, 15 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,177,887
Kook !!rcSrAtaAC replied with this 3 years ago, 2 minutes later, 15 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,177,888
Anonymous E replied with this 3 years ago, 1 minute later, 15 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,177,890
@1,177,880 (A)
> Kyle Rittenhouse? Yeah, he's not justified. Nothing to do with children.
He's justified as hell. He saved many other children from the same fate of that child molester.
> I am not defending anyone.
You've been defending child molesters left and right. You think child molesters should walk free rather than face justification for their crime.
I guess you think you should walk free after asking an underage girl for pics of her vulva.
> Kyle Rittenhouse? Yeah, he's not justified. Nothing to do with children.
He's justified as hell. He saved many other children from the same fate of that child molester.
> I am not defending anyone.
You've been defending child molesters left and right. You think child molesters should walk free rather than face justification for their crime.
I guess you think you should walk free after asking an underage girl for pics of her vulva.
Anonymous E double-posted this 3 years ago, 1 minute later, 15 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,177,891
Kook !!rcSrAtaAC replied with this 3 years ago, 2 minutes later, 15 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,177,892
Wait the people who got shot brought it on themselves by trying to attack someone, are you saying that children are more culpable for their abuse?
Anonymous E replied with this 3 years ago, 3 minutes later, 15 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,177,895
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 3 years ago, 3 minutes later, 15 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,177,896
Kook !!rcSrAtaAC replied with this 3 years ago, 56 seconds later, 15 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,177,898
Newsflash retard, some adults by their own actions, deserve to be killed. Children NEVER deserve to be molested
Kook !!rcSrAtaAC double-posted this 3 years ago, 20 seconds later, 15 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,177,900
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 3 years ago, 52 seconds later, 15 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,177,902
@1,177,898 (Kook !!rcSrAtaAC)
Yes, 100% true. What about adults who are good people, but still the victim of a killer?
Yes, 100% true. What about adults who are good people, but still the victim of a killer?
Anonymous A (OP) double-posted this 3 years ago, 20 seconds later, 15 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,177,903
Kook !!rcSrAtaAC replied with this 3 years ago, 10 minutes later, 15 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,177,905
Kook !!rcSrAtaAC double-posted this 3 years ago, 1 minute later, 15 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,177,907
@1,177,902 (A)
It's very unfortunate. But also those murdered people aren't going into society and putting their hurt onto other people. They are not living their entire lives with the memory of what occurred
Also children are considered to be innocents in a way that adults are not
It's very unfortunate. But also those murdered people aren't going into society and putting their hurt onto other people. They are not living their entire lives with the memory of what occurred
Also children are considered to be innocents in a way that adults are not
(Edited 45 seconds later.)
Anonymous B replied with this 3 years ago, 2 minutes later, 15 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,177,908
Ionize OPonce.
Kook !!rcSrAtaAC replied with this 3 years ago, 6 minutes later, 15 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,177,910
Can you understand how children have a level of innocence and non culpability as a class in a way that adults don't as a class?
Like how we also have differing prison sentences and punishment for either group?
Like how we also have differing prison sentences and punishment for either group?
Kook !!rcSrAtaAC double-posted this 3 years ago, 1 minute later, 15 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,177,912
BTW I think its very fucked up that you made this topic in an attempt to feel better about hating Rittenhouse.
You allowed liberal media to sway your mind so completely, that you felt comfortable typing things like this
You allowed liberal media to sway your mind so completely, that you felt comfortable typing things like this
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 3 years ago, 4 minutes later, 16 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,177,916
Anonymous A (OP) double-posted this 3 years ago, 21 seconds later, 16 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,177,917
Anonymous A (OP) triple-posted this 3 years ago, 35 seconds later, 16 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,177,918
@1,177,912 (Kook !!rcSrAtaAC)
I did not make this topic for any reason having anything to do with Rittenhouse. I made it as an objective question.
I did not make this topic for any reason having anything to do with Rittenhouse. I made it as an objective question.
Anonymous E replied with this 3 years ago, 55 seconds later, 16 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,177,919
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 3 years ago, 3 minutes later, 16 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,177,920
Anonymous E replied with this 3 years ago, 13 minutes later, 16 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,177,921
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 3 years ago, 2 minutes later, 16 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,177,923
@previous (E)
No. I am saying that if the justification for their immediate execution is their crimes, then they did not get due process. They did, however, get due process in relation to the Rittenhouse incident.
No. I am saying that if the justification for their immediate execution is their crimes, then they did not get due process. They did, however, get due process in relation to the Rittenhouse incident.
Kook !!rcSrAtaAC replied with this 3 years ago, 6 minutes later, 16 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,177,924
Anonymous E replied with this 3 years ago, 1 hour later, 17 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,177,928
@1,177,923 (A)
So if you break into my house, try to harm me, my wife, or one of my kids with a weapon, and I shoot you in self defense and you die, you didn't get due process?
So if you break into my house, try to harm me, my wife, or one of my kids with a weapon, and I shoot you in self defense and you die, you didn't get due process?
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 3 years ago, 18 minutes later, 18 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,177,930
Kook !!rcSrAtaAC replied with this 3 years ago, 3 minutes later, 18 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,177,932
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 3 years ago, 3 minutes later, 18 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,177,933
@previous (Kook !!rcSrAtaAC)
Someone is suspected to be committing a relatively minor crime, but before the police can arrest him, Tyrone Rittenhouse from Compton shoots him dead.
Someone is suspected to be committing a relatively minor crime, but before the police can arrest him, Tyrone Rittenhouse from Compton shoots him dead.
Kook !!rcSrAtaAC replied with this 3 years ago, 35 minutes later, 18 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,177,938
Anonymous E replied with this 3 years ago, 46 minutes later, 19 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,177,956
@1,177,930 (A)
> It depends the circumstances.
I just gave you the circumstances of the crime.
Now, do I just stand back and watch you beat my kid to death, and let you have your "due process", or do I shoot you dead for trying to beat my kid to death?
There's no "it depends on the circumstances. " I gave you the motive, now how do I deal with it?
> It depends the circumstances.
I just gave you the circumstances of the crime.
Now, do I just stand back and watch you beat my kid to death, and let you have your "due process", or do I shoot you dead for trying to beat my kid to death?
There's no "it depends on the circumstances. " I gave you the motive, now how do I deal with it?
Kook !!rcSrAtaAC replied with this 3 years ago, 2 minutes later, 19 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,177,957
@1,177,923 (A)
Also they weren't executed. That word has specific connotations. People don't get executed in self defense
Also they weren't executed. That word has specific connotations. People don't get executed in self defense
(Edited 37 seconds later.)
Anonymous K joined in and replied with this 3 years ago, 1 minute later, 19 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,177,958
Because it's an abhorrent crime. You destroy the life of a child. They have to live with the shame and emotional damage. The victims of murderers are dead so they can't have their lives ruined.
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 3 years ago, 9 minutes later, 19 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,177,960
Kook !!rcSrAtaAC replied with this 3 years ago, 9 minutes later, 19 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,177,961
Anonymous E replied with this 3 years ago, 10 seconds later, 19 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,177,962
@1,177,960 (A)
> You shoot.
So you're saying, that under no circumstances, I can't kill you by any force necessary, to save my kids life, because you aren't getting your "due process"?
> You shoot.
So you're saying, that under no circumstances, I can't kill you by any force necessary, to save my kids life, because you aren't getting your "due process"?
Meta !Sober//iZs joined in and replied with this 3 years ago, 3 seconds later, 19 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,177,963
@1,177,933 (A)
So if someone tries to commit a violent crime against you, you will just stand there and wait for the prosecutor to prove the state's case to a jury before any action can be taken against the attacker?
So if someone tries to commit a violent crime against you, you will just stand there and wait for the prosecutor to prove the state's case to a jury before any action can be taken against the attacker?
Anonymous E replied with this 3 years ago, 2 minutes later, 20 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,177,964
@1,177,960 (A)
@1,177,962 (E)
Never mind my previous response, I read your answer wrong....
But now, you're changing the tune to saying I can shoot you. What happened to your due process?
@1,177,962 (E)
Never mind my previous response, I read your answer wrong....
But now, you're changing the tune to saying I can shoot you. What happened to your due process?
Meta !Sober//iZs replied with this 3 years ago, 3 minutes later, 20 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,177,965
@1,177,962 (E)
> > You shoot.
>
> So you're saying, that under no circumstances, I can't kill you by any force necessary, to save my kids life, because you aren't getting your "due process"?
This is correct. OP doesn't care about your kids due process. Just that of pedophiles.
> > You shoot.
>
> So you're saying, that under no circumstances, I can't kill you by any force necessary, to save my kids life, because you aren't getting your "due process"?
This is correct. OP doesn't care about your kids due process. Just that of pedophiles.
Anonymous E replied with this 3 years ago, 2 minutes later, 20 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,177,966
@previous (Meta !Sober//iZs)
Oh he proved this when he abandoned his Kyke Rittenhouse thread, and created this one solely for the purpose of protecting pedos.
Oh he proved this when he abandoned his Kyke Rittenhouse thread, and created this one solely for the purpose of protecting pedos.
Meta !Sober//iZs replied with this 3 years ago, 2 minutes later, 20 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,177,967
@previous (E)
Not the first time either. How many tears did he shed for Ashli Babbitt's due process? What happened to ACAB?
Not the first time either. How many tears did he shed for Ashli Babbitt's due process? What happened to ACAB?
Anonymous E replied with this 3 years ago, 3 minutes later, 20 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,177,968
@previous (Meta !Sober//iZs)
He was probably drinking sprite when he read that fucking headline.
I'm sure he was all for it happening because she was a republican. Had it been a democrat or a POC, he would have been all up in arms about it.
He was probably drinking sprite when he read that fucking headline.
I'm sure he was all for it happening because she was a republican. Had it been a democrat or a POC, he would have been all up in arms about it.
Kook !!rcSrAtaAC replied with this 3 years ago, 4 minutes later, 20 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,177,970
@1,177,963 (Meta !Sober//iZs)
Tbf liberal media worked overtime to brainwash people on this incident
Tbf liberal media worked overtime to brainwash people on this incident
Meta !Sober//iZs replied with this 3 years ago, 27 minutes later, 20 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,177,976
@previous (Kook !!rcSrAtaAC)
At this point I wouldn't be surprised if half of America thinks Kyle Rittenhouse shot George Floyd.
At this point I wouldn't be surprised if half of America thinks Kyle Rittenhouse shot George Floyd.
Anonymous I replied with this 3 years ago, 10 minutes later, 20 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,177,979
I have no sympathy for a wannabe hero who gets scammed by two lawyers, is defended by a lawyer who tells him to lay low, then ignores the one good lawyer and gets scammed by another lawyer.
Anonymous E replied with this 3 years ago, 18 minutes later, 21 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,177,983
@1,177,976 (Meta !Sober//iZs)
> At this point I wouldn't be surprised if half of America thinks Kyle Rittenhouse shot George Floyd.
It wasn't him? Then whom killed Georgie?
> At this point I wouldn't be surprised if half of America thinks Kyle Rittenhouse shot George Floyd.
It wasn't him? Then whom killed Georgie?
Anonymous M joined in and replied with this 3 years ago, 2 minutes later, 21 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,177,984
Toilet Seat !tr.t4dJfuU replied with this 3 years ago, 10 hours later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,178,011
Why did OPedo abandon his thread?
Anonymous I replied with this 3 years ago, 1 hour later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,178,022
@1,177,984 (M)
> who?
Kyle Rittenhouse.
Mark Richards is the only good lawyer who represented him. The others (Lin Wood, John Pierce, and Todd McMurtry) exploited him for money.
> who?
Kyle Rittenhouse.
Mark Richards is the only good lawyer who represented him. The others (Lin Wood, John Pierce, and Todd McMurtry) exploited him for money.
Anonymous B replied with this 3 years ago, 1 hour later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,178,039
Kook !!rcSrAtaAC replied with this 3 years ago, 1 hour later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,178,042
Anonymous N joined in and replied with this 3 years ago, 2 hours later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,178,062
Kook !!rcSrAtaAC replied with this 3 years ago, 1 hour later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,178,070
Anonymous I replied with this 3 years ago, 38 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,178,072
Kook !!rcSrAtaAC replied with this 3 years ago, 28 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,178,076
@previous (I)
Wait, I didn't say that I want him to breed and it's weird for you to bring that up.
He's killed a child molester and wife beater before he was 18
What have you done in your life?
Wait, I didn't say that I want him to breed and it's weird for you to bring that up.
He's killed a child molester and wife beater before he was 18
What have you done in your life?
Anonymous I replied with this 3 years ago, 3 hours later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,178,097
Kook !!rcSrAtaAC replied with this 3 years ago, 8 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,178,098
Anonymous I replied with this 3 years ago, 7 hours later, 2 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,178,125
Kook !!rcSrAtaAC replied with this 3 years ago, 3 hours later, 2 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,178,136
Anonymous I replied with this 3 years ago, 2 hours later, 2 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,178,144
Anonymous M replied with this 3 years ago, 5 minutes later, 2 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,178,145
@1,178,125 (I)
do you still beat your wife? haha, you cannot answer in the affirmative nor the negative; for that would imply that you are a domestic abuser, haha!
do you still beat your wife? haha, you cannot answer in the affirmative nor the negative; for that would imply that you are a domestic abuser, haha!
Kook !!rcSrAtaAC replied with this 3 years ago, 2 minutes later, 2 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,178,147
@1,178,144 (I)
You talk about a child molester harming a minor like it's a good thing. Then you talk about said minor breeding. You're disgusting
You talk about a child molester harming a minor like it's a good thing. Then you talk about said minor breeding. You're disgusting
Anonymous O joined in and replied with this 3 years ago, 11 minutes later, 2 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,178,148
Kook !!rcSrAtaAC replied with this 3 years ago, 45 minutes later, 2 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,178,154
Anonymous P joined in and replied with this 3 years ago, 15 hours later, 3 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,178,295
@previous (Kook !!rcSrAtaAC)
Hey Kook: if Bert challenged Trucker to fistfight then turned up with a borrowed firearm, would he have the right to shoot and kill if Trucker made any violent moves?
Hey Kook: if Bert challenged Trucker to fistfight then turned up with a borrowed firearm, would he have the right to shoot and kill if Trucker made any violent moves?
Anonymous Q joined in and replied with this 3 years ago, 16 minutes later, 3 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,178,300
@previous (P)
Yes, but the morality of that killing would be retroactively decided dependent on the trucker's criminal history.
Yes, but the morality of that killing would be retroactively decided dependent on the trucker's criminal history.
Anonymous P replied with this 3 years ago, 6 minutes later, 3 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,178,304
@previous (Q)
Just in case you're unaware, Trucker was a user on Tinychan who Bert challenged to a fistfight in Knoxville. Trucker turned up at the appointed time and space, but Bert slunk off with his tail between his legs.
PS: Bert has a criminal record, and has made numerous rape/death threats on various message boards.
Just in case you're unaware, Trucker was a user on Tinychan who Bert challenged to a fistfight in Knoxville. Trucker turned up at the appointed time and space, but Bert slunk off with his tail between his legs.
PS: Bert has a criminal record, and has made numerous rape/death threats on various message boards.
(Edited 5 minutes later.)
Kook !!rcSrAtaAC replied with this 3 years ago, 6 hours later, 3 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,178,334
Anonymous P replied with this 3 years ago, 16 hours later, 4 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,178,449
@previous (Kook !!rcSrAtaAC)
Do you think Bert could legitimately claim he was acting in self defense? By agreeing to the fight, Trucker was stating intent to cause bodily harm; if he raised a fist after being shown the weapon, surely Bert would have the right to use deadly force under Tennessee's 'Stand Your Ground' law.
Do you think Bert could legitimately claim he was acting in self defense? By agreeing to the fight, Trucker was stating intent to cause bodily harm; if he raised a fist after being shown the weapon, surely Bert would have the right to use deadly force under Tennessee's 'Stand Your Ground' law.
Kook !!rcSrAtaAC replied with this 3 years ago, 7 hours later, 4 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,178,482
Anonymous E replied with this 3 years ago, 2 hours later, 4 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,178,495
@1,178,449 (P)
I'm not a lawyer, so I can't say if I'm right or wrong on this.
If Bert would have shown up to said place and time, knowing that he was about to get into a fight with Trucker, and shot Trucker, he would probably still be charged with murder (or attempted murder).
That being said, the court could argue that "Bert knew that a fight going to happen, and showed up anyway, when he could have stayed home and avoided this entire confrontation."
So my take on this is, if Bert had planned to shoot Trucker, regardless of the outcome, which would make this a premeditated murder.
Also, as a convicted felon, Bert is not allowed to be in possession of a firearm, which would probably make the murder/attempted murder charge stick.
Like I said, I'm not a lawyer, so take it how you will.
I'm not a lawyer, so I can't say if I'm right or wrong on this.
If Bert would have shown up to said place and time, knowing that he was about to get into a fight with Trucker, and shot Trucker, he would probably still be charged with murder (or attempted murder).
That being said, the court could argue that "Bert knew that a fight going to happen, and showed up anyway, when he could have stayed home and avoided this entire confrontation."
So my take on this is, if Bert had planned to shoot Trucker, regardless of the outcome, which would make this a premeditated murder.
Also, as a convicted felon, Bert is not allowed to be in possession of a firearm, which would probably make the murder/attempted murder charge stick.
Like I said, I'm not a lawyer, so take it how you will.
(Edited 1 minute later.)