Minichan

Topic: I want you all to see how psychotic the stalker is

Anonymous A started this discussion 3 years ago #104,623

http://minichan.net/topic/104618

You know where that post was originally made? I made it probably 25 years ago on some PC Modding forum that I do not even remember the name of. I do not even know what my username was was back then. This stalker somehow went to the trouble of finding the forum and my post, then posting it here. He does this regularly. He is truly psychotic.

Meta !Sober//iZs joined in and replied with this 3 years ago, 2 minutes later[^] [v] #1,177,610

So you remember exactly what you posted 25 years ago... but not what the forum was called or your username?

Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 3 years ago, 33 seconds later, 2 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,177,612

@previous (Meta !Sober//iZs)
I recognize the post, yes, because I was modding a computer then, and the whole experience imprinted on my memory. I do not remember every single detail, but I do remember the situation and the post.

Meta !Sober//iZs replied with this 3 years ago, 1 minute later, 3 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,177,617

@previous (A)
Do you think you're the only person who was modifying a computer circa 1997?

Meta !Sober//iZs double-posted this 3 years ago, 4 minutes later, 8 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,177,624

No one else asked how to remove an internal CD/DVD drive in the past 20 odd years? You were the first, last, and only person to ponder this question on the internet in the past quarter century? And you remember every post you ever made, but can't for the life of you remember the forum or username or anything like that?

Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 3 years ago, 30 minutes later, 38 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,177,649

@1,177,617 (Meta !Sober//iZs)
No, but I know it is my post.

Anonymous A (OP) double-posted this 3 years ago, 26 seconds later, 39 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,177,650

@1,177,624 (Meta !Sober//iZs)
Why would he copy and paste the post of a non-Minichanner? Obviously, it is because of me.

Anonymous C joined in and replied with this 3 years ago, 24 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #1,177,657

@1,177,610 (Meta !Sober//iZs)
The caveat here is he was tipsy, so doesn't remember much.

Alcohol and modding aren't a good combo.

Meta !Sober//iZs replied with this 3 years ago, 1 hour later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,177,669

@1,177,650 (A)
Out of all the people who post about modding computers on the internet in the past 25 years, what percentage of them are Minichanners do you think?

Anonymous D joined in and replied with this 3 years ago, 10 hours later, 12 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,177,804

@OP
Haven't you been stalking a man in California for longer than that?

dw !p9hU6ckyqw joined in and replied with this 3 years ago, 40 minutes later, 13 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,177,816

you just unplug the cables though

Anonymous F joined in and replied with this 3 years ago, 3 hours later, 17 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,177,824

@1,177,804 (D)
Nearly half his life. Let that sink in!

Anonymous G joined in and replied with this 3 years ago, 6 hours later, 23 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,177,860

@1,177,657 (C)

> The caveat here is he was tipsy

I see what you did there.

Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 3 years ago, 16 minutes later, 23 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,177,861

@1,177,804 (D)
No.

Anonymous D replied with this 3 years ago, 8 minutes later, 23 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,177,863

@previous (A)
So it's some other spaz in Louisiana who's been stalking an old man in California since the 1990s.

Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 3 years ago, 2 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,177,865

@previous (D)
No one has been "stalking" him. He is the stalker, not his victims. But, you know what? Maybe if you keep saying it for another 25 years, it will come true!

Anonymous D replied with this 3 years ago, 2 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,177,867

@previous (A)

> No one has been "stalking" him.

...except for the one person on this forum who collects pictures of that old man and his family and occasionally imitates the old man's text voice.

Erik !AltRitexT6 joined in and replied with this 3 years ago, 8 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,177,870

Maybe there is a Matt Miller Complete Collection™️ (pronounced as one word) somewhere.

Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 3 years ago, 3 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,177,871

@1,177,867 (D)
No one "collects" anything. And mocking someone is not stalking someone. Stalking has a definite meaning.

Anonymous A (OP) double-posted this 3 years ago, 17 seconds later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,177,872

@1,177,870 (Erik !AltRitexT6)
What would you call someone who actually had a giant file like that?

Anonymous I joined in and replied with this 3 years ago, 23 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,177,878

@1,177,871 (A)

> No one "collects" anything.

But yet, every time you post something syntax related and get called out, you go into a fit of rage and/or abandon your thread.


> And mocking someone is not stalking someone.

But yet, when someone mocks you, or brings up something you posted in the past, your're the one screaming stalker and/or obsessed.


> Stalking has a definite meaning.

And you definitely have an issue with stalking the old guy from California.

Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 3 years ago, 7 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,177,881

@previous (I)
Nope. People can mock me. That is no problem. It is the stalking that is the problem. Also, the "things" that people "bring up from the past" never actually happened.

Anonymous I replied with this 3 years ago, 17 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,177,893

@previous (A)

> Nope. People can mock me. That is no problem.

You sure use that report button a lot.

> It is the stalking that is the problem.

Why is it OK for you to stalk others, but not ok for others to stalk you?

> Also, the "things" that people "bring up from the past" never actually happened.

So everyone here is full of lies?

Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 3 years ago, 6 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,177,897

@previous (I)
How would you know how often I use the report button?

Anonymous A (OP) double-posted this 3 years ago, 28 seconds later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,177,899

@1,177,893 (I)
Everyone here is full of lies? No, just gullible. They believe everything Syntax says, etc. Not dumb, not liars, just extremely gullible for some weird reason.

Anonymous J joined in and replied with this 3 years ago, 7 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,177,904

@previous (A)
Did Syntax write your mother's obituary? Or the article in Time magazine?

Anonymous I replied with this 3 years ago, 4 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,177,906

@1,177,899 (A)

> Everyone here is full of lies? No, just gullible.

This must be upsetting for you.

> They believe everything Syntax says, etc.

So nothing you have ever said has been a lie?

> Not dumb, not liars

You're right, none of us(you excluded) are dumb enough to believe lies you have told.

Anonymous J replied with this 3 years ago, 14 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,177,914

@1,177,904 (J)

> Did Syntax write your mother's obituary? Or the article in Time magazine?

And OP fell silent.

Anonymous I replied with this 3 years ago, 1 minute later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,177,915

@previous (J)
Of course he did. It's normal for him to do so.

Anonymous D replied with this 3 years ago, 21 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,177,922

@1,177,871 (A)

> No one "collects" anything.

...except for the psychotic stalker who collects pictures of an old man in California.

Anonymous K joined in and replied with this 3 years ago, 3 hours later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,177,959

I don't think people are as interested in you as you think they are.

Anonymous L joined in and replied with this 3 years ago, 11 hours later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,178,013

Scottish proto-Bytar suffer an automatic intelligence disease called "if it's simpoh and unroticious vaaegly," falling to the rest of us in simplistic verbal f.o.i.l. which gives us panic attacks for how stilted it comes across, even life-repetitively Purgatariant, deja noir, "bu' seems r'ae'w'll cl'e'er-liek, I was an Orwell typographolooooh-gue automaet."

It's a form of homosexual autism which deeply submerges beneath the typological range of... the middle-classes of several south American semi-elite (ethnological) White tribes, which really has my concern aroused.

It's my fault. I have not been accountable enough to eugenics departments. Non-sense (no, read that inquisitively, with a pause), I've been working fervently to eradicate every single and last one for the first-civilization state fatherland and its advocatory bodies and subsidiary small-scale installate legal bodies to what starvatiant penance of staple and stipy they are permitt4ed operation in order to propel glory for Kim Jeong-il Dongji Chedwosaryeongwan the ideals Juche intellectualism alongside spirited Songun elitism.

To mitigate homosexualizatorializatoriaform this (a personal inclination opposed ideological but in these seasons where the Rason pantalliocrag legally or podemodal function has been switched OFF, to per-vade intellectual humiliation on the European ambassadorial explicit ground when faux foul appears intellectually unconvincing), I'm increasingly barred institutions or they are sabotaged by buy-overs (abortive quasi-exam agencies by soup-kitches an example, etc.).

I feel a sense of indignation even though albeit begrudgingly and in the disproportionate "humility" i.e. humiliation the financial indigny I was represented mischaractericizationationarially absolute retard for daring a (passive, neutral, even hyper-formalistically stilted) plea even that legitimate of the inhumility.

This is some skeg from an old LAN, I'm certain; I never played at these things often (and contrary to myth could just, barely, and maybe at the "only expectancies beyond level is 'bit 'tarded' by statistical defaults"). Increasingly do pseudo-human detritus need a solid visuo-stimulatorily deheuristicized hyper-asphyxeocrisal.

(Edited 3 minutes later.)

!MLHqI35Srs double-posted this 3 years ago, 38 seconds later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,178,014

And yes, having forgotten innocently, as you've guessed.


Still, I re-liver announcement:

IQ spectral bands by ASc. recognized Statistics rewardee Thomson, Sophie commissioned envisaging of intellectualism-subsection Worker Party Initial Civilization life-style in socialistic society up-heave spiritually

Canvassed on a note to a doctor's visit are a series of new post-Guassian distribution i-list segmentations for the post-classing upon post-classing, declassificationaicizatorially, society. This is in an impending republication soon for the announcement of the project to eliminate the pseudo-human, a failure of thought, most of humanity, their devotedness such ideas evidencing autistically Down's-syndromological effect.

(Edited 10 minutes later.)

Anonymous M joined in and replied with this 3 years ago, 1 day later, 3 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,178,223

@1,178,013 (L)
@previous (!MLHqI35Srs)
Illegible gibberish.

Meta !Sober//iZs replied with this 3 years ago, 6 minutes later, 3 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,178,225

@1,177,899 (A)

> Everyone here is full of lies? No, just gullible. They believe everything Syntax says, etc. Not dumb, not liars, just extremely gullible for some weird reason.

Yet you remember word-for-word exactly what you posted on some forum in 1997, yet cannot remember the name of the forum... 🤔

Tell you what: if you can link to the forum post the stalker copied and pasted about your internal CD drive, I will ban him for a month. No questions asked.

This isn't a trick either. If you don't link, I'll do nothing to anyone. If you do link to it, he's banned for a month. You have absolutely nothing to lose either way, and a lot to gain.

Anonymous N joined in and replied with this 3 years ago, 11 minutes later, 3 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,178,226

@previous (Meta !Sober//iZs)
gain??? if nobody emulates his posts for a few days he'll go mad

Anonymous C replied with this 3 years ago, 37 minutes later, 3 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,178,241

@1,178,225 (Meta !Sober//iZs)

> Tell you what: if you can link to the forum post the stalker copied and pasted about your internal CD drive, I will ban him for a month. No questions asked.
>
> This isn't a trick either. If you don't link, I'll do nothing to anyone. If you do link to it, he's banned for a month. You have absolutely nothing to lose either way, and a lot to gain.

You really need the smallest excuse, don't you?

For the record, meta has given me THREE bans for incorrect comma usage.

Anonymous O joined in and replied with this 3 years ago, 2 hours later, 3 days after the original post[^] [v] #1,178,274

@OP
It's a symbiotic relationship, you need each other. The stalker gets entertainment from stalking you, and his stalking gives you what you want most: attention.

Nopaltzin !tPKtSxO9ak joined in and replied with this 3 years ago, 2 weeks later, 2 weeks after the original post[^] [v] #1,181,786

@OP

lol
:

Please familiarise yourself with the rules and markup syntax before posting.