Topic: Man who has sex with bicycle on sex offender registry.
Anonymous A started this discussion 15 years ago #10,458
Killer Lettuce !!iNo3FkiZx joined in and replied with this 15 years ago, 5 minutes later[^] [v] #186,040
> Karl Watkins, an electrician, was jailed for having sex with pavements in Redditch, Worcs, in 1993.
WAT
WAT
Anonymous C joined in and replied with this 15 years ago, 22 seconds later, 5 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #186,041
Can't keep it to the privacy of his own garage. Tsk tsk.
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 15 years ago, 57 seconds later, 6 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #186,042
Leo Vegas !gNoGoD5HzQ joined in and replied with this 15 years ago, 4 minutes later, 11 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #186,043
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/1550613/Goat-survived-by-kid...-and-human-husband.html
I noticed this gem under the article.
I noticed this gem under the article.
Killer Lettuce !!iNo3FkiZx replied with this 15 years ago, 1 minute later, 12 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #186,044
You should protest, OP. The government has no right to target a consensual relationship between a man and his bike! What is this country coming to???
(Edited 29 seconds later.)
Leo Vegas !gNoGoD5HzQ replied with this 15 years ago, 3 minutes later, 15 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #186,046
Anonymous C replied with this 15 years ago, 6 minutes later, 21 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #186,048
bobby2sox !!ztPBX/o0I joined in and replied with this 15 years ago, 25 minutes later, 47 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #186,055
Well, that puts a new angle on the term: "On yer bike"
TrollBuster3000 joined in and replied with this 15 years ago, 6 hours later, 7 hours after the original post[^] [v] #186,400
England is effed
Anonymous G joined in and replied with this 15 years ago, 6 minutes later, 7 hours after the original post[^] [v] #186,403
Sup to4str
jump? joined in and replied with this 15 years ago, 54 minutes later, 8 hours after the original post[^] [v] #186,429
Sounds like he set it up so the cleaners would catch him.
Anonymous I joined in and replied with this 15 years ago, 10 minutes later, 8 hours after the original post[^] [v] #186,441
@186,042 (A)
He wasn't in his bedroom, he was in a hotel room. Did you even read the article, OP?
Anyway, What I want to know is how does one pimp out a bicycle?
He wasn't in his bedroom, he was in a hotel room. Did you even read the article, OP?
Anyway, What I want to know is how does one pimp out a bicycle?
Anonymous J joined in and replied with this 15 years ago, 1 hour later, 10 hours after the original post[^] [v] #186,568
Falco !PZmcClOUDk joined in and replied with this 15 years ago, 2 minutes later, 10 hours after the original post[^] [v] #186,572
LOL! He should just go to jail for being that weird
jump? replied with this 15 years ago, 28 minutes later, 11 hours after the original post[^] [v] #186,601
Falco !PZmcClOUDk replied with this 15 years ago, 1 minute later, 11 hours after the original post[^] [v] #186,604
jump? replied with this 15 years ago, 4 minutes later, 11 hours after the original post[^] [v] #186,611
Anonymous L joined in and replied with this 15 years ago, 2 minutes later, 11 hours after the original post[^] [v] #186,612
Falco !PZmcClOUDk replied with this 15 years ago, 1 minute later, 11 hours after the original post[^] [v] #186,614
jump? replied with this 15 years ago, 1 minute later, 11 hours after the original post[^] [v] #186,618
swamplights !!V3J448+/B joined in and replied with this 15 years ago, 17 hours later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #187,119
That bike was a total slut anyway.
Homestar !RUNNERV7vk (OP) replied with this 15 years ago, 4 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #187,126
TrollBuster3000 replied with this 15 years ago, 3 days later, 4 days after the original post[^] [v] #189,623
So falco isn't just an annoying, pathetic, motherhating fag, he is a statist too?
swamplights !!V3J448+/B replied with this 15 years ago, 18 hours later, 5 days after the original post[^] [v] #189,905
Falco !PZmcClOUDk replied with this 15 years ago, 4 minutes later, 5 days after the original post[^] [v] #189,909
Anonymous L replied with this 15 years ago, 1 minute later, 5 days after the original post[^] [v] #189,910
Falco !PZmcClOUDk replied with this 15 years ago, 59 seconds later, 5 days after the original post[^] [v] #189,911
swamplights !!V3J448+/B replied with this 15 years ago, 3 minutes later, 5 days after the original post[^] [v] #189,913
Falco !PZmcClOUDk replied with this 15 years ago, 1 minute later, 5 days after the original post[^] [v] #189,917
@previous (swamplights !!V3J448+/B)
we're a tolerant fanbase swamplights... tolerance is what we're all about! =^_^=
we're a tolerant fanbase swamplights... tolerance is what we're all about! =^_^=
Anonymous N joined in and replied with this 15 years ago, 2 minutes later, 5 days after the original post[^] [v] #189,918
@186,572 (Falco !PZmcClOUDk)
> make statement nobody agrees with
@189,909 (Falco !PZmcClOUDk)
> imply trolling to save face
lol 0/10 bud, would be disappoint again.
> make statement nobody agrees with
@189,909 (Falco !PZmcClOUDk)
> imply trolling to save face
lol 0/10 bud, would be disappoint again.
Falco !PZmcClOUDk replied with this 15 years ago, 14 minutes later, 5 days after the original post[^] [v] #189,929
Unintentional Jackass !LASXURl1b6 joined in and replied with this 15 years ago, 25 minutes later, 5 days after the original post[^] [v] #189,944
Soon, it will be illegal to masturbate with a glove on.
jump? replied with this 15 years ago, 7 minutes later, 5 days after the original post[^] [v] #189,950
Unintentional Jackass !LASXURl1b6 replied with this 15 years ago, 1 minute later, 5 days after the original post[^] [v] #189,954
@previous (jump?)
It's unfortunate for the furries, though.
If a lady jerked a man off while wearing a glove, is that gang-rape?
It's unfortunate for the furries, though.
If a lady jerked a man off while wearing a glove, is that gang-rape?
(Edited 1 minute later.)
Falco !PZmcClOUDk replied with this 15 years ago, 2 minutes later, 5 days after the original post[^] [v] #189,957
Homestar !RUNNERV7vk (OP) replied with this 15 years ago, 16 minutes later, 5 days after the original post[^] [v] #189,973
jump? replied with this 15 years ago, 1 minute later, 5 days after the original post[^] [v] #189,977
What was he convicted for exactly? If he was in his hotel room, he didn't do anything wrong. If he did it to get caught, then that's the crime.
He wasn't actually arrested for fucking a bicycle, right? It's like using a vibrator.
He wasn't actually arrested for fucking a bicycle, right? It's like using a vibrator.
Unintentional Jackass !LASXURl1b6 replied with this 15 years ago, 14 seconds later, 5 days after the original post[^] [v] #189,978
@189,973 (Homestar !RUNNERV7vk)
Wouldn't have a clue, I was talking more about fursuits, though. Them paws.
Wouldn't have a clue, I was talking more about fursuits, though. Them paws.
cat !COOOOOLbus joined in and replied with this 15 years ago, 15 hours later, 6 days after the original post[^] [v] #190,540
Anonymous L replied with this 15 years ago, 1 hour later, 6 days after the original post[^] [v] #190,580
@189,973 (Homestar !RUNNERV7vk)
Yes. This is why Falco, Fox, and Advi are not allowed within 100 feet of animal shelters or kennels.
Yes. This is why Falco, Fox, and Advi are not allowed within 100 feet of animal shelters or kennels.
vocalon !!dX0knrTu5 joined in and replied with this 15 years ago, 2 minutes later, 6 days after the original post[^] [v] #190,581
Falco !PZmcClOUDk replied with this 15 years ago, 19 minutes later, 6 days after the original post[^] [v] #190,592
@189,973 (Homestar !RUNNERV7vk)
lol no
@previous (vocalon !!dX0knrTu5)
i was just >implying as a joke.
not like, coming out as an actual furry or something.
lol no
@previous (vocalon !!dX0knrTu5)
i was just >implying as a joke.
not like, coming out as an actual furry or something.
vocalon !!dX0knrTu5 replied with this 15 years ago, 15 minutes later, 6 days after the original post[^] [v] #190,599
Anonymous R joined in and replied with this 15 years ago, 2 minutes later, 6 days after the original post[^] [v] #190,603
@190,592 (Falco !PZmcClOUDk)
> not like, coming out as an actual furry or something.
We all know the truth. You don't need to pretend here, Alex.
> not like, coming out as an actual furry or something.
We all know the truth. You don't need to pretend here, Alex.
cat !COOOOOLbus replied with this 15 years ago, 2 minutes later, 6 days after the original post[^] [v] #190,609
Falco !PZmcClOUDk replied with this 15 years ago, 6 minutes later, 6 days after the original post[^] [v] #190,625
@190,599 (vocalon !!dX0knrTu5)
@190,603 (R)
Let's clear some things up.
In a de facto sense, if you judge by some people's standards, then yes I am indeed a furry. However, being a furry is actually a choice and I choose not to really be one mainly because:
A: I dislike the fandom, and what the people within it are like in real life.
B: The circlejerking, and letting ANYONE in the fandom.
C: Calling yourself one puts a lot of unnecessary baggage onto you (professionally and socially) and it's not worth explaining every time someone asks. I've already been through that and it's really fucking awkward.
D: Lotsa drama and shitty art.
There's probably more I'm forgetting.
That said, I'm not ready to assimilate with the furry fandom and don't plan on doing so in the near future.
@190,603 (R)
Let's clear some things up.
In a de facto sense, if you judge by some people's standards, then yes I am indeed a furry. However, being a furry is actually a choice and I choose not to really be one mainly because:
A: I dislike the fandom, and what the people within it are like in real life.
B: The circlejerking, and letting ANYONE in the fandom.
C: Calling yourself one puts a lot of unnecessary baggage onto you (professionally and socially) and it's not worth explaining every time someone asks. I've already been through that and it's really fucking awkward.
D: Lotsa drama and shitty art.
There's probably more I'm forgetting.
That said, I'm not ready to assimilate with the furry fandom and don't plan on doing so in the near future.
vocalon !0oDERPONYY replied with this 15 years ago, 1 minute later, 6 days after the original post[^] [v] #190,628
@previous (Falco !PZmcClOUDk)
No, I mean you're putting MLP fans in the same category as furries.
Excommunicated.
No, I mean you're putting MLP fans in the same category as furries.
Excommunicated.
Anonymous L replied with this 15 years ago, 44 seconds later, 6 days after the original post[^] [v] #190,630
cat !COOOOOLbus replied with this 15 years ago, 1 day later, 1 week after the original post[^] [v] #191,310
Anonymous S joined in and replied with this 15 years ago, 23 minutes later, 1 week after the original post[^] [v] #191,339
Just one thing to say: LOL at Eurofaggotry.
Anonymous T joined in and replied with this 15 years ago, 2 minutes later, 1 week after the original post[^] [v] #191,340
Anonymous L replied with this 15 years ago, 1 minute later, 1 week after the original post[^] [v] #191,341
Anonymous L double-posted this 15 years ago, 0 seconds later, 1 week after the original post[^] [v] #191,342
Anonymous T replied with this 15 years ago, 24 seconds later, 1 week after the original post[^] [v] #191,343
Anonymous T double-posted this 15 years ago, 15 seconds later, 1 week after the original post[^] [v] #191,344
Anonymous S replied with this 15 years ago, 5 minutes later, 1 week after the original post[^] [v] #191,350
@191,340 (T)
What's that supposed to mean? In Europe they don't allow people with down syndrome to hold flags?
I rest my fucking case. Eurofags suck.
What's that supposed to mean? In Europe they don't allow people with down syndrome to hold flags?
I rest my fucking case. Eurofags suck.
Anonymous T replied with this 15 years ago, 1 minute later, 1 week after the original post[^] [v] #191,351
Anonymous S replied with this 15 years ago, 3 minutes later, 1 week after the original post[^] [v] #191,352
@previous (T)
It'd be funny if it wasn't blatantly false. Obviously, the country taking the shit in this photo would have to be Israel.
The UK had it's time, which long over now.
It'd be funny if it wasn't blatantly false. Obviously, the country taking the shit in this photo would have to be Israel.
The UK had it's time, which long over now.
Anonymous T replied with this 15 years ago, 1 minute later, 1 week after the original post[^] [v] #191,353
@previous (S)
> The UK had it's time, which long over now.
This is what AA+mericans actually believe...
> The UK had it's time, which long over now.
This is what AA+mericans actually believe...
Anonymous U joined in and replied with this 15 years ago, 1 hour later, 1 week after the original post[^] [v] #191,453
All he had to do was claim he was performing self circumcision with the use of the bike chain.
Then claim circumcision interrupts and sue for embarrassment.
Then claim circumcision interrupts and sue for embarrassment.
(Edited 1 minute later.)
jump? replied with this 15 years ago, 3 minutes later, 1 week after the original post[^] [v] #191,456
@190,625 (Falco !PZmcClOUDk)
You're an elitist furry. holy fuck. Ask your mother to slap you. You deserve it.
You're an elitist furry. holy fuck. Ask your mother to slap you. You deserve it.
Anonymous V joined in and replied with this 15 years ago, 1 minute later, 1 week after the original post[^] [v] #191,458
@191,453 (U)
Obviously circumcision is so important, the mechanism for doing so is irrelevant. Even when it amounts to violation and mutilation of a helpless infant, the need to circumcise is so great it negates any and all wrongdoing.
Obviously circumcision is so important, the mechanism for doing so is irrelevant. Even when it amounts to violation and mutilation of a helpless infant, the need to circumcise is so great it negates any and all wrongdoing.
jump? replied with this 15 years ago, 3 minutes later, 1 week after the original post[^] [v] #191,462
@previous (V)
For female circumcision, right? Not the barbaric practice of male circumcision, which is always wrong.
For female circumcision, right? Not the barbaric practice of male circumcision, which is always wrong.
Anonymous U replied with this 15 years ago, 53 seconds later, 1 week after the original post[^] [v] #191,463
@191,458 (V)
Yet women around the world do this to children every day. When the equivalent is performed on girls people end up outraged.
Yet women around the world do this to children every day. When the equivalent is performed on girls people end up outraged.
Anonymous V replied with this 15 years ago, 2 minutes later, 1 week after the original post[^] [v] #191,465
Anonymous G replied with this 15 years ago, 3 minutes later, 1 week after the original post[^] [v] #191,474
This got me thinking even deeper. I thought about all the parents who had lost their children because of war or other disasters. All the children who had lost their parents. All the children whose parents love them just as much but don't have the prosperity to put food on the table like my parents do.
Syntax replied with this 15 years ago, 41 minutes later, 1 week after the original post[^] [v] #191,510
Deeeeeep thinker eh
Anonymous S replied with this 15 years ago, 28 minutes later, 1 week after the original post[^] [v] #191,531
Falco !PZmcClOUDk replied with this 15 years ago, 8 minutes later, 1 week after the original post[^] [v] #191,533
@191,462 (jump?)
> For female circumcision, right? Not the barbaric practice of male circumcision, which is always wrong.
PEE PEE TOUCHING
IT IS ALWAYS WRONG
> For female circumcision, right? Not the barbaric practice of male circumcision, which is always wrong.
PEE PEE TOUCHING
IT IS ALWAYS WRONG
Syntax replied with this 15 years ago, 1 minute later, 1 week after the original post[^] [v] #191,536
@191,531 (S)
One Ex GF told me about the tyme she went shopping with her GF a Lesbian for a fake Penis. Partner required the penetration. I Still fail to understand Y such a Lesbian wood want fake when real is so readily available.
One Ex GF told me about the tyme she went shopping with her GF a Lesbian for a fake Penis. Partner required the penetration. I Still fail to understand Y such a Lesbian wood want fake when real is so readily available.
swamplights !!V3J448+/B replied with this 15 years ago, 11 hours later, 1 week after the original post[^] [v] #191,812
@previous (Syntax)
Because they don't want the person attached to the phallus. How is that hard to understand?
Because they don't want the person attached to the phallus. How is that hard to understand?
TrollBuster3000 replied with this 15 years ago, 1 day later, 1 week after the original post[^] [v] #193,079
swamplights !!V3J448+/B replied with this 15 years ago, 2 minutes later, 1 week after the original post[^] [v] #193,081
Anonymous I replied with this 15 years ago, 18 minutes later, 1 week after the original post[^] [v] #193,105
@191,536 (Syntax)
Well, it's a generational gap thing. You don't understand half of what young-uns do these days, so I'm not surprised you don't understand --Oh, wait, you can't empathize with gay people. That's what it is. You can't empathize.
That and you're kinda disconnected. But it's cute, for an old guy. ;')
Well, it's a generational gap thing. You don't understand half of what young-uns do these days, so I'm not surprised you don't understand --Oh, wait, you can't empathize with gay people. That's what it is. You can't empathize.
That and you're kinda disconnected. But it's cute, for an old guy. ;')
TrollBuster3000 replied with this 15 years ago, 25 minutes later, 1 week after the original post[^] [v] #193,137
@193,081 (swamplights !!V3J448+/B)
Actually, I don't. Most times I am called to defend positions that are not my own.
Actually, I don't. Most times I am called to defend positions that are not my own.
Syntax replied with this 15 years ago, 13 minutes later, 1 week after the original post[^] [v] #193,154
@193,105 (I)
"wait, you can't empathize with gay people"
Most I have met were unhappy people - Of course I have met a few happy gay people.
It is a Generational thing Yes. So shoot if you are male and need a hairy chested dude to get you off that is of course your choice. No one ever saw me posting that Gays should be stopped or arrested or forced to convert 2 b normal. If people are born abnormal such is nature.
Nature makes all sorts 0 Mistrakes. 2Headed Fish to Women with Clitoris in throat as in Linda Lovelace as I saw the movie so it must be true lol
"wait, you can't empathize with gay people"
Most I have met were unhappy people - Of course I have met a few happy gay people.
It is a Generational thing Yes. So shoot if you are male and need a hairy chested dude to get you off that is of course your choice. No one ever saw me posting that Gays should be stopped or arrested or forced to convert 2 b normal. If people are born abnormal such is nature.
Nature makes all sorts 0 Mistrakes. 2Headed Fish to Women with Clitoris in throat as in Linda Lovelace as I saw the movie so it must be true lol
Anonymous I replied with this 15 years ago, 3 minutes later, 1 week after the original post[^] [v] #193,160
@previous (Syntax)
> Most I have met were unhappy people - Of course I have met a few happy gay people.
Yeah, you seem like the type to have a large network of gay friends upon which to draw generalities about most gays. Blow it out your ass, old man. You're about as connected as an S-video cable.
> Most I have met were unhappy people - Of course I have met a few happy gay people.
Yeah, you seem like the type to have a large network of gay friends upon which to draw generalities about most gays. Blow it out your ass, old man. You're about as connected as an S-video cable.
Syntax replied with this 15 years ago, 6 minutes later, 1 week after the original post[^] [v] #193,173
@previous (I)
Of course I do not network with a mass of Gays. How many black friends or Chinese friends do you have?
You may have noticed that the word Fag is a very very very very common term in Chans.
Must pain sim and r04r to continue to c and host such. Chans where they toss out the "N" word as if its normal and ordinary.
What they and I have in common is: Free Speech. So sorry you are not in favor of such.
Of course I do not network with a mass of Gays. How many black friends or Chinese friends do you have?
You may have noticed that the word Fag is a very very very very common term in Chans.
Must pain sim and r04r to continue to c and host such. Chans where they toss out the "N" word as if its normal and ordinary.
What they and I have in common is: Free Speech. So sorry you are not in favor of such.
Anonymous L replied with this 15 years ago, 47 seconds later, 1 week after the original post[^] [v] #193,175
Anonymous I replied with this 15 years ago, 2 minutes later, 1 week after the original post[^] [v] #193,180
@193,173 (Syntax)
I'm all for free speech, but your form of expression is laughable, Matt. And quite insulting.
Quit being a nigger faggot and speak like an adult. I know you're old, but you should still be able to communicate on the computer without looking like a joke. You're not that old. Are you?
I'm all for free speech, but your form of expression is laughable, Matt. And quite insulting.
Quit being a nigger faggot and speak like an adult. I know you're old, but you should still be able to communicate on the computer without looking like a joke. You're not that old. Are you?
Syntax replied with this 15 years ago, 4 minutes later, 1 week after the original post[^] [v] #193,190
Anonymous I replied with this 15 years ago, 3 minutes later, 1 week after the original post[^] [v] #193,194
Syntax replied with this 15 years ago, 3 minutes later, 1 week after the original post[^] [v] #193,198
You do not possess the IQ to even get my handle correct
2:
> Quit being a nigger faggot
One day you may mature and then I may pay attention to your comments. Of course people such as you probably had moms who played with your penis when they were already old enough to hold their own, so please seek some mental help soon.
2:
> Quit being a nigger faggot
One day you may mature and then I may pay attention to your comments. Of course people such as you probably had moms who played with your penis when they were already old enough to hold their own, so please seek some mental help soon.
(Edited 4 minutes later.)
Anonymous I replied with this 15 years ago, 3 minutes later, 1 week after the original post[^] [v] #193,203
@previous (Syntax)
You got me there. My mom had a penis.
Funny how you always attack with gay slurs when you don't have anything else. You do know that insults are totally empty right? This isn't 1995, bud. Try catching up with the rest of us.
You got me there. My mom had a penis.
Funny how you always attack with gay slurs when you don't have anything else. You do know that insults are totally empty right? This isn't 1995, bud. Try catching up with the rest of us.
Syntax replied with this 15 years ago, 2 minutes later, 1 week after the original post[^] [v] #193,204
@previous (I)
I did not say your mom had a penis
I said
"Of course people such as you probably had moms who played with your penis when they were already old enough to hold their own, so please seek some mental help soon."
I did not say your mom had a penis
I said
"Of course people such as you probably had moms who played with your penis when they were already old enough to hold their own, so please seek some mental help soon."
(Edited 11 seconds later.)
Anonymous I replied with this 15 years ago, 4 minutes later, 1 week after the original post[^] [v] #193,206
@previous (Syntax)
Oh, the accusation of pedophilia attack. Good old standards never die. If you wrote even slightly legibly there wouldn't have been any confusion. I'll leave you alone about that though, I heard on GHOUL that you're had a lot of wine tonight and are pretty drunk, so I'll chalk it up to the alcoholism, MAtt.
Oh, the accusation of pedophilia attack. Good old standards never die. If you wrote even slightly legibly there wouldn't have been any confusion. I'll leave you alone about that though, I heard on GHOUL that you're had a lot of wine tonight and are pretty drunk, so I'll chalk it up to the alcoholism, MAtt.
Syntax replied with this 15 years ago, 10 minutes later, 1 week after the original post[^] [v] #193,216
@previous (I)
LOL Considering where and who you admit to hanging out with - Scat and Pedo types and then given you hang there because u follow all that is said over there - LMAO
So eye do know who's puppet you r and y ur a mad lowcow
LOL Considering where and who you admit to hanging out with - Scat and Pedo types and then given you hang there because u follow all that is said over there - LMAO
So eye do know who's puppet you r and y ur a mad lowcow
Anonymous I replied with this 15 years ago, 5 minutes later, 1 week after the original post[^] [v] #193,218
@previous (Syntax)
> Implying.
You're bad at this, bud. Where I troll is not what's in question. I question why Matt's biggest fan doesn't troll him himself? You're just full of excuses and empty baseless conjecture, lol. Just like Matt.
You think you're fooling people, and you can call everyone "stoopid" and "low IQ" all you want, you're the only one that looks like an lolcow, Matt.
> Implying.
You're bad at this, bud. Where I troll is not what's in question. I question why Matt's biggest fan doesn't troll him himself? You're just full of excuses and empty baseless conjecture, lol. Just like Matt.
You think you're fooling people, and you can call everyone "stoopid" and "low IQ" all you want, you're the only one that looks like an lolcow, Matt.
(Edited 21 seconds later.)
Syntax replied with this 15 years ago, 8 minutes later, 1 week after the original post[^] [v] #193,225
@previous (I)
U R fully admitting out in open you use his site.
I may lurk now and then for laffs but never EVER post there. Its truly wonderful to c how many have turned against him NOW lol Yet even I R amazed at how open so many R AT Being so low in IQ they actually loaned him or gave him money.
U cannot deny that now can you.
Yea I let Itamake con me out of some money as well cause he is a weird fan of using the same methods but for me that was chump change. Those teens that hang with him can hardly afford getting out of basement yet loan him money LMAO
U R fully admitting out in open you use his site.
I may lurk now and then for laffs but never EVER post there. Its truly wonderful to c how many have turned against him NOW lol Yet even I R amazed at how open so many R AT Being so low in IQ they actually loaned him or gave him money.
U cannot deny that now can you.
Yea I let Itamake con me out of some money as well cause he is a weird fan of using the same methods but for me that was chump change. Those teens that hang with him can hardly afford getting out of basement yet loan him money LMAO
(Edited 42 seconds later.)
Anonymous I replied with this 15 years ago, 5 minutes later, 1 week after the original post[^] [v] #193,235
@previous (Syntax)
> U R fully admitting out in open you use his site.
Well, I certainly can't troll GIANT HOMOSEXUAL FAGGOT here, now can I? Or can I, syntax? Can I??
> I R amazed at how open so many R AT Being so low in IQ they actually loaned him or gave him money.
Who exactly are you referring to here? Who are you calling stupid R ATs?
> Yea I let Itamake con me out of some money as well cause he is a weird fan of using the same methods but for me that was chump change. Those teens that hang with him can hardly afford getting out of basement yet loan him money LMAO
You sound mad.
> U R fully admitting out in open you use his site.
Well, I certainly can't troll GIANT HOMOSEXUAL FAGGOT here, now can I? Or can I, syntax? Can I??
> I R amazed at how open so many R AT Being so low in IQ they actually loaned him or gave him money.
Who exactly are you referring to here? Who are you calling stupid R ATs?
> Yea I let Itamake con me out of some money as well cause he is a weird fan of using the same methods but for me that was chump change. Those teens that hang with him can hardly afford getting out of basement yet loan him money LMAO
You sound mad.
(Edited 1 minute later.)
Syntax replied with this 15 years ago, 12 minutes later, 1 week after the original post[^] [v] #193,258
@previous (I)
All I have to do is quote your own words
> "I heard on GHOUL that you're had a lot of wine tonight and are pretty drunk, so I'll chalk it up to the alcoholism"
Clearly you are one who reads the site and believes all you read - Case closed and as eye did last night - in this thread I R done with "U"
All I have to do is quote your own words
> "I heard on GHOUL that you're had a lot of wine tonight and are pretty drunk, so I'll chalk it up to the alcoholism"
Clearly you are one who reads the site and believes all you read - Case closed and as eye did last night - in this thread I R done with "U"
Anonymous L replied with this 15 years ago, 3 minutes later, 1 week after the original post[^] [v] #193,265
Anonymous U replied with this 15 years ago, 3 minutes later, 1 week after the original post[^] [v] #193,272
Anonymous V replied with this 15 years ago, 11 hours later, 1 week after the original post[^] [v] #193,610
@193,173 (Syntax)
All channers are fags in one way or another: Christfags, Eurofags, Amerifags, Obamafags. I thought this was common knowledge in the chan community by now. Channers who actually have sex with men are homofags. It's not that complicated really.
All channers are fags in one way or another: Christfags, Eurofags, Amerifags, Obamafags. I thought this was common knowledge in the chan community by now. Channers who actually have sex with men are homofags. It's not that complicated really.
Anonymous C replied with this 15 years ago, 36 minutes later, 1 week after the original post[^] [v] #193,622
@193,258 (Syntax)
Syntax really does argue the same way Matt does.
> ignore relavent points, make blanket insults.
Syntax really does argue the same way Matt does.
> ignore relavent points, make blanket insults.