Minichan

Topic: ANOTHER USAMERICAN school shooting

Anonymous A started this discussion 3 years ago #104,422

Remember, unrelated to guns. Thanks.

Anonymous B joined in and replied with this 3 years ago, 6 minutes later[^] [v] #1,175,823

du arg?

Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 3 years ago, 5 minutes later, 11 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,175,824

@previous (B)
A bit, yes.

Anonymous B replied with this 3 years ago, 2 minutes later, 13 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,175,825

@previous (A)
mad in space lol

Anonymous C joined in and replied with this 3 years ago, 14 minutes later, 28 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,175,830

inb4 liberal hysteria about guns

Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 3 years ago, 41 seconds later, 28 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,175,831

@previous (C)
Why would anyone become upset about a country that has daily mass shootings of children, and is the only country in the world that has that?

Anonymous C replied with this 3 years ago, 2 minutes later, 31 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,175,832

@previous (A)
Governments kill more people than guns do. Why aren't liberals upset about that?

Anonymous B replied with this 3 years ago, 4 minutes later, 35 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,175,835

@1,175,830 (C)
I found a website a few years ago that was like the youtube of police brutality. Scores and scores of videos uploaded everyday.

It's almost like people's outrage towards events isn't at all related to the frequency or likelihood of their occurrence. It's almost like people only get outraged when the news repeatedly slams them with a singular example devoid of any context as to how common it actually is.

Did racism stop being a thing since 2 or so years ago when everyone was rioting over it?
Did police brutality?
Did people stop dying of covid?
Did terrorism stop being a thing since 20 or so years ago when everyone was shepherding in more and more surveillance, lockdowns and wars?

Or, peradventure, all of this outrage does nothing and is for nothing?

Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 3 years ago, 1 minute later, 36 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,175,836

@1,175,832 (C)
They are. Very.

Anonymous B replied with this 3 years ago, 1 minute later, 38 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,175,838

@1,175,831 (A)
What are the odds that a child dies from this or a terrorist attack of any form?

Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 3 years ago, 1 minute later, 39 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,175,839

@previous (B)
Irrelevant. Daily mass shootings.

Anonymous B replied with this 3 years ago, 1 minute later, 41 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,175,841

@previous (A)
Wrong. World's top experts.

Anonymous C replied with this 3 years ago, 2 minutes later, 44 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,175,843

@1,175,836 (A)
Then maybe they should talk about that more. Thanks.

Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 3 years ago, 46 seconds later, 44 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,175,845

@previous (C)
Never heard of anti-war movements? They are all over, all the time. Google "Vietnam War"

Anonymous D joined in and replied with this 3 years ago, 2 minutes later, 47 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,175,846

What I think has to happen, is that the pro-gun crowd just needs to own up to their real poositon on this: that they're willing to accept mass shootings in exchange for gun ownership. No more weak excuses, like "mental health" which republicans don't really care about or do anything about either. Have the courage of your convictions, and admit you're okay with shootings.

Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 3 years ago, 1 minute later, 48 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,175,847

@previous (D)
Yes, exactly. At least they would then be honest and consistent.

Anonymous B replied with this 3 years ago, 20 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #1,175,849

@previous (A)
Irrelevant. Heart disease.

Anonymous E joined in and replied with this 3 years ago, 6 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #1,175,853

How come nobody ever shoots up something that matters? Like a gun show or the Republican National Convention?

Anonymous D replied with this 3 years ago, 3 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #1,175,855

@previous (E)
I think there was a shooter who shot at some Republican politicians. But I forget if he killed any.

Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 3 years ago, 9 seconds later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #1,175,856

@1,175,853 (E)
Because, get this, the RNC *DOES NOT ALLOW GUNS*.

Anonymous E replied with this 3 years ago, 3 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #1,175,857

@previous (A)
That’s trampling upon my second amendment rights!!!

(Edited 53 seconds later.)

Meta !Sober//iZs joined in and replied with this 3 years ago, 1 hour later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,175,894

@OP
Do you own any firearms?
:

Please familiarise yourself with the rules and markup syntax before posting.