Dead !Pool..v42s joined in and replied with this 3 years ago, 4 minutes later[^][v]#1,175,508
Other but I can't explain fully, you'd have to calculate how much electricity is used by the vehicle, find out how much of that was produced by petroleum based energy sources, estimate how much oil was used to produce that electricity, and then also calculate how much gasoline would come from that amount of oil.
Anonymous D joined in and replied with this 3 years ago, 1 hour later, 1 hour after the original post[^][v]#1,175,530
@previous (C)
Penis size should be a volumetric measurement. Let me explain, Western culture has popularised the outdated unit of inches as the common benchmark for comparing penis size. However, it’s 2021 now, we are advancing towards being a multi planetary species; a single axis measurement for a 3D object all of us possess is medieval, and simply not fit for current use.
I suggest a new unit; millimeters - however if this becomes commonly adopted I wish to be credited, please state the unit of penis size as Venus penis points as I am certain I am the first individual to suggest this.
The new methodology of measuring penis should be as followed;
1) The penis is inserted into a measuring cup until it cannot be inserted further.
2) The volume of liquid displaced should equal penis volume.
3) Complete the conversion; 1ml of displaced penis water = 1 Venus penis point.
Please, help me abolish this out dated system - it wrongly paints a world of penis size based on length; perhaps residents of higher than average African nations have gained an unfair advantage over our Asian brothers; we are using a RACIST system based on length not volume to discriminate penises worldwide.
Anonymous F replied with this 3 years ago, 6 minutes later, 4 hours after the original post[^][v]#1,175,551
@previous (Dead !Pool..v42s)
No. An eMPG rating doesn't calculate how much gas was used to generate the electricity you charge a car's battery with. It's okay that your're stoner version of explaining it was inaccurate, gal
Anonymous F double-posted this 3 years ago, 9 minutes later, 4 hours after the original post[^][v]#1,175,552
Anyway. Gasoline has a known energy density of approximately 44 megajoules per kilogram. So it's possible to compare an ICE car's fuel efficiency with an EV car's energy efficiency.
You cannot, however, easily know what mix of fuels were expended to generate the electricity used to charge an EV, so it's pointless to think about in regard to "every electric car". A specific EV owner/driver may, in certain cases, know how much oil was used to charge their car, but most will likely never try to figure that out.
Anonymous D replied with this 3 years ago, 15 minutes later, 4 hours after the original post[^][v]#1,175,555
@1,175,551 (F)
Dead Pool has always been one of our dumbest posters (really says a lot, doesn't it?) don't bother engaging unless you have nothing better to do.
Anonymous C replied with this 3 years ago, 20 minutes later, 21 hours after the original post[^][v]#1,175,634
Battery cost is definitely an issue that EC owners need to know, especially after reading an article about a 2013 Nissan Leaf which needed a new battery after 7: years.
Anonymous F replied with this 3 years ago, 11 minutes later, 22 hours after the original post[^][v]#1,175,635
@1,175,632 (I)
an EV uses the same amount of "battery acid" as an ICE vehicle uses. Check under your're hood if your're curious; you will see a 12V lead-acid battery, similar to one you might see powering the 12V systems in an EV. Now get on your knees and start squealing, boi
Anonymous I replied with this 3 years ago, 1 hour later, 1 day after the original post[^][v]#1,175,688
@1,175,672 (F)
Batteries are discarded in the environment constantly by both industry and consumers. Ignore WEF propaganda in the MSM and look up the facts on Facebook and Youtube if you don't believe me. Thanks.