Topic: I wish I could have been a subway/metro train conductor in the USSR.
Anonymous A started this discussion 3 years ago #104,324 It seems like a good life.
Meta !Sober//iZs joined in and replied with this 3 years ago , 1 hour later[^] [v] #1,175,035 Why don't you just do it here? We have subways here. Or maybe you could be a bus driver.
Meta !Sober//iZs double-posted this 3 years ago , 3 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #1,175,042 We have a light rail in Houston. Maybe you could drive that!
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 3 years ago , 32 seconds later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #1,175,044 @previous (Meta !Sober//iZs)
Nothing "light" about Houston lol
Meta !Sober//iZs replied with this 3 years ago , 2 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #1,175,048 @previous (A)
"Light" rail isn't necessarily light in weight. They are called that because they move lighter loads than freight trains.
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 3 years ago , 17 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #1,175,056 @previous (Meta !Sober//iZs)
They move lighter loads, "lighter" being based on what unit of measurement?
Meta !Sober//iZs replied with this 3 years ago , 4 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #1,175,060 Anonymous C joined in and replied with this 3 years ago , 53 seconds later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #1,175,061 @previous (Meta !Sober//iZs)
So a metro rail car "weighs" less than a pickup truck that delivers freight?
Meta !Sober//iZs replied with this 3 years ago , 1 minute later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #1,175,063 @previous (C)
No the cars weigh much more than a pickup truck.
(Edited 8 seconds later.)
Anonymous C replied with this 3 years ago , 20 seconds later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #1,175,064 @previous (Meta !Sober//iZs)
So it's actually heavy rail.
Meta !Sober//iZs replied with this 3 years ago , 33 seconds later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #1,175,066 @previous (C)
Heavy metal.
Anonymous C replied with this 3 years ago , 1 minute later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #1,175,067 @1,175,063 (Meta !Sober//iZs)
Ways*
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 3 years ago , 36 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,175,075 @1,175,060 (Meta !Sober//iZs)
You just said it is not about weight lol. You have a thing with weight.
Meta !Sober//iZs replied with this 3 years ago , 14 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,175,087 @previous (A)
The rolling stock of light rail is not necessarily light weight. The cargo it carries (people) is light in weight compared to that a freight train would usually carry.
Moto joined in and replied with this 3 years ago , 8 hours later, 10 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,175,207 @1,175,075 (A)
Tho rollong stock of loght rool os not nocossoroly loght wooght. Tho corgo ot corroos (pooplo) os loght on wooght comporod to thot o frooght troon woold osoolly corry.
↕