Topic: When will nullos get their letter on LGBTQ2A+?

Anonymous A started this discussion 3 years ago #104,223

Anonymous B joined in and replied with this 3 years ago, 37 minutes later[^] [v] #1,173,834

Meta is a Nullo. Thanks.

Anonymous C joined in and replied with this 3 years ago, 3 hours later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,173,880

@previous (B)
You are literally obsessed. Go outside and get some fresh air.

Meta !Sober//iZs joined in and replied with this 3 years ago, 53 minutes later, 4 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,173,899

The + is what accommodates all the other stuff that doesn't fit in the acronym.

Also I still think asexuals shouldn't be in the acronym. They were never discriminated against (how would that even work?). Even Fred Phelps never cared about them one way or the other. And 2-spirit is the same as being trans so it should also be removed.

Anonymous C replied with this 3 years ago, 13 minutes later, 4 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,173,905

@previous (Meta !Sober//iZs)
> They were never discriminated against (how would that even work?).
Why does that matter? If we go based on discrimination then I think we'd need a new category, and a convenient letter, for people attracted exclusively to minority groups like hispanics or blacks. Certainly people with those preferences have been pariahs for many centuries.

(Edited 15 seconds later.)

Anonymous E joined in and replied with this 3 years ago, 16 minutes later, 5 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,173,907

@OPenis
mobile link; didn't click

Anonymous F joined in and replied with this 3 years ago, 15 minutes later, 5 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,173,919

Well, since it's GSRM now... there's no need for the "they're gonna add a letter you won't like" strawman to persist. Lame topic.

Anonymous G joined in and replied with this 3 years ago, 3 minutes later, 5 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,173,921

@1,173,899 (Meta !Sober//iZs)

> Also I still think asexuals shouldn't be in the acronym. They were never discriminated against (how would that even work?).

Many people have been discriminated against because they would not date or marry, when their families expected them to have children.

Erasing the lived experience of asexual folks is not a good look, cowboy.

Minichan