Topic: Christopher Ferguson Rufo invented critical race theory and has a Thai wife
boof started this discussion 3 years ago #104,111
hot stuff
Anonymous B joined in and replied with this 3 years ago, 1 week later[^] [v] #1,175,468
Hapahazard.Anonymous C joined in and replied with this 3 years ago, 1 hour later, 1 week after the original post[^] [v] #1,175,477
This person's feet were black, like a black person's feet! Not that there's anything wrong with black people, plus black people's feet are pink on the bottom and this was frostbite!
!MLHqI35Srs joined in and replied with this 3 years ago, 49 minutes later, 1 week after the original post[^] [v] #1,175,485
He courtiered for it; what were you smoking?
The Content Rater joined in and replied with this 3 years ago, 11 hours later, 1 week after the original post[^] [v] #1,175,571
Tho Contont Rotor joined in and replied with this 3 years ago, 6 minutes later, 1 week after the original post[^] [v] #1,175,574
!MLHqI35Srs joined in and replied with this 3 years ago, 1 day later, 1 week after the original post[^] [v] #1,175,784
@1,175,571 (The Content Rater)
You were about to luck out on a browser-system crash for any of the "advanced-simple" tribes obsessed about that; mine is a simple-advanced tribe about thereasadvanced.
My highest history credential can either be misinterpreted not even an attempt to apply (not unwise because it was less than boring; indoctrination was a pre-guarantee self-warning if I'm truthful), or part of a new dual-parallelization's legally-movemented attempt in standards to officiate the few strong non pre-degs. I know my stuff here; it is illegible for some micro-grammar intendedly however so you may benefit part-credentiarially...
I can't even exist without being trolled in sound-terrorism or with someone else's academic and possible virtue-signal trolling (the mail wasn't for me; the mail was euthymic prop. for someone's "'legit'" law-deg, as a non-BSVer and someone protesting semi-legal "revenge IQ"-ascription plots to secure "well deserved punit tra'w'ps" (feel, don't just hear, the Scot's accented underclass tone, even in latent genics))... Matt-standarding is correct as a eugenics method, we in Choson are mixed but semi-solidly agree with it1.
I signed the closest thing I felt to a strong "let's cast papier Chris-chans". I'm already aheave-thereasthat. It'll allow me to save him conspiratorially-investigatorially as I know this to be one of the few strengths I can offer in my plight despite being America's gummed-boot *chosonically painted negroid mail-man laughter-balls or something*.
Macau law, primarily. Almost solely. Rason law on this scurried for Bologna in '09, and then '19-'21 even allowed multi-segmentalizatory rule upon it under the manaical delusion of confidence supreme law in the "'whatever Autphag doesn't unaxiomatically disagree, or invertedly agree, with'"-movement.
You were about to luck out on a browser-system crash for any of the "advanced-simple" tribes obsessed about that; mine is a simple-advanced tribe about thereasadvanced.
My highest history credential can either be misinterpreted not even an attempt to apply (not unwise because it was less than boring; indoctrination was a pre-guarantee self-warning if I'm truthful), or part of a new dual-parallelization's legally-movemented attempt in standards to officiate the few strong non pre-degs. I know my stuff here; it is illegible for some micro-grammar intendedly however so you may benefit part-credentiarially...
I can't even exist without being trolled in sound-terrorism or with someone else's academic and possible virtue-signal trolling (the mail wasn't for me; the mail was euthymic prop. for someone's "'legit'" law-deg, as a non-BSVer and someone protesting semi-legal "revenge IQ"-ascription plots to secure "well deserved punit tra'w'ps" (feel, don't just hear, the Scot's accented underclass tone, even in latent genics))... Matt-standarding is correct as a eugenics method, we in Choson are mixed but semi-solidly agree with it1.
I signed the closest thing I felt to a strong "let's cast papier Chris-chans". I'm already aheave-thereasthat. It'll allow me to save him conspiratorially-investigatorially as I know this to be one of the few strengths I can offer in my plight despite being America's gummed-boot *chosonically painted negroid mail-man laughter-balls or something*.
Macau law, primarily. Almost solely. Rason law on this scurried for Bologna in '09, and then '19-'21 even allowed multi-segmentalizatory rule upon it under the manaical delusion of confidence supreme law in the "'whatever Autphag doesn't unaxiomatically disagree, or invertedly agree, with'"-movement.
(Edited 14 minutes later.)
Anonymous F replied with this 3 years ago, 14 hours later, 1 week after the original post[^] [v] #1,175,923
@previous (!MLHqI35Srs)
My highest history credential can either be misinterpreted not even an attempt to apply (not unwisely) to my tribe's history or not (as I would like to remember, I would like to explain the simple-advanced mathematical sciences).
I do not believe that serving a common math discussion (which I do not like) is correct, for "subjects" are more advanced.
Expectations/Expressions
I've encountered an argument with a man who works for me and is very similar to this one. He is a very good man and one day I meet him with my armoured supervisor and afterwards I introduced myself and seated myself across from him. He was not particularly friendly and did not bother to play games with me. This is no excuse for his political intrigue and he showed no signs of my assertion of having worked there (thankfully).
See you later.
See you later.
I will catch up with him at the San Diego club.
[May 17, 2002, I had a discussion with Mr. Beckley, "India's Safety Limitations" by his cousin. As a sexual predator, I committed to staying for "sexual predators today" with my neighbour, Mr. Beckley, at a local convention for his well-being. He was a lawyer and he had the broad serious attitudes of many staff at NASA and a "8-hour-month-later" approach to life _._
My highest history credential can either be misinterpreted not even an attempt to apply (not unwisely) to my tribe's history or not (as I would like to remember, I would like to explain the simple-advanced mathematical sciences).
I do not believe that serving a common math discussion (which I do not like) is correct, for "subjects" are more advanced.
Expectations/Expressions
I've encountered an argument with a man who works for me and is very similar to this one. He is a very good man and one day I meet him with my armoured supervisor and afterwards I introduced myself and seated myself across from him. He was not particularly friendly and did not bother to play games with me. This is no excuse for his political intrigue and he showed no signs of my assertion of having worked there (thankfully).
See you later.
See you later.
I will catch up with him at the San Diego club.
[May 17, 2002, I had a discussion with Mr. Beckley, "India's Safety Limitations" by his cousin. As a sexual predator, I committed to staying for "sexual predators today" with my neighbour, Mr. Beckley, at a local convention for his well-being. He was a lawyer and he had the broad serious attitudes of many staff at NASA and a "8-hour-month-later" approach to life _._