Anonymous B replied with this 4 years ago, 2 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^][v]#1,171,721
@previous (D)
Not the definition of a logical fallacy. > In philosophy, a formal fallacy, deductive fallacy, logical fallacy or non sequitur[1] (/ˌnɒn ˈsɛkwɪtər/; Latin for "it does not follow") is a pattern of reasoning rendered invalid by a flaw in its logical structure that can neatly be expressed in a standard logic system, for example propositional logic.[2] It is defined as a deductive argument that is invalid.
Anonymous D replied with this 4 years ago, 5 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^][v]#1,171,722
@previous (B)
It absolutely is a fallacy. I took several formal logic courses at the university level. You do not not even have a GED. Get that degree, and then we'll talk. Thanks.
boof joined in and replied with this 4 years ago, 1 hour later, 2 hours after the original post[^][v]#1,171,729
shootings livestreamed on Twitch because Twitter hates freedom
Anonymous B replied with this 4 years ago, 1 minute later, 2 hours after the original post[^][v]#1,171,730
@1,171,722 (D)
It is not. Also, I don't care how many classes you took through DeVry. 😂😂😂
Meta !Sober//iZs joined in and replied with this 4 years ago, 13 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[^][v]#1,171,735
@1,171,720 (D)
Some idiot's blog is not a reliable source, regardless of what they taught you at DeVry.
boof replied with this 4 years ago, 2 hours later, 4 hours after the original post[^][v]#1,171,752
murderes shoulds be able to Tweet from prison
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 4 years ago, 3 hours later, 7 hours after the original post[^][v]#1,171,758
ok found it thanks
Anonymous A (OP) double-posted this 4 years ago, 8 hours later, 16 hours after the original post[^][v]#1,171,791