Topic: Does anyone have the Buffalo NY mass shooting / Payton Gendron manifesto?
Anonymous A started this discussion 3 years ago #104,006 Thanks in advance (Edited 18 seconds later.)
Anonymous B joined in and replied with this 3 years ago , 4 minutes later[^] [v] #1,171,696 Anonymous B double-posted this 3 years ago , 4 minutes later, 8 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,171,697 Fun fact: he was 5 years old when minichan was created.
> tfw when you realize 2011 was 25 years ago
Anonymous C joined in and replied with this 3 years ago , 45 seconds later, 9 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,171,698 If it's dumb and obvious...
Anonymous D joined in and replied with this 3 years ago , 5 minutes later, 14 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,171,700 Anonymous D double-posted this 3 years ago , 17 seconds later, 15 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,171,701 Which group was he targeting? They said it is a hate crime.
Anonymous B replied with this 3 years ago , 7 minutes later, 22 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,171,705 Anonymous E joined in and replied with this 3 years ago , 17 minutes later, 39 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,171,714 @1,171,698 (C)
Then it is dumb and obvious, obviously.
Anonymous D replied with this 3 years ago , 5 minutes later, 45 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,171,716 @previous (E)
That is a tautology, which is a logical fallacy.
Anonymous F joined in and replied with this 3 years ago , 1 minute later, 46 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,171,717 @previous (D)
You seem smart. How would you complete the sentence "If it's dumb and obvious..."?
Anonymous D replied with this 3 years ago , 1 minute later, 47 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,171,718 @previous (F)
"...then the person who posted that is stupid and repetitive."
Anonymous B replied with this 3 years ago , 4 minutes later, 52 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,171,719 @1,171,716 (D)
It couldn't be further from a logical fallacy.
> tautology: a statement that is true in every possible interpretationAnonymous D replied with this 3 years ago , 7 minutes later, 59 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,171,720 Anonymous B replied with this 3 years ago , 2 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #1,171,721 @previous (D)
Not the definition of a logical fallacy.
> In philosophy, a formal fallacy, deductive fallacy, logical fallacy or non sequitur[1] (/ˌnɒn ˈsɛkwɪtər/; Latin for "it does not follow") is a pattern of reasoning rendered invalid by a flaw in its logical structure that can neatly be expressed in a standard logic system, for example propositional logic.[2] It is defined as a deductive argument that is invalid.Anonymous D replied with this 3 years ago , 5 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #1,171,722 @previous (B)
It absolutely is a fallacy. I took several formal logic courses at the university level. You do not not even have a GED. Get that degree, and then we'll talk. Thanks.
boof joined in and replied with this 3 years ago , 1 hour later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,171,729 shootings livestreamed on Twitch because Twitter hates freedom
Anonymous B replied with this 3 years ago , 1 minute later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,171,730 @1,171,722 (D)
It is not. Also, I don't care how many classes you took through DeVry. 😂😂😂
Meta !Sober//iZs joined in and replied with this 3 years ago , 13 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,171,735 @1,171,720 (D)
Some idiot's blog is not a reliable source, regardless of what they taught you at DeVry.
boof replied with this 3 years ago , 2 hours later, 4 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,171,752 murderes shoulds be able to Tweet from prison
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 3 years ago , 3 hours later, 7 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,171,758 ok found it thanks
Anonymous A (OP) double-posted this 3 years ago , 8 hours later, 16 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,171,791 and by "thanks" i mean thanks for nothing, idiots
↕