Minichan

Topic: Does anyone have the Buffalo NY mass shooting / Payton Gendron manifesto?

Anonymous A started this discussion 3 years ago #104,006

Thanks in advance

(Edited 18 seconds later.)

Anonymous B joined in and replied with this 3 years ago, 4 minutes later[^] [v] #1,171,696

https://duckduckgo.com/?q=Payton+Gendron+manifesto

Anonymous B double-posted this 3 years ago, 4 minutes later, 8 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,171,697

Fun fact: he was 5 years old when minichan was created.

> tfw when you realize 2011 was 25 years ago

Anonymous C joined in and replied with this 3 years ago, 45 seconds later, 9 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,171,698

If it's dumb and obvious...

Anonymous D joined in and replied with this 3 years ago, 5 minutes later, 14 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,171,700

@previous (C)
Then what?

Anonymous D double-posted this 3 years ago, 17 seconds later, 15 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,171,701

Which group was he targeting? They said it is a hate crime.

Anonymous B replied with this 3 years ago, 7 minutes later, 22 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,171,705

@previous (D)
https://duckduckgo.com/?q=who+was+Payton+Gendron+targeting

Anonymous E joined in and replied with this 3 years ago, 17 minutes later, 39 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,171,714

@1,171,698 (C)

Then it is dumb and obvious, obviously.

Anonymous D replied with this 3 years ago, 5 minutes later, 45 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,171,716

@previous (E)
That is a tautology, which is a logical fallacy.

Anonymous F joined in and replied with this 3 years ago, 1 minute later, 46 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,171,717

@previous (D)
You seem smart. How would you complete the sentence "If it's dumb and obvious..."?

Anonymous D replied with this 3 years ago, 1 minute later, 47 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,171,718

@previous (F)
"...then the person who posted that is stupid and repetitive."

Anonymous B replied with this 3 years ago, 4 minutes later, 52 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,171,719

@1,171,716 (D)
It couldn't be further from a logical fallacy.
> tautology: a statement that is true in every possible interpretation

Anonymous D replied with this 3 years ago, 7 minutes later, 59 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,171,720

@previous (B)
It IS a logical fallacy, because it cannot be falsified by nature.

http://believingscience.blogspot.com/2016/08/todays-logical-fallacy-istautology.html

Anonymous B replied with this 3 years ago, 2 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #1,171,721

@previous (D)
Not the definition of a logical fallacy.
> In philosophy, a formal fallacy, deductive fallacy, logical fallacy or non sequitur[1] (/ˌnɒn ˈsɛkwɪtər/; Latin for "it does not follow") is a pattern of reasoning rendered invalid by a flaw in its logical structure that can neatly be expressed in a standard logic system, for example propositional logic.[2] It is defined as a deductive argument that is invalid.

Anonymous D replied with this 3 years ago, 5 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #1,171,722

@previous (B)
It absolutely is a fallacy. I took several formal logic courses at the university level. You do not not even have a GED. Get that degree, and then we'll talk. Thanks.

boof joined in and replied with this 3 years ago, 1 hour later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,171,729

shootings livestreamed on Twitch because Twitter hates freedom

Anonymous B replied with this 3 years ago, 1 minute later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,171,730

@1,171,722 (D)
It is not. Also, I don't care how many classes you took through DeVry. 😂😂😂

Meta !Sober//iZs joined in and replied with this 3 years ago, 13 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,171,735

@1,171,720 (D)
Some idiot's blog is not a reliable source, regardless of what they taught you at DeVry.

boof replied with this 3 years ago, 2 hours later, 4 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,171,752

murderes shoulds be able to Tweet from prison

Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 3 years ago, 3 hours later, 7 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,171,758

ok found it thanks

Anonymous A (OP) double-posted this 3 years ago, 8 hours later, 16 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,171,791

and by "thanks" i mean thanks for nothing, idiots
:

Please familiarise yourself with the rules and markup syntax before posting.