Topic: Forced vaccinations are coming.
Anonymous A started this discussion 3 years ago #103,906
The day that the Supreme Court strikes down abortion will be a direct attack upon bodily autonomy which means that the federal government will have full rights to force us to take vaccinations and implant microchips into our systems. I don't know why my fellow right wingers don't see what's happening here. By attacking a woman's right to their own bodily autonomy will be the gateway to the government to control what substances and what technology gets put into us. I hope you all love your freedom, because pretty soon, that's going to be gone.
Anonymous B joined in and replied with this 3 years ago, 7 minutes later[^] [v] #1,170,786
The problem with the left is, they think they can threaten politicians and the public into submitting to them with their violent protests. No, it will only turn the public against them in the end. Some people might have voted for Biden because they thought that would bring stability to the country. Since that is being proven wrong and violence is now erupting all over the world, come 2024 the next President will most likely be a Republican. If China wants to invade Taiwan, then it better happen before January 2025 while they still have a friend in the WH, because it won't be happening after a Republican takes office.
Protesting outside the homes of judges is a felony, but the Biden admin won't do anything about it. Democrats can call them peaceful protests all they want, but it is still a federal crime to try and intimidate judges into changing their verdicts. Republicans will prosecute people like that, and you can count on it once they gain power again. Republicans firmly believe in enforcing the law.
Lastly, the Republicans have got to finish draining the swamp. Remove all radical left officers from the military (force them into early retirement). Remove all senior officers from the federal law enforcement agencies. Replace them with people that will do their jobs by protecting this country by enforcing the law and not violating the rights of We the People.
Protesting outside the homes of judges is a felony, but the Biden admin won't do anything about it. Democrats can call them peaceful protests all they want, but it is still a federal crime to try and intimidate judges into changing their verdicts. Republicans will prosecute people like that, and you can count on it once they gain power again. Republicans firmly believe in enforcing the law.
Lastly, the Republicans have got to finish draining the swamp. Remove all radical left officers from the military (force them into early retirement). Remove all senior officers from the federal law enforcement agencies. Replace them with people that will do their jobs by protecting this country by enforcing the law and not violating the rights of We the People.
Anonymous C joined in and replied with this 3 years ago, 17 seconds later, 8 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,170,787
Don't worry. I think that the guys who want to ban abortion don't want to force vaccines into people.
Anonymous D joined in and replied with this 3 years ago, 13 minutes later, 21 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,170,790
lol 9/11 bud
Anonymous E joined in and replied with this 3 years ago, 18 minutes later, 40 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,170,792
Anonymous F joined in and replied with this 3 years ago, 40 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #1,170,793
I'm not American thankfully. Nothing but crap and the transistor has come from that eternally dammed country. Letting states choose whether abortion is available seems a good fit. Conservative states can choose to ban it. Liberal states can allow it. Don't like your current state choice? Go elsewhere. It kinda seems ideal. Plus just get abortion medicine posted to you if you are in the wrong location.
This is just like prostitution, gambling and firearm use. Don't like your state's choice? Move.
This is just like prostitution, gambling and firearm use. Don't like your state's choice? Move.
dw !p9hU6ckyqw joined in and replied with this 3 years ago, 35 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #1,170,795
why is this being decided in a court
Anonymous H joined in and replied with this 3 years ago, 2 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #1,170,796
Anonymous E replied with this 3 years ago, 8 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,170,797
@1,170,793 (F)
How long is the drive from your house to the nearest country that isn't the one you're in now?
How long is the drive from your house to the nearest country that isn't the one you're in now?
Anonymous F replied with this 3 years ago, 7 hours later, 9 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,170,820
dw !p9hU6ckyqw replied with this 3 years ago, 1 hour later, 10 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,170,821
@1,170,796 (H)
why does that mean parliament can't make a law legalising/banning abortion
why does that mean parliament can't make a law legalising/banning abortion
(Edited 2 minutes later.)
Meta !Sober//iZs joined in and replied with this 3 years ago, 13 minutes later, 11 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,170,824
@previous (dw !p9hU6ckyqw)
The court is saying Congress (our version of parliament) can make a law legalizing or banning it.
Until the Federal government does this, it will be decided by the states. So Texas will ban abortion but California will allow it.
The court is saying Congress (our version of parliament) can make a law legalizing or banning it.
Until the Federal government does this, it will be decided by the states. So Texas will ban abortion but California will allow it.
Anonymous H replied with this 3 years ago, 1 hour later, 12 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,170,836
Anonymous E replied with this 3 years ago, 4 hours later, 17 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,170,870
@1,170,820 (F)
Lmao, that explains it.
The thing people from outside the US just don't get is that the US is neither small enough that "move to another state" is a trivial deal geographically (Texas alone is 2.8 times the size of the UK.) nor homogenous enough that "move to another state" is a trivial deal culturally (whether a state is red or blue is redecided every year, basically) nor wealthy enough that "move to another state" is a trivial deal financially. (The poverty rate in the US is 11.8%.)
And all of these are especially true if you're in a position where you're in real, life-threatening trouble if your state outlaws abortion.
Lmao, that explains it.
The thing people from outside the US just don't get is that the US is neither small enough that "move to another state" is a trivial deal geographically (Texas alone is 2.8 times the size of the UK.) nor homogenous enough that "move to another state" is a trivial deal culturally (whether a state is red or blue is redecided every year, basically) nor wealthy enough that "move to another state" is a trivial deal financially. (The poverty rate in the US is 11.8%.)
And all of these are especially true if you're in a position where you're in real, life-threatening trouble if your state outlaws abortion.
Anonymous F replied with this 3 years ago, 15 minutes later, 17 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,170,871
I have moved cities 4 times in my life. It's not particularly easy but I wouldn't say it was particularly difficult either.
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 3 years ago, 2 hours later, 20 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,170,913
@1,170,786 (B)
Like the Republicans who now have top companies like Disney saying it's not profitable to be conservative?
Like the Republicans who now have top companies like Disney saying it's not profitable to be conservative?
Anonymous A (OP) double-posted this 3 years ago, 53 seconds later, 20 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,170,914
Anonymous J joined in and replied with this 3 years ago, 39 minutes later, 20 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,170,915
dw !p9hU6ckyqw replied with this 3 years ago, 1 hour later, 22 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,170,917
Anonymous H replied with this 3 years ago, 7 minutes later, 22 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,170,918
𝔹𝕝𝕠𝕞 joined in and replied with this 3 years ago, 1 hour later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,170,923
Lol why would they need to implant microchips when everyone already carrys a tracker with them anyway
Anonymous L joined in and replied with this 3 years ago, 1 hour later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,170,925
@1,170,871 (F)
> I have moved cities 4 times in my life. It's not particularly easy but I wouldn't say it was particularly difficult either.
Oh, did you do it with crippling medical bills and a pregnancy hanging over your head? Did you do it while six months pregnant? Did you have pets? A family? Some single guy can easily pack up his shit and move and then talk about how easy moving is on the internet. It's not the same for everyone, genius.
Not everyone has the freedom to just get up and leave. Not everyone has the money. Not everyone even has the mobility required to pack up and go without help.
> I have moved cities 4 times in my life. It's not particularly easy but I wouldn't say it was particularly difficult either.
Oh, did you do it with crippling medical bills and a pregnancy hanging over your head? Did you do it while six months pregnant? Did you have pets? A family? Some single guy can easily pack up his shit and move and then talk about how easy moving is on the internet. It's not the same for everyone, genius.
Not everyone has the freedom to just get up and leave. Not everyone has the money. Not everyone even has the mobility required to pack up and go without help.
dw !p9hU6ckyqw replied with this 3 years ago, 20 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,170,928
Anonymous L replied with this 3 years ago, 5 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,170,929
Anyway, on the "forced vaccinations are coming" front. Asshats have been saying this since 2020. It's not happened. It's a fucking conspiracy shitstain pipe dream. It's something paranoid preppers yell to justify their beliefs that the government is suddenly going to come take their shit.
Anonymous H replied with this 3 years ago, 9 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,170,931
@1,170,925 (L)
they're just not poor enough! a few years ago they were busing homeless people out of new york city. now they're getting free bus tickets out of san fransisco and portland straight to the boondocks.
https://www.nytimes.com/2019/09/14/us/homeless-busing-seattle-san-francisco.html
but the US isn't the only place where you can travel for free thousands of miles. the UK's now planning to send aslyum seekers straight to rwanda. i guess their program of deporting uk nationals that had been in the country 50+ years (windrush generation) was so successful that they just had to follow it up with this.
https://www.bbc.com/news/uk-43782241
they're just not poor enough! a few years ago they were busing homeless people out of new york city. now they're getting free bus tickets out of san fransisco and portland straight to the boondocks.
https://www.nytimes.com/2019/09/14/us/homeless-busing-seattle-san-francisco.html
but the US isn't the only place where you can travel for free thousands of miles. the UK's now planning to send aslyum seekers straight to rwanda. i guess their program of deporting uk nationals that had been in the country 50+ years (windrush generation) was so successful that they just had to follow it up with this.
https://www.bbc.com/news/uk-43782241
(Edited 34 seconds later.)
Anonymous H double-posted this 3 years ago, 43 seconds later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,170,932
Anonymous C replied with this 3 years ago, 1 minute later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,170,933
@1,170,925 (L)
lol this. Anonymous F's posts did make me laugh, they are hopelessly naive. He thinks that moving to another state is a simple matter and affordable for anyone who doesn't like their state's policy
lol this. Anonymous F's posts did make me laugh, they are hopelessly naive. He thinks that moving to another state is a simple matter and affordable for anyone who doesn't like their state's policy
Anonymous H replied with this 3 years ago, 1 minute later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,170,934
@1,170,929 (L)
2020 wasn't that long ago. and while they are not "forced" on anyone, regardless of one's views on the matter, it's hard to argue that they aren't becoming de-facto required for more and more things.
2020 wasn't that long ago. and while they are not "forced" on anyone, regardless of one's views on the matter, it's hard to argue that they aren't becoming de-facto required for more and more things.
Anonymous H double-posted this 3 years ago, 2 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,170,935
@1,170,933 (C)
and more severely there aren't even any good states, or countries for that matter, to move to. trade these meme rights for those meme rights. there isn't any where on earth where it seems laws are written or enforced with any serious principles in mind.
and more severely there aren't even any good states, or countries for that matter, to move to. trade these meme rights for those meme rights. there isn't any where on earth where it seems laws are written or enforced with any serious principles in mind.
Anonymous L replied with this 3 years ago, 32 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,170,938
@1,170,931 (H)
Wow have been reading outdated racist pamphlets?
The follow-up on the Windrush stuff is basically that it's some people named after a ship that carried 492 passengers, many of them children. People arriving in the UK between 1948 and 1971 from Caribbean countries have been labeled the Windrush generation. That incident mostly ended with the Home Secretary apologizing for the treatment of the Windrush generation, saying it was "wrong" and "appalling" that some face deportation... in 2018. That's a really fucked up incident (not that the British Empire is exactly clean of fucked up incidents) we can all have a conversation about.
> a few years ago they were busing homeless people out of new york city. now they're getting free bus tickets out of san fransisco and portland straight to the boondocks.
> https://www.nytimes.com/2019/09/14/us/homeless-busing-seattle-san-francisco.html
It's not surprising you didn't actually read the article:
"As cities see their homeless populations grow, many are buying one-way bus tickets to send people to a more promising destination, where family or friends can help get them back on their feet. San Francisco’s “Homeward Bound” program, started more than a decade ago when Gov. Gavin Newsom of California was the city’s mayor, transports hundreds of people a year."
Also you failed to mention the barrier to entry for such a program, such as needing to have family, friends, or a job lined up where you're going. I know it's fun just to read a headline and pretend your homeless enemies get a free ticket anywhere, but that's not the case.
Also, forced vaccinations aren't coming. It's weird you try to stoke fears of immigrants in response to criticism of your forced vaccination claims...
Wow have been reading outdated racist pamphlets?
The follow-up on the Windrush stuff is basically that it's some people named after a ship that carried 492 passengers, many of them children. People arriving in the UK between 1948 and 1971 from Caribbean countries have been labeled the Windrush generation. That incident mostly ended with the Home Secretary apologizing for the treatment of the Windrush generation, saying it was "wrong" and "appalling" that some face deportation... in 2018. That's a really fucked up incident (not that the British Empire is exactly clean of fucked up incidents) we can all have a conversation about.
> a few years ago they were busing homeless people out of new york city. now they're getting free bus tickets out of san fransisco and portland straight to the boondocks.
> https://www.nytimes.com/2019/09/14/us/homeless-busing-seattle-san-francisco.html
It's not surprising you didn't actually read the article:
"As cities see their homeless populations grow, many are buying one-way bus tickets to send people to a more promising destination, where family or friends can help get them back on their feet. San Francisco’s “Homeward Bound” program, started more than a decade ago when Gov. Gavin Newsom of California was the city’s mayor, transports hundreds of people a year."
Also you failed to mention the barrier to entry for such a program, such as needing to have family, friends, or a job lined up where you're going. I know it's fun just to read a headline and pretend your homeless enemies get a free ticket anywhere, but that's not the case.
Also, forced vaccinations aren't coming. It's weird you try to stoke fears of immigrants in response to criticism of your forced vaccination claims...
Anonymous H replied with this 3 years ago, 6 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,170,940
Anonymous H double-posted this 3 years ago, 3 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,170,941
> make post
> immediately have someone read the exact opposite of what you're saying
lol never change minichan
> immediately have someone read the exact opposite of what you're saying
lol never change minichan
Anonymous L replied with this 3 years ago, 6 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,170,942
@1,170,940 (H)
Feel free to actually make a valid point instead of just posting 'wrong' over and over. I look forward to your "concise" (which, knowing you, will probably be just calling me names) rebuttal.
Feel free to actually make a valid point instead of just posting 'wrong' over and over. I look forward to your "concise" (which, knowing you, will probably be just calling me names) rebuttal.
Anonymous H replied with this 3 years ago, 8 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,170,944
Anonymous L replied with this 3 years ago, 1 minute later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,170,945
Anonymous H replied with this 3 years ago, 1 minute later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,170,946
Anonymous L replied with this 3 years ago, 1 minute later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,170,947
Anonymous H replied with this 3 years ago, 5 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,170,948
@previous (L)
your reply was so off base from what i was saying that i don't know where to even begin. help me out a little. what in gods name made you think there was any fear of immigrants in my post
your reply was so off base from what i was saying that i don't know where to even begin. help me out a little. what in gods name made you think there was any fear of immigrants in my post
