Anonymous B joined in and replied with this 3 years ago, 5 minutes later[^][v]#1,168,107
Yes, the same way that not having Ebola should be a condition of employment. Also, being against medical science shows stupidity, and employers should not want stupid employees.
Meta !Sober//iZs replied with this 3 years ago, 33 minutes later, 3 hours after the original post[^][v]#1,168,136
@previous (B)
True but ignoring medical science indicates an employee is stupid. Even if drinking itself isn't contagious, a stupid employee can still cause plenty of other fuckups (not to mention those arising from coming into work drunk and/or hungover).
Anonymous B replied with this 3 years ago, 10 minutes later, 3 hours after the original post[^][v]#1,168,137
@previous (Meta !Sober//iZs)
Is there a difference between someone who willingly ignores medical science, and someone who has an addiction that he or she is actively working on?
Killer Lettuce🌹 !HonkUK.BIE joined in and replied with this 3 years ago, 4 hours later, 8 hours after the original post[^][v]#1,168,151
@1,168,120 (Kook !!rcSrAtaAC)
I more or less agree with this. If someone is in a medical setting where they're in direct contact with patients, that's definitely a situation where mandatory vaccines would be justified, I would say.
There could be other jobs where there's a strong argument for them, but at any rate, this is definitely a justified one IMO.