Topic: New Minichan macro photography thread
Anonymous A started this discussion 4 years ago #102,900
Anonymous A (OP) double-posted this 4 years ago, 46 seconds later[^] [v] #1,162,160
Anonymous A (OP) triple-posted this 4 years ago, 1 minute later, 2 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,162,161
Anonymous A (OP) quadruple-posted this 4 years ago, 31 seconds later, 3 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,162,162
Anonymous A (OP) quintuple-posted this 4 years ago, 59 seconds later, 3 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,162,163
Anonymous A (OP) sextuple-posted this 4 years ago, 54 seconds later, 4 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,162,164
cccuuunnttt !.cATkimmOo joined in and replied with this 4 years ago, 14 minutes later, 19 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,162,165
What is the point of this
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 4 years ago, 11 minutes later, 30 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,162,166
cccuuunnttt !.cATkimmOo replied with this 4 years ago, 18 minutes later, 49 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,162,167
Anonymous C joined in and replied with this 4 years ago, 32 seconds later, 50 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #1,162,168
@previous (cccuuunnttt !.cATkimmOo)
So, all other photo threads are fine, but mine is not. Could you please explain?
So, all other photo threads are fine, but mine is not. Could you please explain?
boof joined in and replied with this 4 years ago, 12 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #1,162,170
Anonymous E joined in and replied with this 4 years ago, 1 minute later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #1,162,171
All of your pictures are out of focus. Please focus your camera or use a more appropriate focal length.
Dead !Pool..v42s joined in and replied with this 4 years ago, 42 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #1,162,175
boof replied with this 4 years ago, 4 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #1,162,176
ohh haha
Anonymous C replied with this 4 years ago, 6 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #1,162,177
Anonymous E replied with this 4 years ago, 3 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,162,178
Anonymous G joined in and replied with this 4 years ago, 30 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,162,179
@1,162,168 (C)
Matt, there is a life lesson that you clearly haven't learned. It's not that most people in your life are jerks who bully you for no reason, it's that you are annoying and your behavior makes people dislike you.
Matt, there is a life lesson that you clearly haven't learned. It's not that most people in your life are jerks who bully you for no reason, it's that you are annoying and your behavior makes people dislike you.
Anonymous C replied with this 4 years ago, 5 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,162,180
Anonymous H joined in and replied with this 4 years ago, 8 hours later, 10 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,162,209
@previous (C)
> Posting photos? Yeah, so annoying.
Your pictures are ugly and they suck. You are ugly and you suck.
> Posting photos? Yeah, so annoying.
Your pictures are ugly and they suck. You are ugly and you suck.
Anonymous I joined in and replied with this 4 years ago, 1 minute later, 10 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,162,210
cccuuunnttt !.cATkimmOo replied with this 4 years ago, 1 hour later, 12 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,162,214
Erik !AltRitexT6 joined in and replied with this 4 years ago, 2 hours later, 14 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,162,232
I bet one can store a lot of porn on that bad boy
Anonymous K joined in and replied with this 4 years ago, 1 hour later, 15 hours after the original post[^] [v] #1,162,258
illegal shtick
Meta !Sober//iZs joined in and replied with this 4 years ago, 21 hours later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,162,381
@1,162,168 (C)
> So, all other photo threads are fine, but mine is not. Could you please explain?
Svet occasionally posts pictures of things which are not the consumer electronics on his desk. He will post street scenes, people, cool graffiti he found, interesting architecture. You do not do this.
If every one of Svet's photography threads was a badly lit, out of focus, "macro" photo of some piece of consumer electronics he bought (and had already posted previous threads with photos of it), his photography threads would get the same reaction.
> So, all other photo threads are fine, but mine is not. Could you please explain?
Svet occasionally posts pictures of things which are not the consumer electronics on his desk. He will post street scenes, people, cool graffiti he found, interesting architecture. You do not do this.
If every one of Svet's photography threads was a badly lit, out of focus, "macro" photo of some piece of consumer electronics he bought (and had already posted previous threads with photos of it), his photography threads would get the same reaction.
Killer Lettuce🌹 !HonkUK.BIE replied with this 4 years ago, 34 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,162,392
Out of curiosity, I tried some of this "Marco photography" on some of my coins using my phone camera. I don't think they came out very well. You probably need a high-end camera to do it well.
@OP
OP, perhaps what you need is a better camera (or at least better focus) and more interesting subjects. It seems that nature is often a subject for this kind of photography. Maybe you could show us some local plants? Or at least some objects around your home that are more interesting than your fingers and a hard drive.
@OP
OP, perhaps what you need is a better camera (or at least better focus) and more interesting subjects. It seems that nature is often a subject for this kind of photography. Maybe you could show us some local plants? Or at least some objects around your home that are more interesting than your fingers and a hard drive.
Anonymous M joined in and replied with this 4 years ago, 4 hours later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,162,426
@previous (Killer Lettuce🌹 !HonkUK.BIE)
How many years does it take for someone to lose the benefit of the doubt with you? 20? 30?
How many years does it take for someone to lose the benefit of the doubt with you? 20? 30?
Anonymous N joined in and replied with this 4 years ago, 8 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,162,428
Anonymous M replied with this 4 years ago, 51 seconds later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,162,429
Meta !Sober//iZs replied with this 4 years ago, 44 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,162,438
@1,162,392 (Killer Lettuce🌹 !HonkUK.BIE)
> Out of curiosity, I tried some of this "Marco photography" on some of my coins using my phone camera. I don't think they came out very well. You probably need a high-end camera to do it well.
An old trick is to put a small drop of water on the camera lens. This will allow you to get clear close ups (albeit with a bit of a fisheye lens effect). I don't know if this works on the modern phone cameras with multiple lenses but you could try!
> Out of curiosity, I tried some of this "Marco photography" on some of my coins using my phone camera. I don't think they came out very well. You probably need a high-end camera to do it well.
An old trick is to put a small drop of water on the camera lens. This will allow you to get clear close ups (albeit with a bit of a fisheye lens effect). I don't know if this works on the modern phone cameras with multiple lenses but you could try!
jodie !foster2PAQ joined in and replied with this 4 years ago, 13 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,162,441
jodie !foster2PAQ double-posted this 4 years ago, 17 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,162,446
here's a pic of my cat grass kl's post got me playing with my phone camerajodie !foster2PAQ triple-posted this 4 years ago, 30 seconds later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,162,447
look it's. macro photographyjodie !foster2PAQ quadruple-posted this 4 years ago, 22 seconds later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,162,448
macrotography(Edited 12 seconds later.)
Anonymous M replied with this 4 years ago, 1 minute later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,162,449
jodie !foster2PAQ replied with this 4 years ago, 53 seconds later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,162,450
m'graphyjodie !foster2PAQ double-posted this 4 years ago, 1 minute later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,162,451
@1,162,449 (M)
im not adjusting the manual focus it's just set all the way down because that's what macrotography is all about
im not adjusting the manual focus it's just set all the way down because that's what macrotography is all about
jodie !foster2PAQ triple-posted this 4 years ago, 1 minute later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,162,452
@1,162,449 (M)
"the focus is whatever is closest" that's what my teacher Mateo Milera taught me. he was a great macrotopographer
"the focus is whatever is closest" that's what my teacher Mateo Milera taught me. he was a great macrotopographer
Anonymous M replied with this 4 years ago, 24 seconds later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,162,453
@1,162,451 (jodie !foster2PAQ)
It's all about setting the f-stop all the way down. You still have to focus the camera.
It's all about setting the f-stop all the way down. You still have to focus the camera.
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 4 years ago, 1 hour later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,162,485
Anonymous A (OP) double-posted this 4 years ago, 45 seconds later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,162,486
Anonymous M replied with this 4 years ago, 17 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,162,491
@1,162,485 (A)
@previous (A)
Out of focus and too high of an ISO. Please take a photography 101 class.
@previous (A)
Out of focus and too high of an ISO. Please take a photography 101 class.
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 4 years ago, 9 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #1,162,493
